Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on personal development
Batool, B.F. (2013). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 85-94
Batool, B.F. (2013). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 85-94
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction on personal development
David Foster Wallace was an Amherst College graduate, who delivered a unique and inspirational commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005. In his speech, Wallace talks about his perspective on the value of a liberal arts education. In his speech, Wallace warns his audience that life is filled with daily routines, dead-eyed clerks, empty phrases and annoyance, which he then explains, can either drive a person insane or simply make them become selfish. Wallace stresses how virtually important it is to pay attention to other people’s needs. He also explains how the daily choices we me will constantly impact our lives, whether that be negative or positive.
Through a unique approach, Wallace sends an extremely informative message to his audience. He explains that what we worship is at the heart of “This is Water”. When stating this, Wallace is not referring to religion but goes on and says that the religion we choose to worship is a conscious devotion. What we care about is what essentially governs how we live our lives, as Wallace says, is also unconscious. In other words, he is implying that people often don’t acknowledge the needs of others because they are too focused on themselves.
Wallace then explains how a person cannot only change themselves, but also the community that surrounds them by simply choosing how and what to think when put in certain situation. He also gives a description of an adult’s average daily routine. Wallace elaborates on the repetition and same stale setbacks that life throws at you. Being stressed with things such as work or relationships, often lead people into thinking they are the center of the universe and that the world revolves around them. When we only focus on ourselves, we forg...
... middle of paper ...
... demonstrated how people would feel if someone else took their anger out on them. People should not only think of themselves but others as well. Everyone around us is just as important as we are.
In conclusion, when people choose to start paying more attention, they will be able to make choices that will improve the quality their lives and the life’s of others around them. Having awareness and not just becoming frustrated with people can help a person think about the lives of others. I found Wallace’s speech to be relatable to not only me, but also to others because it is a lesson that society can benefit from. Paying attention to the obvious can help a person realize all of the amazing opportunities that are being portrayed right in front of them. We all just “have to just keep reminding ourselves over and over: ‘This is water, this is water’” (Wallace 209).
The importance of attending an institute of higher learning continues to grow as the job market becomes more competitive, and a diploma is essentially required to compete in it. However, with the growing demand for college and university successful students the concept of education has become clouded. In two commencement speeches, one by David Sedaris and the other by David Wallace, this concept of what education means and how it is viewed by the individual student is discussed as well as the process of thinking. David Seders, in his speech What I Learned, writes in a satirical format based on how education is being viewed. David Wallace in his commencement speech addresses the process of thinking and being self-aware with a college education.
In today’s society, one of the most natural human traits is selfishness. David Foster Wallace incorporated this idea in his commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005. Wallace aims to persuade his audience that, “the most obvious, ubiquitous, important realities are often the ones that are the hardest to see and talk about.” Although the intended audience of his speech is the graduates and staff, along with their friends and family, the piece has become quite popular since its delivery. Wallace offers, “nothing less than the truth” and captivates the listeners with his complete honestly. His personal tone lets the audience feel like they are a part of the conversation, rather than just receiving it. Wallace successfully conveys his message that society is blind to the world around them through the use of logic, humility and emotional appeals.
Martin Luther King Jr. and George Wallace both had opposing viewpoints on the civil rights movement. In 1963, George Wallace wrote the Inaugural Address and Martin Luther king Jr. wrote the “I have a dream” speech. In George Wallace’s speech, George had a calm tone
In modern times, the importance of liberal arts is questioned. The article “Myth: A Liberal Arts Education is Becoming Irrelevant” by Carol T. Christ makes the argument that a liberal arts education provides a broader range of knowledge which is useful because it produces a critically thinking student. Obtaining a career is the main focus of college education. Knowing this, Christ emphasizes how a liberal arts education is useful when looking for employment. She refutes the conception that a liberal arts education is irrelevant in today’s society by identifying the useful qualities it provides the employers look for such as, “Flexibility, creativity, critical thinking, strong communication skills (particulary writing)” (Christ,
Long story short, life is hard, these kids don't know that yet, as they're practically still children when they graduate. By using the strategies Wallace chose, his message was made clear in a creative
In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.
September 11, 2001, is a day that will go down in history and never be forgotten. On this day in time, Islamic terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York City, as well as The Pentagon building in Washington, D.C. The terrorists, who were affiliated with Al Qaeda, were led by the one and only, Osama Bin Laden. Nine days after this devastating attack on our country, President George W. Bush addressed Congress with an unplanned State of the Union address. Bush used great amounts of tragedy with a direct vital tone to deliver a very important message. Ultimately, this message would reach out to the American people as a whole, not only for remembrance of the people who lost their lives, but also as a plan of action for what would lie ahead.
