Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
David foster wallace commencement speech counterarguments and rebuttals
Walter white character analysis
David foster wallace speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Worship Begins and Ends with Meth
The world today is filled with a variety of challenges. Inevitably we confront conflicts and contrariety and approach them with little to none awareness. In David Foster Wallace’s speech “Real Freedom,” he explains that a majority of today’s society are not “properly educated” to think. Wallace’s primary point of his speech is to question what people worship, whether it be an object, a characteristic or someone and what ones “default setting” might be. He does not want his audience to state what religion they worship but rather something or someone that helps define that individual person and their life. A perfect example to Wallace’s ‘worship’ theme and “default setting” theory is the protagonist, Walter
…show more content…
White, from the show Breaking Bad. Walter White is a chemistry teacher turned crystal-methamphetamine cook, who has been diagnosed with lung cancer.
Being a high school chemistry teacher, he has no feasible way to afford the cancer treatments offered to him. So what does he do? The logical thing of course: cooking methamphetamine. What starts out as just a side hobby, ends up becoming a lifestyle for Walter White; shaping his entire personality. The business White creates starts off shaky due to the hardships of acquiring the equipment and ingredients needed, however, as time passes by, Walter White learns the “do’s and don’ts” of the business operation and before you know it, he has a multi-million dollar drug scheme. By examining Walter White’s persona through the lens of Wallace’s “worship” and “default setting” theory, we are able to see why it strengthens Wallace’s rhetorical argument of why it …show more content…
is essential to have simple, everyday awareness. Being a writer and an English professor, David Foster Wallace is able to form a strong connection with each and every reader of his speech. However, that is not the only reason why the audience is captivated in this excellent speech. The speech is written to empower the readers and to show them obvious issues that are overlooked and passed by everyday. The issues that Wallace addresses in his speech are self-centeredness and egotism. Throughout his commencement speech, Wallace incorporates short anecdotes and two theories to describe the issue of egotism and unawareness: the “worship” and “default setting.” These theories help to explain that everyone in this world worships something. Some people have compelling interests in choosing to worship “some sort of god or spiritual-type thing” because “pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive” (Wallace). What Wallace is stating is that anything one worships, which is not in the spiritual/religious sense, will become one of their main unconscious focuses in life. Supporting Wallace’s argument that “there is no such thing as not worshipping,” (Wallace), is Breaking Bad’s protagonist, Walter White.
Picture a middle-aged man who has a loving family, are extremely happy, and financially stable. Now picture a middle-aged man who has lung cancer, has been disowned by his family, fired from his job, has several murders under his belt, and facilitates a multi-million dollar illegal drug operation. This man is Walter White. And all the good changed for the worst with the news of him getting lung cancer. Soon after this news, his “cancer became not only the impetus for [his] transformation, but perhaps a metaphor for what Walt himself becomes as he greedily consumes and destroys anything that stands in the way of his growth, influence, and power” (Kitson). Walter White began operating a business with a step-by-step procedure that slowly slipped into his unconsciousness. And once that had happened, his family and social life slipped away from him. Walter White worshiped his meth industry he built up, the money, and the power and control he had. For example in Walter White strengthens Wallace’s claim that “if you worship money and things, if they are where you tap real meaning in life, then you will never have enough, never feel you have enough” (Wallace). White accurately supports Wallace’s claim because throughout the last two season of the show, White had an unending hunger for a steady cash flow and superiority over other drug
lords. For example, in season 4, he assassinated the head drug lord in his area to gain control of all the drug trafficking and distribution in that area. “No matter how much Walt made, he wanted more -- until the bitter end, when ego was all that mattered” (Shane). Walter had become so engulfed in his worship of power and money, that he was unaware of the deleterious effects of his behavior. Although repeatedly explaining to his family that he was doing it to benefit them, they had no support in it. Instead of the abundance of money, White’s family wanted love and that was something Walter failed to keep “the truth up front in daily consciousness” (Wallace). Walter White was not aware of the consequences till midway through season five of the show when it was already to late to seek forgiveness and reconciliation. Walter attempted to buy his family’s and friend’s compassion back, however those closest to him [could] no longer stomach his insincere claims to love them so much [that he kept] putting them in danger and implicating them in his crimes by plying them with drug money” (Shane). As Walter White soon discovered after losing his family to money, “the real world [did] not discourage [him from worshipping], because the so-called real world of men and money and power hums merrily along in a pool of fear and anger and frustration and craving and worship of self” (Wallace). The second theory Walter White hits the nail on is default setting. With many jobs today, such as fast food and car production, they appear to involve a repetitive process of going about things. Walter White’s meth-making process is no different. His process begins with setting up the laboratory, laying out all the ingredients, ‘cooking’ the meth and lastly, distributing the final product. On a daily basis, he repeats this process over and over again until he runs out of ingredients to create methamphetamine. Wallace says that “default setting” is “the kind of worship [where] you gradually slip into day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that’s what you’re doing” (Wallace). Walter White’s character definitely strengthens Wallace’s explanation on “default setting,” because White was consumed in cooking meth and has always had a keen eye for perfection. We live in a world today where many of us think we are the center of attention. Most often we are applauded for our achievements, appreciated if we excel and told that the world is abundant with limitless opportunities. However, too much praise can cause us to become “obsessed” with this feeling of satisfaction and lose sight on life’s overall big picture. Unfortunately, Walter White fell victim to Wallace’s theory of worship and “default setting.” Putting his meth industry as his main and only priority, White was unable to appreciate the big picture in life: his loving family, friends and school staff. It was all about him; enclosed in a soundproofed bubble and oblivious to the impact his self-centeredness had on the people he loved and admired. In the end, Walter White lost everything he loved, even his illegal business scheme. Walter White strengthens David Foster Wallace’s rhetorical argument about his theory of worship and “default setting” because White kept his ego inflated; he put his priorities first and gained the mentality that the world revolved around him. In strengthening Wallace’s point, it is safe to discern that Wallace wants people to free themselves from their self-centered ego and their desire to continually pride themselves into thinking how special they are. “The really important kind of freedom involves attention and awareness and discipline, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them over and over in myriad petty, unsexy ways every day” (Wallace 32).
