Engineering a Sustainable World: What Does It Take to Come Out on Top? The modern lifestyle, full of one time use items and pollution generating machines, is harming our environment, and, without a plan, the death of our planet is certain. Environmentalist and author, Derrick Jensen uses a comparison of possible outcomes to persuade his readers to take action that would help stop climate change; political resistance is his preferred and recommended course of action for his audience. Throughout his essay, “Forget Shorter Showers”, Jensen makes clear his desire to reduce or even reverse the effects industrialization (476-478). He advocates an approach where society makes changes to industry and to government over the current methods of voluntary …show more content…
personal change (Jensen 477). Consumers account for only a fraction of wasted items, such as water, energy and refuge (Jensen 487). Jensen’s idea for large scale change over a personal approach must be utilized. Governments, corporations, militaries and agribusiness are responsible for the vast majority of resource consumption and environmental destruction (477). Only through advances, in science, engineering, agriculture, and other technology driven industries, are we able to mitigate the negative effects of being an industrialized society without sacrificing our modern amenities. Changes in individual lifestyles are woefully inadequate and will yield miniscule amounts of positive effects result. “Simple living” even at its most extreme would not be enough to save the planet, according to Jensen; “Simple living” is an active choice made by individuals to reduce their carbon footprint through voluntary reduce, reuse, and recycle methods. The author expands on these ideas when he cites Kirkpatrick Sale; “The whole individualist what-you-can-do-to-save-the-Earth guilt trip is a myth. We, as individuals, are not creating the crises, and we can’t solve them” (Jensen 478). This means that individual effort can only go so far toward rebuilding the global ecosystem. Instead, there needs to be a greater response from the groups that cause the bulk of the issues. Changes in Governmental, corporate and agricultural organizations are imperative. Most importantly, we need to have major technological breakthroughs in these sectors to stop the damage being done to the planet. Current sources of renewable energy are great ideas, but are cost prohibitive and inefficient, making widespread use impossible for most developing countries. Developing countries need major advances in lower cost energy to break their dependencies, of environmentally costly fossil fuels. Additionally, developed countries need to do more to deploy the existing technology and cut back on the wasteful energy expenditures that go along with our creature comforts. One way to reduce energy usage on things like heating and air conditioning is to build LEED certified buildings.
LEED, or Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design, is a certification program for green buildings with stringent requirements for building energy efficient and environmentally responsible structures. Some requirements of this program include specific building materials, smart grid capable, gray water reclamation systems, green space minimums, high levels of insulation and low thermal transfer glass (US Green Building Council). Green buildings are a must if we are to sustain our current level of growth. Despite the higher initial cost of these buildings, the long term energy savings make these buildings a smarter choice for …show more content…
businesses. Advances in agribusiness are real tributes to what modern science and technology are capable of achieving when it comes to reducing our impact on the environment.
As Jensen points out, farming and industry accounts for the vast majority of total water usage in the world (477). The increasingly scarce resource is a necessary ingredient when growing food. Technology continuously improves to make it easier for farmers to grow crops while using less water. Scientists at the University of Georgia utilize what they term “variable rate irrigation” to let farmers automate the current systems of irrigation to water only the crops that need it (Gies). This is an example of retrofitting current farms, but there is a new way of farming coming to cities that reuses practically all of its water and stakes claim much less acreage in the process. The future of agriculture belongs to vertical and urban farming. These types of farms reduce the use of water, chemicals (such as pesticides, herbicides and fungicides), soil and space (The Economist). These farms are so cutting edge that they are mostly in the experimental stages. Firms like Famgro farms are testing “stackable” farming systems that can scale with demand, even further reducing waste. Famgro’s stackable farms are ideal for cityscapes where land is at a premium; furthermore, reaping the added benefit of being in close proximity to the customers that they serve. Customers will enjoy high quality, fresh produce at only a slightly
higher cost. With the cost of electricity being expensive relative to the cost of the free energy of the sun, one can expect prices of the produce grown on these farms to be closer to that of an upscale organic market (Fehrenbacher). Unavoidably, energy will always be a major factor in the pursuit of a sustainable environment. In fact, one can measure the progress of a society by how well it uses the energy around it. The Kardashev scale measures a civilization by its ability to harness the energy available in its current environment; a Type 1 civilization being one that can utilize all of the available energy sources on its home planet (Wikipedia). According to the Wikipedia entry, in 2012 we were at .724 on Kardashev’s scale and it is expected that we will reach Type 1 in the next 100 to 200 years (Wikipedia). To become Type 1, scientists need to discover ways of reclaiming the waste made during manufacturing and usage of goods. Waste heat, for example, is one of the most abundant wasted byproducts generated during these processes. Waste heat is generated by a number of sources: byproduct of burning fossil fuels, friction from moving parts in machinery, or even a high concentration of living