Resistance To Civil Government Rhetorical Analysis

576 Words2 Pages

1 Matthew Klabunde American Literature SA SY24 Civil Disobedience 01 May 2024 Civil Disobedience Choice 2 Thoreau's essay "Resistance to Civil Government" is very similar to the "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King, Jr. Both use the same writing strategies to convince and encourage their readers to become active in civil disobedience to get the government to make a change in society for the betterment of the people. Thoreau uses mainly logical appeals to prove his point, but he also uses ethical and emotional appeals to keep the reader passionate about the idea of civil disobedience. Evidence of Thoreau using logical appeal to convince his readers to stand for what they believe is right is when he states “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing.” In this statement, Thoreau is using the logical argument that many politicians and people agree that slavery is a horrible thing that should not be tolerated. …show more content…

Martin Luther King, Jr. used this same writing strategy to argue for people to peacefully protest against the civil injustices that are happening in Birmingham. “There can be no denying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its 2 ugly records of brutality are widely known. Negroes have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city

Open Document