Journalist Charles Lane learned about the Colfax Massacre case while he was on The Washington Post case. In his book “The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, The Supreme Court, and The Betrayal of Reconstruction”, Lane spotlights the Colfax Massacre of 1873 and the result of that event. Lane gives an insightful and detailed analysis of the conditions in Louisiana during this time of reconstruction, both politically and socially. He describes the death of over 60 blacks as a result of the horrific attack that took place at the Colfax court house. Lane recounts the Federal and the Supreme Court trials and the aftermath of the criminals’ not guilty verdict.
Patterson, Foner, and King all describe their typological analysis of Freedom in three uniquely different ways.
Moore investigates the attitudes, behavior, and perception of Americans regarding their respective individual sacred and secular lives. He is interested in the roles of popular culture and religion and in addition, how popular culture affected the shift in boundaries between sacredness and secularism, particularly how these practices shape American religion. We live in a complex society and social structure that is structured with norms and values that they themselves structure the way we interpret and interact with others.
Walter wants financial freedom, he doesn't want just enough money to provide for his family, but rather he tells his mother "I want so many things. " Walter is materialistic and greedy, corrupted by a superficial “American dream”. Walter has no desire to find out about himself through his African American heritage. He believes he can define himself through money, money is everything to this man.
History is taught and perceived in different ways throughout the country, however historians and teachers play a major role in how history is understood. My history teacher made me understand that the African-American slaves suffered adversity in different manners but never explained how their efforts led to a revolution in America. This gap has been filled by David Roediger in his book Seizing freedom where he reminds us of what we have missed in our prominent and scholarly accounts of emancipation and what we might gain by revisiting an era when “profound and unimaginable changes exploded” across the country(p.9). In reference to WEB Du Bois analysis of Civil war as workers strike, David Roediger accounts for the upsurge and
In the minds of the general population many would argue that the most significant part of any piece of literary, artistic, or vocal work is the title. The title often times resonates through the heart of an audience, while simultaneously imprinting specific emotions and thoughts in their psyche. In Lawrence Levine’s “The Quest for Certainty”, the title is used to address the motivation enslaved African-Americans possessed in which they ultimately utilized to create sacred music. An understanding of the title “The Quest for Certainty” needs to first be analyzed in a contextual manner, to understand its power. Quest is defined as “a long or arduous search for something” . This “something” that quest is referring to in context of African-American slavery is freedom.
It is common for human beings, as a race, to fall into the comforts of routine – living each day similar to days before and days to come. Unfortunately, it is often too late before one even realizes that they have fallen into this mundane way of living in which each day is completed rather than lived, as explained by David Foster Wallace in “This Is Water”. This commencement speech warned graduating students of the dangers of submitting to our “default settings” of unconscious decisions and beliefs (Wallace 234). However, this dangerous way of living is no new disability of today’s human race. Socrates warned the people of his time: “A life unaware is a life not worth living” and who is to say he wasn’t completely right? A topic of long debate also includes the kind of influence that consciously-controlled thoughts can have on the physical body. A year after Wallace’s speech, neurobiologist Helen Pilcher, published “The New Witch Doctor: How Belief Can Kill”, which explains the influence of the mind and individual beliefs on the quality of one’s life. Together, both authors illustrate how detrimental a life lived unaware of one’s own thoughts and beliefs can be on the body and spirit. And though it is easy to live by
David Foster Wallace, author of the essay “Authority and American Usage*,” praises and advocates for “good” writers who have a strong rhetorical ability, which he defines as “the persuasive use of language to influence the thoughts and actions of an audience” (Wallace 628). To have a strong rhetorical ability, an author needs to be aware of whom their audience is, in order to present their information in a way that will be influential on their audience. Wallace recognizes that an author who applies a strong rhetorical ability will be able to connect with the audience so that they respond “not just to [their] utterance but also to [them]” (Wallace 641). An author needs to take into consideration not just content, syntax and grammatical structure (their “utterance”) but also how their character will be perceived by their audience. A positive tone will make the author seem more pleasant and relatable, whereas a negative tone connotes arrogance and pretentiousness. That is why it is crucial for an author to recognize that an audience will respond to “them” and not just their “utterance,” as an author’s appearance to their readers can also shape how impactful their writing is.
