A Rhetorical Analysis of “Managing ADHD in children: Are you doing enough?” Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) must be managed correctly by children, their parents, and their physicians. According to The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 60, No 4, there are several new developments in the treatment of this disorder that require the attention of physicians (Withrow et al., 2011). The purpose of this article is to inform people about ADHD and how it must be treated. “Recommendations focus on patient (and parent) education, and on medication, monitoring, and following up” (Withrow et al., 2011, para. 4). The authors demonstrate a precise use of logos, pathos, and ethos to convey a sense of a professional approach to the diagnosis of …show more content…
ADHD. Summary ADHD is a disorder that must be carefully controlled by capable physicians.
The document states that an untreated case of ADHD can have serious effects on the lives of both children and their parents (Withrow, Hash, & Holten, 2011). Before treating children, physicians must look for a coexisting conditions which could affect the diagnosis and treatments of ADHD. Parents and children should aid their physicians by using the support of their community and the resources of their school (Withrow et al., 2011). Physicians should take several courses of action: educating the parents and patients, monitoring patients for the emergence and severity of side effects, and evaluating the treatment each year. Pharmacotherapy, or therapy using pharmaceutical drugs, is another accepted way for physicians to treat children with ADHD. The documents says that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves certain drugs for the treatment of ADHD (Withrow et al., 2011). The list of approved drugs include the psychostimulants D- and DL-methylphenidate, atomoxetine, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, and a noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (Withrow et al., 2011). To see if a child’s behavior demonstrates the symptoms of ADHD, an analysis of that child’s behavior is needed. According to this document, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) emphasises classroom behavioral interventions and parental training in behavioral therapy (Withrow et al., 2011). The AAP considers both of these to be of …show more content…
more efficient than cognitive behavioral therapy (Withrow et al., 2011). Audience and Purpose The purpose of this informative document is to tell physicians of the various ways in which children with ADHD can be managed. New developments in the treatment have surfaced and there are several new diagnoses of which physicians should be made aware. The article makes it clear that physicians should inform parents and children about the new developments in the diagnosis of ADHD. The document is very specific in its delivery of information about ADHD, reflecting the pertinence of the information. The document explicitly states what “physicians should do,” then goes on to list the precautions they should take (Withrow et al., 2011). The specific audience is the physicians who must inform the patients of the new diagnoses, but parents of children with ADHD are also targeted in this document. In fact, these parents and concerned individuals to whom this information concerns are the ones who can make the most of this information, even though they are not explicitly stated as the recipients of this information. Rhetorical Stance The rhetorical stance of this document is purely informative. The authors clearly and concisely present the new information about the treatment of ADHD. They seem to think that ADHD is a serious issue and must be addressed, but do not give any evidence for why it must be so intensely diagnosed. The document uses logos, ethos, and pathos to tell of the new ways to care for people with ADHD, and stresses the need for a response. Pathos The document written for The Journal of Family Practice about ADHD uses pathos efficiently to appeal to the emotions of the intended audience by explaining that children with ADHD may not be getting the treatment they deserved.
