Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
In cold blood analysis essay
Importance of freedom in our life
In cold blood character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: In cold blood analysis essay
Every mind, every thought, everyone revolves around ideas. Many may have a deeper and more complex idea while others vaguely neglect it. Each decision being made has a cause to its effect. In the novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, demonstrates the idea of consequences in one’s responsibility, however only under certain circumstances. Similarly, in Sophie’s World by Jostein Gaarder, Spinoza explicates when we live freely, we develop our natural abilities however one must accept the consequences of such abilities accordingly.
Spinoza was an excommunicated Jew. He viewed aspects from the “perspective of eternity”. He states that we must be free. Additionally, humans will achieve free will because we are constrained by our desires. This philosophy
…show more content…
supports the ideas of In Cold Blood. Spinoza writes, “I shall consider human actions and desires in exactly the same manner” which conveys that thoughts and ideas can be just as evil as the thought and ideas being put into action, “my soul can be the cause of my own ideas” (Gaarder.271). Spinoza explicates that the mind is more-or-less active so the body’s physical activities of the body correlate exactly to the activities of mind. In Cold Blood’s Perry and Dick intertwined with numerous ideas leading up to the murder, their train of thought is the cause to their behavior, therefore the effect is precise upon who is at fault. Wrongdoings has its consequences to itself just like every other action being completed. However, when the mind is at fault, the mind pays for such consequences through treatment rather than the person suffers through mistreatment of prison. As Gaarder encourages the ready to pursue for the truth, he also encourages curiosity of one’s self. People naturally know more about those around them rather than themselves. The discovery of the murdered family label Dick and Perry as "persons unknown".
The inhuman and motiveless evil race upon Holcomb, destroys the peace of a small town. However, those surrounding differ their thoughts after the realizations of Dick and Perry's medical issues, "he [Perry] was under a mental eclipse, deep inside a schizophrenic [ring of] darkness” (Capote.302). Furthermore, based on medical analysis, their actions weren't in their control since they were unable to control their responses. Their past illustrates them as who they has transformed into. Perry dealt with a dysfunctional family. The troubled past Perry experienced extends out towards the rest of his life evidenced by his criminal records. On the contrary, Dick had a better childhood as compared to Perry. However, his matter of fact exudes his arrogance and malicious cruelty. Their label evolves from heartless and cold-blooded to pitiful as the truth of the crime boils down. As they have “overly sensitive to criticism” (Capote.297) ideas, they mutually struggle desperately for recognition. Their frenzied ideas prior to the murder reflects the effect of consequences. Even prior to the murder, Perry compensated for his actions, Perry wouldn’t have crippled his legs if he chose a car over a motorcycle. He could've worked properly if he didn't crippled himself. If he had a good income, it wouldn't be necessary for him to steal. He wouldn't be in jail if he didn't steal. Consequently, being in jail mirrors
himself as a criminal. Every choice that is made, drives us to the present status. Capote depicts how ordinary thoughts and feelings of frustrations and despair can erupt into an extraordinary crime. Criminality and the term evil isn't how we naturally define it. Instead it is the result of human responses that became amplified and released into a destructive outlet. The realization of one’s self can be surprising news to those blinded from the truth. Many times problems are caused by one’s ideas and actions, however, often times, it is overlooked without awareness of who is at fault. Actions can be impulsive. Many times, the neglect of the truth overwhelms the truth. Consequently, the aftermath can be a loan of a lifetime. Repaying each neglect, each burden, each endurance to the person of the other side.
In Cold Blood is the true story of a multiple murder that rocked the small town of Holcomb, Kansas and neighboring communities in 1959. It begins by introducing the reader to an ideal, all-American family, the Clutters; Herb (the father), Bonnie (the mother), Nancy (the teenage daughter), and Kenyon (the teenage son). The Clutters were prominent members of their community who gained admiration and respect for their neighborly demeanors.
In the novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, the author skillfully orders information and articulates his word choice in order to successfully tell the story. Capote chooses to include certain events before others to show the reader the development of the case caused a change in the overall feelings of characters such as Alvin Dewey. Alvin, the detective who desperately searched for the Clutter killers reads, “on the first page of the Kansas City Star, a headline he had long awaited: Die On Rope For Bloody Crime,” which portrays to the reader that he was relieved after months to know that they were sentenced to death. (337) By including the word choice “he had long awaited” the reader may assume that he is pleased by this outcome. (337) However,
This lesson will examine the impact of Harper Lee on Truman Capote 's true-crime novel, 'In Cold Blood. ' Lee helped her childhood friend with much of the research for the book, although she was not credited when the book was published.
Most people believe that everyone gets what they deserve. That all bad actions deserve consequences. To many, that is what the so-called “justice” system is for. Criminals are supposed to be punished by the law, but is it always fair to the criminals? What if one of those criminals had an awful life growing up and just was unable to stay out of trouble? It is just this question that Truman Capote addresses in his book, In Cold Blood. Throughout the book, Capote creates sympathy for Perry Smith while claiming the justice system is flawed in the way it punishes the wrong people.
In this day and age the term “murder” is coined as a word used in everyday language, albeit fifty years ago in the [rural] heartland of America, that word evoked emotion out of the entire town’s population. Prior to writing In Cold Blood, Truman Capote had written several pieces that lead him to writing a piece of literature that would infuse fiction and nonfiction, thus In Cold Blood was created, albeit after six years of research (“Truman” 84). "Truman Capote is one of the more fascinating figures on the American literary landscape, being one of the country's few writers to cross the border between celebrity and literary acclaim…He contributed both to fiction and nonfiction literary genres and redefined what it meant to join the otherwise separate realms of reporting and literature." ___ In Cold Blood takes place in the rural heartland in America, capturing the lives of the Clutter family in the days preceding their murder. The story shifts to the murderers, Dick Hickock, Perry Smith, and the lives of the men prior to the events that ultimately unfold in the murder of the Clutters, although the actual events of the murder are not revealed until later in the story through Perry’s flashbacks. At this point of the story the narration switches between the fugitives and the investigation lead by Detective Alvin Dewey of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. Truman Capote's novel In Cold Blood delineates justice in order to depict the disruption of an all-American society.
