Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of obamas race speech
Minority issues in america
Minority issues in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of obamas race speech
On September 2, 2015, current United States Ambassador to the United Nations and former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley gave a speech titled, “Haley: GOP Approach to Minorities is ‘Cold.’” In this conference hosted by The National Press Club, Mrs. Haley addressed the conflicts within the Republican Party involving minorities. She stated, “The problem for our party is that our approach often appears cold and unwelcoming to minorities. That is shameful, and it has to change.” (“Text of Gov.”). During the speech, she used compelling pathos and a strong yet hopeful tone to relate to the audience.With these rhetorical devices, she also used open hand gestures and emphasis of keywords such as “us”, “shameful”, and the phrase “... [this] has to …show more content…
change!” (“Text of Gov.”). The purpose of Mrs. Haley’s speech was to open the eyes of her audience to the problems that the Republican Party has been coddling. Her audience is those apart of a minority, those within the Republican Party, and the supporters of Nikki Haley herself. In her speech, Mrs.
Haley used compelling pathological emotions to relate and grasp the attention of her audience. For instance, when asked about the future election of 2016 she replied, “... that’s what’s important to me, I’ve got a son in middle school, I’ve got a daughter who’s a senior in high school, I’ve got a husband who just came back from Afghanistan a year ago...” (“Haley: GOP”). After mentioning her family and their importance in her life the crowd yelled and applauded; this provides evidence that the audience does not consider Nikki Haley a stereotypical politician, but someone just like her supporters, someone who has been apart of the common man’s struggles and responsibilities. This is important in the relevance of her speech because, it brings a small insight of her life to light in this political conference, and makes the audience feel more comfortable with her professional opinion. Without this glimpse of personal information Nikki Haley would perhaps have come off as cold and unattached to the true topic at the matter; the problems between the Republican Party and minorities that have been coddled far too …show more content…
long. During Nikki Haley’s speech she also uses a strong yet hopeful tone to communicate her concern with the topic. One example of this tone is shown when Mrs. Haley speaks about a previous conflict her family had with discrimination at a local produce market, “The importance of that story, to me, is not in pointing out that my family and I have faced discrimination in the past… It is to make this clear: a lot of people make the mistake of thinking the South is still like that today. It’s not. I know. I lived through it.” (Pippin, Zach). With this quote Mrs. Haley informs the audience in a strong tone of her experience with past discrimination. However, when Mrs. Haley states that the south has changed and implies that it is a better environment for those apart of minorities she uses a hopeful tone to communicate how the south really has changed. Without these uses of tone Nikki Haley would have perhaps came off as monotone and disinterested in the future of minorities in the south. As well as these rhetorical devices Mrs. Haley also uses open hand gestures while addressing the audience. This helps boosts her claim because it makes the audience feel welcome to what she has to say rather than feeling demanded or threatened by the use of a clenched fist or pointed finger. For instance, when mentioning the civil rights movement she says, “It’s a movement in which every person, regardless of their skin color is treated equally under the law.”(Pippin, Zach). She uses smooth open hand movements when speak rather than using aggressive hand gestures that other politician might have taken advantage of. Nikki Haley avoids such threatening body language by using the more natural gestures she obtained throughout the speech, this also makes her appear comfortable and relaxed in front of this large crowd. Without these open hand gestures Mrs. Haley would have appeared as demanding towards her audience rather than obtaining the desired appearance of calm cool and collective speecher. Another use stylistic speaking that Nikki Haley employed in her speech is the emphasis of keywords such as “us”, “shameful”, and the phrase “...
