Response Letter To Christianity

950 Words2 Pages

I wanted to write you and address some concerns you had about the validity of the Bible. I know this is a sticking point when it comes to your decision to "subscribe to Christianity," as you put it, so hopefully this will clear up your objections. The Bible is the central focus for our study of God because it is the only written piece of literature available to us that reveals who He is and what He wants for us. I understand your objections to this book, but I implore you to read this letter and consider my arguments. As I have told you before, I am less concerned with the rewards of being right, but more concerned with the consequences of being wrong. Your salvations means a lot to me, so please know that I am writing you this letter out of …show more content…

More specifically, the Bible can't be trusted because of this fact alone. As Christians, we believe that God wrote the Bible though men, they did not write it on their own. That assertion aside, to make a claim that the Bible can't be trusted because it was written by man would mean that we could not trust anything that was ever written. You also have pointed out to me that man is prone to make errors and these errors are proof that the Bible is fallible. While it is true that people make errors, it is not true that people always make errors. If we did, we couldn't trust anyone ever, including ourselves! Moreover, even if there were minor errors in the Bible, that wouldn't mean the central facts are wrong. A book can have typos or errors in some details, but still tell significant …show more content…

We normally refer to these as the Gnostic gospels. The major claim is that the Gnostic gospels were once a part of Christianity and that church councils threw them because they did not fit their narrow view of Christianity, but this simply isn't true. The Gnostic gospels (The gospels of Peter, Judas, Thomas, etc.) were forgeries written 100+ years after the events. They most certainly not written by the people whose names are associated with them (this was a common act of plagiarism in those days). And they were certainly not written by anyone that witnessed the events either. Here is a good way of explaining this. In 2012, two movies about Abraham Lincoln were released: one a historical look at the life of the president (Lincoln), and the other a fast-action paranormal hack-n-slash (Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter). While one was attempting to be true to the history, the other was obviously using a historical character in a fictional context hundreds of years after the age of eyewitnesses. The Gnostic gospels are more like "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter"…borrowing the name of Jesus but not being true to His actual

Open Document