The article’s title evokes the emotions of anyone who is treating a child with ADHD by asking the question, “are you doing enough?” (Withrow et al., 2011). The authors of this document present basic information with the underlying assumption that there are children with ADHD who are insufficiently diagnosed. With these subtleties, the authors demonstrate their intentions to have this behavioral disorder heavily medicated. Underdiagnosed children, according to the document, must be medicated properly for their own good. The readers are put into the perspective of physicians who must acknowledge the severity of ADHD and must respond to these recommendations set forth by this
article. Ethos The authors of the document establish their credibility through ethos by listing their credentials in the margins. The first one on the list is Leanna M. Withrow, DO, who lists Clinton Memorial Hospital/ University of Cincinnati, Family Medicine Residency, as her credentials. Under her name is Philip A.K. Hash, DO, PhD, who lists the University of Kentucky, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lexington, as his credentials. Lastly is Keith B. Holten, MD, who lists Berger Health System, Circleville, Ohio, as his credentials (Withrow et al., 2011). According to further research on the Healthgrades web site (“Healthgrades”, 2015), Withrow, Hash, and Holten have all received positive reviews of their diagnosis of their patients, and, therefore, are an authority on this type of medical diagnosis. Logos Reading this article will show that the authors are intent on treating ADHD with every diagnosis that they know. The authors use logos to appeal to the reader’s logic by presenting information about the treatment of this disorder in an assuming manner about the reader’s relationship to ADHD (Withrow et al., 2011). Unbeknownst to the reader, the article assumes that anyone who is reading this document has some relationship to ADHD, whether it is a patient seeking more information of their disorder, a parent of a patient wanting to help, or a doctor finding new ways to aid their patients. The logical choice after reading about these new diagnosis is to use the information to help medicate those with ADHD, which is the final goal of the authors. Conclusion The authors of the article about ADHD in The Journal of Family Practice use of logos, pathos, and ethos effectively relay new information of the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in a professional atmosphere. They specifically state what physicians should do in certain cases, but also provide information that is helpful for those people in situations related to ADHD. According to the document, children with ADHD are not getting sufficient treatment, thus calling upon to the emotions of the reader. The authors are very qualified doctors, establishing ethos in the document through their reputation and experience. Finally, the authors appeal to the logic of the reader by telling of the new developments and diagnosis. The reader is to logically reason that if there are new developments, then there must be new treatments. In the end, the authors assert their claim in an evident and distinct manner. References Withrow, Hash, & Holten. Managing ADHD in children: Are you doing enough? (2011). Retrieved from http://www.jfponline.com/home/article/managing-adhd -in-children-are-you-doing-enough/372d47b4c724e7118c04d0307c702cb4.html Healthgrades. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.healthgrades.com
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
As stated previously, medication is the most common option that parents choose for their children. The most common prescriptions are Dexedrine, Cylert, Ritalin, and Adderall. Medication is highly effective. For around 75%-90% of prescribed patients, these work to solve their issues. This is a definite advantage to taking medication is that it is almost guaranteed to work. There are drawbacks to taking medication however; the trial-and-error process, cost of medication, and the side effects that can come with medication. As with any brain chemical medication, there comes a trial-and-error process to determine the right balance and the right amount to really curb the symptoms that come with. Just like any medication that people need to operate, the cost does add up whereas with behavioral therapy, there is no medication to buy and thus no costs. Lastly, there are side effects that come with ADHD. These can be insomnia, nervousness, headaches, and weight loss. Despite all these drawbacks, medication is the fastest and most effective way to treat ADHD (“Identifying and Treating Attention Deficit
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
ADHD is an exceedingly real diagnosis for many children in the United States. Are we over diagnosing our little ones just to keep from dealing with unpleasant behavior? “ On average 1 of every 10 to 15 children in the United States has been diagnosed with the disorder, and 1 in every 20 to 25 uses a stimulant medication” (Mayes, Bagwell, & Erkulwater, 2008). Several believe that virtually all ADHD diagnoses are retractable with appropriate discipline of children instead of being so hasty in medicating them. The material found on the CDC website describes facts about ADHD, it clarifies the signs, symptoms, types, causes, diagnosis tools, and treatment forms of ADHD. What the article neglects to go into is the reality that there is a considerable amount of controversy surrounding ADHD. The CDCs usage of ethos, pathos, and logos and by what method the website manipulates them to affect the reader will be the basis of this paper.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Stimulant drugs are widely used to treat the symptoms of ADHD. These stimulants dramatically reduce the hyperactivity of sufferers and improve their ability to focus, learn and work. Such medication may also improve physical coordination, for instance handwriting and sports. Research completed by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) suggests that these medicines may also help children with an accompanying conduct disorder to control their impulsive, destructive behaviours. The three medications that have been proven by the NIMH to be most effective in both children and adults suffering from ADHD are: methylphenidate (Ritalin), dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine or Dextrostat), and pemoline (Cylert). (NIMH 1999) Yet there is currently much research on the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, such as t...