Throughout time, readers have learned many different lessons from their favourite books. In The Chrysalids, John Wyndam used his story to teach his readers valuable, lifelong lessons. He makes it evident to his readers that prejudging certain people is not right. Also, he relates how change is possible, but hard to achieve. More specifically, religion often influences one’s point of view. John Wyndam’s, The Chrysalids was written with a purpose that teaches his readers about discrimination, about how change is possible, and how religion often influences one’s point of view.
I believe David Foster Wallace’s aim for writing this piece was to explain his reasoning for killing and eating animals and to understand other people’s views on the issue as well. This is apparent throughout the writing. Wallace starts out by giving his personal description of the Maine Lobster Festival. He describes how it takes place July 30th through August 3rd, thousands of people come to the festival every year, its broadcasted on live television by CNN, and about 25,000 fresh lobsters are eaten over the course of the festival. Additionally, he goes into the biology of the lobster such as the scientific name and evolution. Leading up to this, he states the question for writing this piece, “Is it alright to boil a sentient creature alive for our gustatory pleasure” (p.9 Wallace)?
In Rochester, New York on July 5, 1852 Frederick Douglass, a former slave, spoke at the Ladies’ Anti-Slavery Society on the irony of rejoicing and celebrating the freedom and independence of America, a country in which so much of the population was not free, but rather enslaved (Faigley 351). His speech was a fiery call to arms for the abolitionists at the meeting to not only concern themselves with the issue, but also to take action; not only to listen but to become engaged. His work was a powerful example of the anger, frustration, and raw emotion felt by the millions of slaves in the Americas, and how it could be put to work, exposing the hypocrisy of many white
Walter attempts to reinvent himself through his work and relationships to try and provide for his wife and family. Walter is fighting a battle within his household because he believes that Ruth, his wife, “couldn’t be on [his] side that long for nothing,” even though she is just trying to do what is best for everyone involved (Hansberry 32). Walter cannot see past his dream to realize the impact it would have on everyone else if it failed, so he drowns his sorrows in alcohol. Although “he knows the possibility of failure is also a vital part of the American success story” Walter is not just risking his own future, he is risking his child’s, mother’s and sister’s and without a second thought to his personal relationships, he blindly makes an investment on the chance of having the wealth and house he desires for everyone (Washington 98). Walter is so focused on reinventing his work life and having money that he loses sight of his family’s values and ideas. He does not care about Ruth being pregnant and the possibility of aborting their child as long as he can achieve his goals. Walter is living in a dream where he believes that “anyone can become anything he wants to be,” and that is not true in his case with the social and racial standards that are set against him (Washington 95). Walter sees wealth as ensuring happiness and having everything he desires, which is why he is pushing his family so hard for the money, causing issues. Even though all the odds are set against him in this time period, Walter cannot see past being able to provide for his family and having the American Dream that he most
The 2007 movie Freedom Writers gives a voice of hope and peace in a fragile environment where hate and sorrow battle in the life of urban teenagers. This drama film narrates the true story of a new English teacher, Erin Growell, who is designated to work in an inner-city school full of students surround by poverty, violence and youth crime bands. During the beginning of the movie, the teacher struggles to survive her first days at this racially segregated school in which students prejudice her for being white and ignore her authority in the classroom. The teacher encounters the life of students who are hopeless for a better future and attached to a delinquency lifestyle of survival. In addition, she confronts a reality of lack of educational
The film Freedom Writers directed by Richard La Gravenese is an American film based on the story of a dedicated and idealistic teacher named Erin Gruwell, who inspires and teaches her class of belligerent students that there is hope for a life outside gang violence and death. Through unconventional teaching methods and devotion, Erin eventually teaches her pupils to appreciate and desire a proper education. The film itself inquiries into several concepts regarding significant and polemical matters, such as: acceptance, racial conflict, bravery, trust and respect. Perhaps one of the more concentrated concepts of the film, which is not listed above, is the importance and worth of education. This notion is distinctly displayed through the characters of Erin, Erin’s pupils, opposing teachers, Scott and numerous other characters in the film. It is also shown and developed through the usage of specific dialogue, environment, symbolism, and other film techniques.
“We fight each other for territory; we kill each other over race, pride, and respect. We fight for what is ours. They think they’re winning by jumping me now, but soon they’re all going down, war has been declared.” Abuse, Pain, Violence, Racism and Hate fill the streets of Long Beach, California. Asians, Blacks, Whites and Hispanics filled Wilson High School; these students from different ethnic backgrounds faced gang problems from day to night. This movie contains five messages: people shouldn’t be judgmental because being open-minded allows people to know others, having compassion for a person can help people change their views in life, being a racist can only create hate, having the power of the human will/goodness to benefit humanity will cause a person to succeed at any cost and becoming educated helps bring out the intelligence of people.