organisms in a confined space; for instance, a building that houses college students. A research team from the University of Arizona has developed a way to capture waste heat using thermodynamics (Ramon). The process includes no moving parts and can be applied to almost any heat generating device. Heat passing through the device gets converted to electrical energy that can then be used as supplemental power for other devices (Ramon). These units will help increase the efficiency of current technology and forge a path to developing nearly waste free technology in the future. Google is developing its own source of free energy (LaMonica). The technology giant is looking to harness the power of waves to generate energy for its data centers (LaMonica). The waves cause movement that drives motors and actuators. These, in turn, produce electricity that can be stored and reused when needed. Above all, this energy is generated cleanly, without polluting the water or air around it. Wave motion energy is another example of how society is minimizing its impact on the environment. There are many examples of how technology pushes us towards a sustainable future, much more numerous than the few that were presented above. Money and time donated by philanthropists and visionaries, such as, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, and Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, towards global resource sustainability projects, forge a new vision for a green future. We still have much to do in implementing changes with regard to individuals, corporations and governments. Changes require a social consciousness that can come through personal enlightenment, but ultimately, changes have to be made on a larger scale. We should push forth with industrialization while maintaining a level of responsibility to the environment. This responsibility will help redefine what it is to be human by encouraging humanity to solve the world’s problems with science, technology and engineering.
Tim had no desire to fight in the war he believed it was unethical and against his beliefs.
As cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; Indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.” In an excerpt from an essay published in the New York Times Magazine, American public intellectual Michael Pollan reveals his goal to convince the ordinary of citizens America that they are capable of saving the world from climate change and to answer the unappeasable question of “Why bother?”. This inquiry stems from the belief that one person is not capable of making a difference in relation to the larger spectrum of Americans who continue to emit a large amount of C02, increasing the effects of climate change, and destroying the environment. Through the exploration of behavior change, and other personal alternatives aimed to reduce America 's carbon footprint, Pollan aspires to have
Climate change, never has such an impending natural disaster been so heavily ignored. While this problem of Greenhouse Gasses holds more long-term implications than any other problem found today, little to nothing has been done to address this problem. Through the last century, industrialization has revolutionized the world, in all aspects of life from comfort to industry. While this has obviously had its benefits, it has also created a world that is almost entirely dependent on carbon dioxide producing technology. This has caused the single biggest problem when it comes to curbing this issue known as climate change. That problem is the simple fact that in order for the people to make a positive unified change in the C02 levels they produce, they’re going to have to make sacrifices. These sacrifices range from giving up or reducing their use of various CO2 producing technologies, to paying new taxes such as carbon taxes. The causes for Climate Change and the lack of action to curb it are, of course, complex, but there are at least three significant factors: High prices required to produce and implement low-carbon technology; lack of political and corporate support; and an extensive public reliance on technology (Weeks). More than this, the public, along with the government, have been unwilling to sacrifice either money or effort, which has only served to exponentially increase the problem at hand.
Fossil fuel emissions are the major cause in climate change and human beings are the ones using theses as their energy sources. The carbon dioxide that is emitted into the atmosphere cause changes in nature and the, “Violations of the natural conditions of life turn into global social, economic, and medical threats to people-with completely new sorts of challenges to the social and political institutions of highly industrialized global society” (Beck, 80). People need to throw away their anthropocentric views and realize that the issue is not only the environment being affected by global warming, but that their lives are being disturbed by this phenomenon also. Many people tend to try and not harm themselves, instead they aim to stay healthy so they can live long prosperous lives. German sociologist Urlich Beck’s idea that “nature is society and society is also ‘nature’” (Beck, 81) suggests that the argument on climate change is more personal than anything. It is something that should be discussed in the private sphere by individuals reflecting on their own lives and choices. Humans should not look at recycling, as an example, a way to reuse the resources the earth gives them to help it sustain, but instead as a way to ensure that there will always be resources for themselves and their descendants to survive. The carbon emissions
A green building (also referred to as sustainable building or green construction) is a structure that employs an approach that is responsible for the environment besides being efficient in regard to resources all through its life cycle: This is from selecting the site to designing it, constructing, operating, maintaining, renovating and demolishing it. To achieve this, the client, the engineers, the architects and the entire design team closely cooperate at all stages of a project (Yan and Paliniotis, 2006). Practicing Green Building complements and expands the conventional building design areas of comfort, durability, utility and economy.