This passage when Capote begins to introduce Perry more in depth. From his childhood to later on in his life. Perry’s way of life as a child was a tough one, in which his mother put him in a “catholic orphanage. The one where the Black Widows were always at me. Hitting me. Because of wetting the bed…They hated me, too.” Capote’s use of short sentence syntax creates the effect of emphasizing the horrible and dramatic conditions Perry had to live with. Also, the nuns of the orphanage are described as “Black Widows,” a metaphor, to make it seem like it was truly terrible. The color black associates with death and when metaphorically used to describe a nun, it creates sympathy for Perry. Later in the passage, capote creates a short narrative of Perry’s experience in war. “Perry, one balmy evening in wartime 1945…” The storytelling helps understand more about Perry in the way he thinks and acts. The atmosphere of this passage is a sad mood. It talks about the terrible childhood and early life of Perry. It is clear that no one ever cared for Perry and it affected him dramatically.
In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote, is a nonfiction piece that is based on murders that occurred in Holcomb, Kansas on November 15th, 1959. This book seems to be banned for sex, violence, and profanity. Even though it contains sex, violence, and profanity, It shouldn’t be banned because suppressing such literature not only deprives them of developing their own creativity and uniqueness but will also deprive them of the real world and If students are restricted to a library full of prancing ponies and perfect worlds they're developing a false pretense that we live in a perfect little world.
These two men, both coming from different backgrounds, joined together and carried out a terrible choice that rendered consequences far worse than they imagined. Living under abuse, Perry Smith never obtained the necessary integrity to be able to pause and consider how his actions might affect other people. He matured into a man who acts before he thinks, all due to the suffering he endured as a child. Exposed to a violent father who did not instill basic teachings of life, Smith knew nothing but anger and misconduct as a means of responding to the world. He knew no other life. Without exposure to proper behavior or responsible conduct, he turned into a monster capable of killing an entire family without a blink of remorse. In the heat of the moment, Perry Smith slaughtered the Clutter family and barely stopped to take a breath. What could drive a man to do this in such cold blood? The answer lies within his upbringing, and how his childhood experiences shaped him to become the murderer of a small family in Holcomb, Kansas. ¨The hypothesis of unconscious motivation explains why the murderers perceived innocuous and relatively unknown victims as provocative and thereby suitable targets for aggression.¨ (Capote 191). ¨But it is Dr. Statten´s contention that only the first murder matters psychologically, and that when
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
Brian Conniff's article, "Psychological Accidents: In Cold Blood and Ritual Sacrifice," explains how Truman Capote's nonfiction novel demonstrates the psychological trauma that the murderers and the townspeople of Holcomb face after the murders of the Clutter family. Conniff begins his article by stating that in the last twenty-five years imprisonment and execution has reached an all-time high level of obsession among the American public. Since this type of violence has been so normalized it is rarely properly understood (1). With this in mind, prison literature has continually suggested that "the most fortified barriers are not the physical walls and fences between the prison, and the outside world; the most fortified barriers are the psychological walls between the preoccupations of everyday life . . .and the conscious realization that punishment is the most self-destructive kind of national addiction" (Conniff 1).
Furthermore, free will has been closely connected to the moral responsibility, in that one acts knowing they will be res for their own actions. There should be philosophical conditions regarding responsibility such like the alternatives that one has for action and moral significance of those alternatives. Nevertheless, moral responsibility does not exhaust the implication of free will.
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
In respect to the arguments of Ayer and Holbach, the dilemma of determinism and its compatibility with that of free will are found to be in question. Holbach makes a strong case for hard determinism in his System of Nature, in which he defines determinism to be a doctrine that everything and most importantly human actions are caused, and it follows that we are not free and therefore haven’t any moral responsibility in regard to our actions. For Ayer, a compatibilist believing that free will is compatible with determinism, it is the reconciliation and dissolution of the problem of determinism and moral responsibility with free willing that is argued. Ayer believes that this problem can be dissolved by the clarification of language usage and the clarification of what freedom is in relationship to those things that oppose freedom or restrain it. In either case, what is at stake is the free will of an agent, and whether or not that agent is morally responsible. What is to be seen from a discussion of these arguments is the applicability and validity of these two philosophies to situations where one must make a choice, and whether or not that person is acting freely and is thus responsible given his current situation. In this vein, the case of Socrates’ imprisonment and whether or not he acted freely in respect to his decision to leave or stay in prison can be evaluated by the discussion of the arguments presented in respect to the nature of free will in its reconciliation with determinism in the compatibilist vein and its absence in the causality of hard determinism.
We make choices every day, from waking to sleeping our day is composed of choices and the results of these choices. These choices help to shape us to who we are and want to be. But, these results may not be foreseen and may be adverse or favorable depending on the situation. Topics and events in our history ranging from the literacy of common man to unnecessary gun violence were a result of un-foreseen consequences. Our world’s history has been shaped by these consequences forming the world to where we are today.
All in all, each view about the philosophy of free will and determinism has many propositions, objects and counter-objections. In this essay, I have shown the best propositions for Libertarianism, as well as one opposition for it which I gave a counter-objection. Additionally, I have explained the Compatabalistic and Hard Deterministic views to which I gave objections. In the end, whether it is determinism or indeterminism, both are loaded with difficulties; however, I have provided the best explanation to free will and determinism and to an agent being morally responsible.