[this] has to change!” (“Text of Gov.”). An example of this can be observed seen when Mrs. Haley speaks on the topic of removing the confederate flag, “One of the lessons of the flag controversy is that if we stop shouting and start listening, we get more accomplished. We should all listen to each other more – we will all benefit from walking in someone else’s shoes.” She emphasises the words, “we”, “all”, “benefit” and “stop” (Pippin, Zach). Without this stylistic emphasis Nikki Haley cold not have expressed her true concern with the topic at
hand. Nikki Haley related to her audience through enthralling emotions, but still kept a strong tone with emphasis of certain vocabulary and made the audience feel comfortable by using open hand gestures rather than a closed fist. Mrs. Haley’s use of certain rhetorical devices was significant in this speech due relevance of her specific audience and allow her to grasp the attention of those in the Republican Party and those apart of a minority. Her speech is still important today due to the continuing conflicts that many minorities are encountering on a daily basis; she took the gripping topic of discrimination and addressed it to an entire audience with confidence and empowerment needed to convey her argument of change. Without the use of specific rhetorical devices, a stylistic voice, and appropriate body language, Mrs. Haley’s speech would have been dull and uncompelling towards her specific audience.
Leading into the topic of the current political and racial status of the United States today. This opening statement allows the article to open in a neutral standpoint before expressing negative views against Trump and his beliefs. In response, the audience feels prompted to bring more attention to the damage and impact that Trump and his racially biased views have caused the United States and people of color to endure.
He begins by raising doubts about the accuracy of Reagan’s beloved vision of America as the “Shining City on a Hill”, alluding to emotion-stirring stories of the homeless in Chicago and mothers who struggle to feed their children. His use of ethos poses the question “If our very own president doesn’t know what’s going on in our country, what makes him qualified to lead this country into a bright future?” Most of Cuomo’s speech challenges the decisions and qualifications of President Ronald Reagan, making him appear as the country’s enemy. Cuomo repeatedly appeals to his audience’s emotions by referring to the country as a family who has been separated by the ideals of Republicans, arguing that they divide the nation into the “lucky and the left out, the royalty and the rabble”(275). His metaphoric “wagon train” of America calls for Democratic action, as the Republicans can’t make it to the frontier “unless some of the old, some of the young, some of the weak are left behind”(274). Once again, Cuomo articulates his vision of the nation’s people as a “family” by finishing off with the story of his own family. He uses both pathos and ethos to confirm that, being the son of immigrants who worked hard to provide for their family, his appeals are credible. His use of vivid imagery like witnessing his
In 1994 Renown College Professor Nikki Giovanni published a breath taking book that contains guidance to black college students on how to academically apply their selves in College, and she teaches them how to deal with the ignorance of white people from sharp tonged comebacks to gaining a Professors respect. Along the way The Article “Campus Racism 101” states Giovanni has acquired a tenure, she has a teaching position for life at the predominately white student body Virginia Tech. (Writing on the River 11) Nikki Giovanni’s “Campus Racism 101” gives advice to black students on how to succeed in College, appeals to Giovanni’s credibility, and appeals to the emotions of racism all in order to educate how black College students need to deal with ignorance on a College campus.
Elias Boudinot’s speech “An Address to the Whites” was first given in the First Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia, in May 1826. The speech sought white American support of the Cherokees in further assimilation into white society and for aid in this endeavour, as well as making a case for coexistence in an effort to protect the Cherokee Nation. Specifically, the “Address to the Whites” was part of Boudinot’s fundraising campaign for a Cherokee assembly and newspaper. Boudinot himself was Cherokee, though he had been taken from America and educated by missionaries at the Foreign Mission School in Cornwall. This upbringing gave Boudinot a unique perspective on the issue of the Cherokee position
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
Imagine moving to America and dreaming about riches, an easy life, no worries, safety and freedom. I hate to break it to you but… that is not that easy. To make the transition easier, it would be beneficial to learn English. This can be accomplished by forcing oneself to communicate with other Americans in English. Another way is to embrace the American culture. Finally, lose the false hopes. The streets are not lined in gold and money doesn't grow on trees. If you follow this you are sure to succeed!
The reader learns, in depth, that Senator Clinton is an intellectual, a voracious reader, a policy expert, a strong advocate for the poor, a guardian of children, a clever politician, an outstanding American citizen, a committed mother, a dedicated wife, and a never-say-die woman who seeks power without apology. That which may be new to the reader, however, is the profound impact Hillary's family and upbringing had on her political beliefs and eventual political career, which has made her into somewhat of a celebrity in the American culture.