Mougeot, Luc. Growing Better Cities: Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Development. International Development Research Centre, 2006.
Another alternative that emerged by the increasing practice of eco-friendly spaces is the LEED certification by the US Green Building Council. This certification is a demanding and rigorous program, which is constantly evaluated and incorporates new concepts periodically, mainly based on the new technologies that have arisen and the studies that have been carried out on green buildings that have been operating for several years.
The beginnings of today's green revolution can be traced back to the environmental awareness of the 1960s and European design. New construction techniques have lead to the development of innovative materials and design concepts. Green buildings are designed, constructed and commissioned to ensure they are healthy for their occupants. Successfully designed green projects can involve an extensive array of factors, ranging from the resourceful use of materials, to careful consideration of function, climate, and location.
Globally, green buildings are being recognised and accredited, leading to the introduction of various tools and indices with one common objective that is to evaluate, measure, distinguish and sets apart this uniquely designed buildings from the rest. The Diamond Building carries a Green Building Index (GBI) accreditation, a first in Malaysia. Among the achievement of the ST Diamond Building are:
LEED is depending on opinion of The USGBC define it " an acceptable nationally benchmark for designing, building and operation for high-performance green buildings " and " Building owners and operators with tools they need to provides a direct effect and measurable influence on the performance of their buildings ".
"A Renewed Commitment to Buildings and Their Social Benefits." U.S. Green Building Council. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013. .
Since there are so many types LEED does not certify certain buildings because they would not fall under certain criteria. This is where different LEED partners come in, they are part of the Green Building Council. LEED use to certify parking garages but in 2009 parking garages could no longer get a certification from LEED because 75% or more the floor space is used to allow vehicles to rotate through (USGBC). Parksmart is a certification process that allows parking structures to be qualified to be green. Like LEED, Parksmart has different levels of certification: Bronze, Silver, and Gold which are all based on a point system also pioneer level is available for existing structures (USGBC). Another partner is PEER which is Performance Excellence in Electricity Renewal. PEER is a certification process that monitor’s how electricity is generated and being transferred making sure energy is not lost through this process (Certification). A certification can be achieved in three different area: campus project, city project, and supply project. Each of these areas has different assessment to determine whether or not they qualify for the PEER certification
Sustainable design seeks to reduce negative impacts on the environment, the health and comfort of building occupants, thereby improving building performance. The basic objects of sustainability are to reduce consumption of non-renewable resources, minimal waste, and create healthy, productive environments (“Sustainable Design”). Focusing primarily on the sustainable design principles, there are five, including: low-impact materials, energy efficiency, quality and durability, design for reuse and recycling, and renewability. As sustainability appears to become the necessary trend in architecture, the question concerning the cost versus outcome of “going green” really an investment or a waste of time and money comes to mind. With our research provided below, we believe the expenses may truly be with the investment in the end.
Urban farming is the practice of growing and harvesting crops in urbanised areas such as, cities or towns. Urban farms are extremely beneficial, as they utilise unused space in efficient ways. For instance, vertical and rooftop gardens use minimal space and make use of areas that would otherwise be unused, providing a range of fresh, healthy produce. Many people around the world rely on food sourced from urban farms and local gardens. Farmers markets are a rapidly growing trend and provide fresh, quality produce to food insecure households, they are most common in rural and urban areas, as these communities may not have easy access to large food stores or supermarkets. The produce sourced from local farmers markets are fresh, and often picked either the night before or that morning, compared to supermarkets where the fruit and vegetables lose valuable nutrients and antioxidants after being pickled and sitting for days. With the produce being locally sourced, much of the money is transferred back into the local economy. Farmers markets create job opportunities and the ability to make profit and create food security. Urban Farms and farmers markets both positively contribute to the idea of food security by supplying quality, fresh produce
Unites States Green Building Council. (2014). Leadership in energy and environmental design. Retrieved from http://www.usgbc.org/leed#why