'Rhetorical Analysis Of Cepeda's Poster Girl'

1042 Words3 Pages

Poster boys are not perfect, nor should we expect them to be they are human and they represent the very best of a specific group of people. Cepeda’s short sidedness toward the main point of the story shared by Vargas is put on display throughout the article. It takes from her article when you get the sense of her not being willing to attempt to connect with him on a deeper level than just trying to point out all the wrong he did. In attempting to demonize Vargas for his decisions, Cepeda gives light on what many ignorant people in the world believe, thus questioning her effectiveness in swaying the readers. Her methods and choice of words make her seem as though she's just not willing to understand his perspective. Cepeda’s logic with the …show more content…

(Cepeda 2) Cepeda's try at defining poster boy which is a very subjective term is done inappropriately because poster boy can easily be changed to meet one's expectations. In this specific case it’s flawed to say that he doesn't fit what she deems to be the poster boy because if he isn’t qualified then who realistically fits that mold. Vargas in a decision that was made for him, was sent to the United States and had to adapt and evolve so he could survive, he should be who everyone looks up to. Not only did he work for everything he accomplished, but he made sure that while his method of getting into the country was not legal when given the opportunity most immigrants want he took full …show more content…

Cepeda’s ingenious attempt at trying to connect with Vargas is done in such a way that dare I say could even be classified as insulting. “The rest of Vargas’ story makes the stomach ache”. (Cepeda 2) It’s hard to believe that someone with the mindset of no matter what the outcome is the ends do not justify the means could have a genuine reaction to Varga’s heartfelt story. Cepeda tries to show you in her first half of the article how she sympathizes with Vargas when in reality it is as clear as day that she does not agree with vargas and other illegals who “make it” per say, through the actions that he took.“What the general public was supposed to take from Vargas’ “heroic” admission is that illegal immigrants generally are people who don’t mean to break any laws, tell any lies or hurt anyone’s feelings but are forced to do so because of the draconian and unjust immigration laws in this country.” (Cepeda 2) She tries to put on a facade of understanding when the reality of the situation is that she has not had a first hand experience of what illegal immigrant goes through to determine what is deemed right or

Open Document