Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disaster management theories
Disaster management theories
Theoretical review on disaster management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disaster management theories
2. Response of land subsidence in Disaster Risk Management
Disaster Risk Management (DRM) refers to a framework of reducing disaster risk by including management perspective that combines prevention, mitigation, and preparedness with the response. Its purpose is to reduce possible factors that cause risk and to prepare response to it (Baas et al. 2008). It includes action taken by actors, such as public authorities, communities, civil societies, and private sectors, before (pre-disaster), during (disaster), and after a disaster (post-disaster) as a cycle.
Regarding to the land subsidence, most of the responds and efforts taken in pre-disaster phase and some of them are in post-disaster. The pre-disaster phase includes risk identification, risk mitigation, and preparedness (Freeman et al. 2003). Its aim is to strengthen households and community’s capacity and resilience in protecting their livelihoods (Baas et al. 2008). In pre-disaster phase, public authorities’ roles are to respond and mitigate the risk. The response contains the action to forecast
…show more content…
The awareness is the knowledge that is gathered from an interaction between people and environment, which must be kept and be updated to problems (Parkash 2013). It is crucial for disaster management successful (Chopra and Venkatesh 2015) because it can be used to assess degree to which public authorities and land users recognize existing problems. The awareness can be identified from government and parliament’s initiative to design subsidence-related plans (Stork and Sneed 2002). The awareness consists of four components: awareness of living in a risky area, awareness of the status of the land subsidence, awareness of ways to solve the problems, and awareness of action to be taken to prevent upcoming problems. The land users must be seen as active actors in order to increase their awareness on current and exact
On February 4th 1975 in Haicheng China there was a magnitude 7.5 earthquake. Over a period of months there were changes in elevation in land, ground water and unusual animal behavior which are all precursors to an earthquake. Days before the 7.5 magnitude earthquake there were foreshocks that triggered an eviction warning that effectively saved over 150,000 lives or injuries. This is a pro as this forecast saved thousands of lives and had the people of this area (knowing this was a place of seismic activity) took precautions, like that of earthquake resistant buildings, evacuation points, preparing disaster supplies among other preparations the following may not have happened or would have been less of a disaster.
Mitigation: Measures taken to lessen the consequences of disaster events upon our citizens and our
Gene understands that the story does not end with just the damages but also what it contributes to the future. It has brought with it new measures in structural development, social relationships and insurance holding. It is a major step to the lessening of the impact of future disasters.
NIMS is an all-inclusive approach to disaster management across the United States. It covers all jurisdictions and disciplines. NIMS applies to events, hazards and impact regardless of size, location or complexity. NIMS improve organization and teamwork with public and private groups in a variety of disaster management activities. NIM standardizes event management.
Zanskar Valley is having a decline in rainfall due to climate change which is leaving them short on clean water, causing a good deal of health related illnesses and causing many people to relocate to somewhere with plenty of clean water (Document C). Coastal area's population is increasing even though sea levels are rising. This is causing more lives to be in danger when a natural disaster occurs along the coast (Document D). Many places have been taking precautions to insure their safety, including, Southern U.S. states by building retaining walls to keep water out of their cities. Chennai, India was in major need of a retaining wall when two rivers overflowed causing an extreme flood to arise in their city. 1,000 people were injured and 280 were killed because of this flood due to heavy rains (Document E). Many humans don't have the ability to relocate or choose not to and risk getting injured or killed because of flooding, storms or other disasters, these problems need to be fixed before plants and animals face the destruction as
...certain risks and use that knowledge to make solid comprehensive management decisions. These decisions are designed to create a long-term plan that provides solid strategies for preventing and mitigating risk. The risk management also provides Department of homeland security and its partner’s resources and training to educate and prepare members on federal, state, local, tribal and territorial levels to prepare for disaster. Unfortunately, it impossible for our government to completely eliminate risk, whether it is terrorism or man-made or natural disasters, however, with effective risk management, we can rest assure that the risk can be brought down acceptable level where the department of homeland security and their partners are adequately prepared and have the capabilities to handle that risk and lower the potential harm that it could cause the nation long term.
The Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment need the whole community to pass on information, account for population-specific factors, and acknowledge the effects of a threat or hazard. Communities have to be educated and updated on threats and hazards that they may specifically face in order to accurately plan and prepare. All situations are usually handled starting at the lowest level, however, they will also have to discuss on how the federal government will assist if needed. “By providing the necessary knowledge and skills, we seek to enable the whole community to contribute to and benefit from national preparedness.” (FEMA, 2015). Local communities recognize their risks and conclude on how they will handle the significant amount of risks. Local governments discover and address their greatest risks by finishing the Threat and Hazard
Even though humans are building constructions to prevent natural disasters, Mother Nature overpowers them by provoking natural disasters. Some of which is when a tornado hit Queens, New York in 2012; the tornado exceeded the sea shore of the beach, hit benches, and carried and threw away garbage cans (Williams, 2012). Two years before, an earthquake struck Youngstown, and this natural disaster was caused by Youngstown's people (Choi, 2013).In 2008, a devastating flood wet most of New Orleans due to the built up dams. The Hirakud dam was also built to prevent dams and improve irrigation in Orissa, India, but a flood destroyed the town instead; Orissa is small town ad whatever catastrophes happen to it endangers the whole demographic. This incident led to sixty-eight deaths and four and an half million people undergoing hunger hardships, and 2,999km road was ruined too. (Panda, 2008) Therefore, people should realize defying Mother Nature and constructions preventing natural disasters might actually worsen their society's current situation.
The Victorian floods recovery report states that high rainfall caused swelling of major rivers and flash flooding in various regional towns (Moore et al.2012, pp.5). The floods caused significant damage to infrastructure, properties and businesses. It is noted that approximately 4000 residential properties were damaged and approximately 4000 businesses were affected (Moore et al.2012, pp.5). The total damages were approximately $1.3 billion, of which $176 million was lost in tourism value and $269 million in agricultural sector (Moore et al.2012, pp.5). Victorian 2010/11 floods not only caused physical damage, but also had long term personal impacts on the various communities (Department of Human Services, 2011, pp.5). The damages created a great deal of anxiety for the local communities, over the fear of personal safety and concerns about the future damages such events could create (Department of Human Services, 2011, pp.5). The damages caused by 2010/11 floods varied and were place specific (Department of Environment, 2013, pp.34). Hence, land use planning plays a critical role in the identification processes of medium-high risk regions (Department of Environment, 2013,
To begin, the chapter talks about the occurrence of “unnatural hazards” within geographic locations who are most susceptible to natural disasters. Slum housing almost two thirds of the urban population are built on unstable hillsides and on deep gorges surrounding the seismically active Caracas (Davis, 2006). I think it is important to analyze the effects of weaker geographical locations because it does have great bearing on urban planning in developing countries. When countries lack the proper infustructure needed to prevent or deal with natural disasters, it creates a ripple effect of issue that disturbs the ecological system.
Along with the flooding, people are concerned
... although we may never be able to understand exactly what soil failures can occur when a natural disasters take place, as time goes on and testing instruments and materials advance we will hopefully have a better understanding of what we can do to avoid soil failures and come up with a better and more sufficient method of improving the soils structure and strength permanently. While researching the information for this report I feel I have a much better understanding for construction geo-technics and foundations especially regarding the deformation, liquefaction and pile information related to this specific event. I hope to carry the information I have learned from this event into the construction field and apply them towards an authentic project that’s taking place and know that the information, regarding soils, I have given input on will be precise and accurate.
Authorities have attempted to implement codes or regulations, but that has proved to be very difficult tasks becasue there are many variables that effect the dynamic response of buildings. One way to try to avoid disaster is to evaluate seismic risk is to look at a buildings hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and location. Hazards are, for example, landslides ad soil type. Exposure is a building's occupancy and function. Vulnerability is the expected performance of a building's system, and location is how often earthquakes occur in the area. (Lagorio)
Earthquakes belong to the class of most disastrous natural hazards. They result in unexpected and tremendous earth movements. These movements results from dissemination of an enormous amount of intense energy in form of seismic waves which are detected by use of seismograms. The impact of earthquakes leaves behind several landmarks including: destruction of property, extensive disruption of services like sewer and water lines, loss of life, and causes instability in both economic and social components of the affected nation (Webcache 2).
The increase in unpredictable natural disasters events for a decade has led to put the disaster preparedness as a central issue in disaster management. Disaster preparedness reduces the risk of loss lives and injuries and increases a capacity for coping when hazard occurs. Considering the value of the preparatory behavior, governments, local, national and international institutions and non-government organizations made some efforts in promoting disaster preparedness. However, although a number of resources have been expended in an effort to promote behavioural preparedness, a common finding in research on natural disaster is that people fail to take preparation for such disaster events (Paton, 2005; Shaw 2004; Spittal, et.al, 2005; Tierney, 1993; Kenny, 2009; Kapucu, 2008; Coppola and Maloney, 2009). For example, the fact that nearly 91% of Americans live in a moderate to high risk of natural disasters, only 16% take a preparation for natural disaster (Ripley, 2006).