Tim Wise is a white man who grew up in Tennessee. His book, “Dear White America,” was written in the format of a letter from a white person in America to other white people in America. He understands that his audience will likely be mostly made up of people of color or those that already agree with him, but he wrote this to remind himself and others of the advantages of being white in the United States. Wise has views on racism that may be considered radical or offensive to many white people. He uses both personal experience and theoretical experiences to illustrate and explain the themes and ideas presented. The major theme of this book is not, as some may assume, “black vs. white” or “people of color vs. white people.” The major themes of “Dear White America” are accepting white privilege, and how to use white privilege to bring about change in multiracial relationships and societal structures.
She wants the audience on the edge of their seats, leaning in to confirm that they are engaged. Haley looks up from her papers and makes eye contact when making firm points, so she knows that the other ambassadors are listening to her. Among her most powerful points, she says “civil defense centers have been attacked in order to paralyze the medical response” in order to “increase the suffering of the survivors” (Haley). Furthermore, at the close of her speech, she states, “Either way, the United States will respond,” She is trying to gather support from other UN countries, so the U.S. isn’t alone. She wants the UN to understand that the United States is prepared to take action, and the nations that are apart of the UN are obligated as part of a greater authority to support and contribute accordingly. because it’s not just a US problem, not a Syrian problem, it’s a world problem. It is strange that the world cries out for America's help, but the world complains about America's nationalism. When the United States becomes the world's police, people complain. The world's problems aren’t just for the U.S. to combat, it’s everyone in the UN’s job to fight tyranny. Haley’s call to action to the UN is that they unify in an effort to stop and prevent tyranny in the world. It is interesting that just by her strong gaze she conveys that she wants to help the
. Elias Boudinot and William Apess both fight for the rights of their peoples. In what way are their rhetorical strategies different?
In culmination, Mary Fisher’s address to the Republican National Convention can be considered a success. Fisher opened the eyes of her audience using the rhetorical devices of ethos, logos, and pathos. She not only made the audience understand the dire nature of the issue of HIV, but she challenged them to be civically responsible, and no longer treat those afflicted by the HIV virus with hate and fear. Most importantly, Mary Fisher made it clear to her audience that the HIV/AIDS affliction should not be kept hush hush, or as a “whisper”, but rather we as American people should choose to see the problem and act and up for a safer future.
The application of allusions successfully helps President Obama emphasize the idea of equality and unity. The author supports this when he mentions the "blood drawn by lash"; referring to slavery. This quotation lets us reflect on the struggle slaves were obliged to endure in order to gain equality with the rest of the White population. He later alludes the preamble to the United States' Constitution when he says, "We, the people..." The preamble is extremely critical to the history of the United States since it summarizes the basic rights that guarantees equality for all. Lastly, President Obama ends with a reference to the Declaration of Independence when he mentions the unalienable rights of "life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.".
This final examination essay explores the content of Hillary Clintons 2008 Democratic National Convention speech. The examination of the speech will be conducted through critical analysis of 4 central areas; first, was Hillary’s speech appropriate for and clearly articulated to the audience, second, I will scrutinize 3-5 aspects that helped or hindered her with regards to nonverbal and verbal delivery to determine if her delivery was appropriate for the speech act, third, analyze and determine if the main points are clear, given the specific psychological context of the speech and if they are appropriate for the purpose of the spectators, and lastly, and analysis of the evidence she presented was suitable given the nature of the situation and purpose of the speech and weather citations offered appropriate for the context?
The film features interviews of many intelligent, successful and powerful women and allies, from journalists to politicians to television personalities to mayors, academics and writers. For example, politics is an recurring theme throughout the play. During the interviews, Nancy Pelosi and Condoleezza Rice reflect on the common barriers they faced as a women in politics. In addition, the film provided an analysis of how media treated women politicians such as Sarah Palin and Hilary Rodham Clinton. This provides the audience with multiple perspectives on the sexism women face in society as well as learn about issue
Minority groups in America are a predominant aspect in Trump’s transient clip. Women, people of colour and international students all make an appearance; all expressing their beliefs for Trump’s suitability as a president. These momentary appearances manifest Trump’s aim