Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis flashcards
Rhetorical analysis flashcards
Everyday life examples of rhetoric
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This Earth is precious” is a transcription of Chief Seattle’s reply to the president of the United States due to the fact they tried to buy their lands. It is thought that this speech was given in 1845, but in fact, the date, location, and the actual contents of it are unclear and disputed. Chief Seattle was a warrior who tried to defend his people, protecting them, and their culture, “considered barbaric by the Washington government of the white invaders of America.” It is undeniable that Seattle’s letter is completely effective and eloquent, making clear the fact that for them their lands are not only something to own, but to respect. In his writing, Seattle invites the Washington government to think about what they want to do, by using certain literary devices, such as, rhetorical questions, irony, euphemism, hyperbole, etc. …show more content…
To begin with, the presence of rhetorical questions is important throughout the letter, and its role is fundamental to achieve Settle’s aim.
Through them, they invite the Washington government to reflect on what they want to do and its consequences. By using those impactful questions, he is able to make the white man’s offer sounds ridiculous, as he asks himself “how can they buy or sell the sky, the warmth of the land?”. Clearly, those things cannot be bought with any money in the world.
In addition, the use of irony is one of the most effective and valuable devices in this literary piece and Seattle use it so precisely that in some parts of the text is implicit. When he says “The sight of your cities pains the eyes of the red man. But perhaps it is because the red man is a savage and does not understand”, he is being very ironical. He knows that the “white man” considers his culture as the only one, the superior one, and he makes it clear by this play on words. Deep inside him, he knows that they think the red man as a
barbarian. Another important device is the use of personification and sensorial images. They give us the notion that Chief Seattle and his people consider nature as part of them. They do not believe they are the owners of the land; in fact, they worship it as a way of showing their gratitude for what the earth has provided them. For instance, he uses a lot of personification, giving the earth and its elements (water, air, flowers, etc.) human characteristics, because for him the latter is his God: “The air is precious to the red man, for all the things share the same breath-the beast, the tree, the man, they all share the same breath.” And also he considers the rivers part of his family “The rivers are our brothers, they quench our thirst.” What is more, sensorial images are present in most of the writing so as to emphasize the land has for them:” The clatter only seems to insult the ears. and what is there to life if a man cannot hear the lonely cry of the whippoorwill or the arguments of the frogs around a pond at night?" All in all, it can be said that Seattle’s use of literary devices to convey his message, is effective and powerful. He makes the Washington government to think about their “offer”, which sounds ridiculous for them, as he and his people see the earth as something sacred, impossible to buy and sell. Probably, his rhetorical questions will remain in the USA president for the rest of his life, reminding him that some things cannot be sold and that “For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected.”
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
In Florence Kelley's speech to the people attending the NAWSA convention, she uses emotional appeal to motivate her audience to convince their male counterparts to legalize voting for women, and also to persuade the males to help put an end to child labor.
As majority of the narrative in this poem is told through the perspective of a deceased Nishnaabeg native, there is a sense of entitlement to the land present which is evident through the passage: “ breathe we are supposed to be on the lake … we are not supposed to be standing on this desecrated mound looking not looking”. Through this poem, Simpson conveys the point of how natives are the true owners of the land and that colonizers are merely intruders and borrowers of the land. There is an underlying idea that instead of turning a blind eye to the abominations colonizers have created, the natives are supposed to be the ones enjoying and utilising the land. The notion of colonizers simply being visitors is furthered in the conclusion of the poem, in which the colonizers are welcomed to the land but are also told “please don’t stay too long” in the same passage. The conclusion of this poem breaks the colonialistic idea of land belonging to the colonizer once colonized by putting in perspective that colonizers are, in essence, just passerbys on land that is not
“Give me knowledge, so I may have kindness for all” -Sitting Bull . In the speech by Chief Powhatan to John Smith he expresses how he wants peace between the English and the Powhatan people. Chief Powhatan wants to resolve the argument peacefully. He attempts to persuade Captain John Smith to have a peaceful relationship with both groups .His use of figurative language throughout the speech is highly important because this makes the speech so powerful and recognized through history.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were
Native American’s place in United States history is not as simple as the story of innocent peace loving people forced off their lands by racist white Americans in a never-ending quest to quench their thirst for more land. Accordingly, attempts to simplify the indigenous experience to nothing more than victims of white aggression during the colonial period, and beyond, does an injustice to Native American history. As a result, historians hoping to shed light on the true history of native people during this period have brought new perceptive to the role Indians played in their own history. Consequently, the theme of power and whom controlled it over the course of Native American/European contact is being presented in new ways. Examining the evolving
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
In An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States, historian Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s reexamines the American historical record and moves it passed the typical narratives of colonialism, revolution, and American exceptionalism. Dunbar-Ortiz’s analysis will impact the field of Native Studies and even general United States history with its examination and focus on settler colonialism as a genocidal policy. It is, as Dunbar-Ortiz argues, impossible to write American history without the acknowledgment of Indigenous peoples. Dunbar-Ortiz shatters the myth of “free land” and conquered Natives. She instead focuses on “the absence of a colonial framework (7),” which she believes is the reason that most historians overlook Indigenous history. In other words, historians need to view colonization as an ongoing process and not a
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Henry Miller’s excerpt, through its implications of isolationism, reveals the flaws of Andrew Jackson’s support of the Indian Removal. Although the term “Manifest Destiny” had not been coined during Jackson’s presidency, the sentiment of expansion remained omnipresent. The South, especially eager to expand their farming lands, fervidly supported removing the Native Americans from their territory. Jackson and Southerners “[regarded] the entire world as [their] home.” However, they did not “work
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
The movement westward during the late 1800’s created new tensions among already strained relations with current Native American inhabitants. Their lands, which were guaranteed to them via treaty with the United States, were now beginning to be intruded upon by the massive influx of people migrating from the east. This intrusion was not taken too kindly, as Native American lands had already been significantly reduced due to previous westward conquest. Growing resentment for the federal government’s Reservation movement could be felt among the native population. One Kiowa chief’s thoughts on this matter summarize the general feeling of the native populace. “All the land south of the Arkansas belongs to the Kiowas and Comanches, and I don’t want to give away any of it” (Edwards, 203). His words, “I don’t want to give away any of it”, seemed to a mantra among the Native Americans, and this thought would resound among them as the mounting tensions reached breaking point.
His appeals to ethos start when he expresses this sentiment “Your God is not our God! Your God loves your people and hates mine! He folds his protecting arms lovingly around the paleface and leads them by the hand as a father leads an infant son. But he has forsaken His Red children, if they really are his” here Seattle begs the Americans to reconsider their stance as his people are rapidly “ebbing away.” By contrasting the stance of God between the two sides it shows the subjugation the people have been brought under as they have no rights, not even under a perceived omniscient and loving