Every day, doctors are diagnosing kids with ADHD. A diagnosis can come as early as four years old. Doctors evaluate the patient. They also read reports from teachers and or coaches, along with talking with the child’s parents. Typical symptoms of ADHD include: “being in constant motion, squirming and fidgeting, making careless mistakes, not wanting to listen, being easily distracted, losing things, and making careless mistakes” (WebMD, 2014). If a child is diagnosed with ADHD, they may be put on a typical ADHD drug. Medicines that are used to t...
ADHD is a disorder that has been on the rise for several years now. The disorder is one that can cause many impairments to a child’s attention span, making it difficult to concentrate and to keep on task, especially on schoolwork. (Graham, 2007) The statistics have been growing ...
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder, otherwise known as ADHD, is the most common psychiatric condition effecting 9.5% of school-aged children in the United States (intuniv, 2013). If the disorder goes untreated, it will cause more long-term side effects and difficulties for the individual as an adult. Adults who have this condition face several adversities in every day life, such as impulsive behavior, low self-esteem and poor work performance. People are not aware of the complications that come with ADHD in adults. Not knowing the symptoms of the disease can cause people to not be sympathetic when they are interacting with someone with disorder.
The purpose of this research was to describe and understand Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the most effective treatment options that are available today. ADHD is a mental health disorder that affects 3-9% of the population in ways that, if left untreated, can wreak havoc on the mind of the sufferer. It makes concentration difficult, large tasks seem insurmountable, and causes impulsive and hyperactive tendencies. Fortunately, research and experiments have led to new and effective treatments to help those who suffer from this disorder (Dupaul 8). This research examined journal articles and internet sources on the topic to help unlock the complexities of the disorder through scientific research. It also was a way to separate the myths of the disorder from the truths, while discovering the causes, diagnosis methods, and best treatment alternatives to battle this prevalent disorder.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
It has been known since the beginning of time that not all people have the same brain function, social graces or self control. Children have daydreamed, been distracted, wiggled and have been routinely disruptive in classrooms. The condition dubbed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a new name for old behaviors. It has only been the last 40 or so years that these behaviors have become known as a disorder. They were previously accepted, on the most part, as common childhood behavior that would be outgrown. The controversy over the treatment, Ritalin, during the 1960s is when ADHD became well known (Conrad 563). Before that children and their families managed to survive without the labeling and medicating of children who didn’t fit perfectly into the mold. The brain function of a child with ADHD may be different, but who’s to say that difference needs to be changed. The person with ADHD still gets the job done, just differently, with a lot more effort and creativity. There are many who benefit from an ADHD diagnosis, the child is not always one of them.
The lack of a complete understanding of ADHD has led scientists to question how to go about treating ADHD. While at the moment the disorder cannot be cured, they are methods that scientists have come up with to address the symptoms displayed by ADHD. These approaches range all the way from psychotherapy, and cognitive-behavioral therapy, to the prescription of pyschostimulant medications. (3) The most popular of these medications include amphetamines, such as Aderall, and methylphenidates such as Ritalin. (1) The use of such drugs ...
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is broadly described as a neurobehavioral disorder where a person has difficulty paying attention and complying with basic commands. On a biological level, ADHD is hereditary, where a parent passes the disorder to their offspring through genes, while on a cellular level, ADHD affects cell functions such as cellular respiration, more specifically, glucose metabolism (Zimmer, 2009). The public’s perception is clear; ADHD has an over diagnosing problem at a systemic level, where doctors in the United States over diagnose children with ADHD. However, a review of the evidence for and against the argument of ADHD over diagnosing suggest that the disorder does not suffer from an over diagnosing problem. Finally, while there are several methods used to treat ADHD, including medication and behavioral correction therapy, an
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common disorders diagnosed among children in the United States (Lynch, 2013). Its growing prevalence in the United States is becoming a major controversy in the field of Psychology. The public seems to have an opinion as well. Should we be treating children with …