George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” is a speech in which he talks about the catastrophic event on September eleventh, 2001. Two airplanes crash into the Twin Towers in New York City on this day, shocking the entire world. He addresses this speech to the people of America on the night of the disastrous event, to let the people of the United States know what is going on. This speech explains how the United States is a strong country, the motives behind the event, as well as to bring the United States together and stronger.
...old, xenophobic white men don’t want just anyone off the street joining them for intellectual discussions over Sunday tea . This is why Wallace advocates for students in high school and college to learn SWE; if students are able to present themselves in a more erudite and intellectual manner by using SWE, it can provide them with more opportunities to ascend the “social ladder” as they will have a stronger foundation for academic and professional success. Using SWE will not guarantee that a student will become a doctor or a lawyer, however, they will have the opportunity to expand their education and achieve that ranking if they wish.
In recent years, many have debated whether or not a college education is a necessary requirement to succeed in the field of a persons’ choice and become an outstanding person in society. On one hand, some say college is very important because one must contribute to society. The essay Three Reasons College Still Matters by Andrew Delbanco shows three main reasons that students should receive their bachelor’s degree. On the other hand, many question the point of wasting millions of dollars on four years or maybe more to fight for highly competitive jobs that one might not get. Louis Menand wrote an article based on education titled Re-Imagining Liberal Education. This article challenges the main thought many americans have after receiving a secondary education. Louis Menand better illustrates the reasons why a student should rethink receiving a post secondary education better than Andrew Delbanco’s three reasons to continue a person’s education.
As students and parents are looking into colleges, their minds need to be open and free of biases. Sanford Ungar’s essay can help broaden the mindset of families, and even help make a decision to attend a liberal arts college. Ungar uses various techniques in his essay that make it effective. Not only does he discredit the misperceptions of liberal arts, but he also approaches his writing with etiquette that appeals to his readers. In his essay, Ungar uses three main appeals: reason, emotion, and ethics...
Yet Wallace tells his audience that they can control this at times, that they can show sympathy for the giant SUV that just cut them off on the high way, or the old lady who could be making her final trip to the grocery store. Wallace reasons that being thinking in this mindset is not our unconscious thought, that in order to embrace this empathetic and compassionate train of thought “it depends on what you want to consider.” (208). Informing his audience that awareness is essential and Wallace also declares that “you get to consciously decide what has meaning and what doesn’t.” (208).
In This is Water, Wallace effectively uses logical reasoning and the parable of the religious man and the atheist man to explain how consciousness is a choice, not an unalterable state. To do this, Wallace states that in many cases, “A huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded.” Using logical reasoning, Wallace’s own admission reminds his audience that they are also often wrong, as, logically, humans are not perfect and make periodic mistakes. Once he establishes that people can be wrong, he returns to the parable of the two men and claims “…the exact same experience can mean two totally different things to two different people, given those people's two different belief templates and two different ways of constructing meaning from experience.” This idea is familiar to his educated audience, as he claims it is one of the primary foundations of a liberal arts education. Thus, Wallace uses his audienc...
It is Addison’s belief that one enters the college experience as a rookie (Addison 213). This theory contradicts Murray’s thought that not every person would benefit from a college-level liberal education. Addison also believes that ...
The philosopher is presenting complex image with many aspects to illustrate relatively simple problem which makes his writing appealing only to narrow circle of people usually enough educated to find an absolute truth by themselves. His style is too complicated to be appropriate for masses; complicated vocabulary and syntax that is not used anymore. Plato’s relating to the real problem right in the end of his work giving no time to think about it throughout his argument. Basically what he is doing is explaining the problem and then presenting it. In the end he just leaves the reader all alone without further explanation. David Foster Wallace has also tried to convince people that there is something more to the world that can be seen. However, Wallace’s Commencement Speech is very different from Plato’s allegory. I his speech Wallace is presenting his ideas in a simple manner by short stories that anyone can relate to and because of this it makes him more convincing and persuasive. Right in the beginning of the speech he relates to the main topic by story about fishes that allows his audience to think about the main problem along his speech. This move is undoubtedly more effective because it lets audience focus and contemplate on what is important, on what relates to the main topic during whole