Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Direct democracy v representative democracy
Feudalism on government
Representative democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Direct democracy v representative democracy
Would you rather live in a place with a representative democracy or medieval European feudalism as the government? According to the dictionary a democracy is “a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state”.In a representative democracy the people elect other people to vote for them in the government. According to the World history social studies textbook, feudalism is “a strict social system in which land owner’s grant people land or other rewards in exchange for military service or labor”. In medieval Europe the levels of feudalism are king, lords, knights, peasants and serfs. A representative democracy is a better form of government than that of medieval European feudalism because the medieval system …show more content…
This means that all of the power and decisions were resting on the king. In a representative democracy there is not a single ruler, and the people have power as well as the rulers. This is better than one single ruler because the people know what’s going on and help decide if certain laws are passed. In medieval Europe most of the people were bound or tied to the land. These people were called serfs. Serfs could not leave the land unless they got permission from the lord. In a representative democracy the people are not bound to the land, so the can move in and out of the country as they wish. It is better to be able to move in and out of the country than to be tied to it because in in the case of attack the people can move in and out of the country. However if the people are bound to the land in the case of attack then they can’t leave the land unless the ruler tells them other wise. Even though serfs were not technically slaves, meaning that they couldn’t be sold like objects, they had a lot in common with slaves. While the serfs could not be sold, they were not free. Serfs were forced to work on the land, like slaves, except serfs worked in exchange for protection. A representative democracy would not have serfs because in today’s society people look down on the idea of
The notion of representative government distinguishes from the notion of representative democracy. McHugh J in Theophanous said that representative democracy describes a society where an equality of rights is existed. In McGinty, it also pointed that the notion of representative democracy requires the people to have an ‘equal electorate’.
Faculty Senate at Truman State University is one small peg in the tradition and history that is representative government and democracy. The term ‘democracy’ is a Greek term that means rule of the people . The earliest democracy and representative government began in Greece, Athens specifically. When representatives were chosen they were selected from wealthy, white males. Usually the men who were chosen were the richest of the possible selection .
Before that can be established, I think a definition of democracy should be stated so that it may be called upon later in this essay. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, democracy is stated as "the principle of social equality and respect for the individual within a community" .
In the Middle Ages, three distinctive kinds of peasants existed: the serfs, slaves and the freemen. However, the majority of the peasant society consisted of the serfs (Gilberts para. 1). Serfs made up only half of the population for peasants in the 14th century, but during the mid-11th century, an astounding ninety percent of peasants, in distinct areas, were attributed to serfs. A serf was under the command of his lord and had to abide by his rules (Singman 8). He then contained absolutely no political rights (Gilberts para. 2). Alike the serfs, slaves were permitted to be sold and purchased, but, in fact, buyers of serfs did not have full ownership over them (Singman 8). If a serf happened to flee and stay hidden and unrestricted for a total of one year, he could then declare himself a freeman (Gilberts para. 2). Freemen were, indeed, permitted to roam around at liberty and own tiny pieces of land (Gilberts para. 1).
All throughout history and even in modern day countries have been structured by a social class system, however sometimes terrible disasters can set off this social balance. The Black Death was an appalling pandemic that swept through Europe killing thousands of medieval Europeans. Feudalism was a social system based on each level giving and getting products and services to keep the medieval society and it’s people alive. All classes during the Black Plague were affected, noble or serf, this caused a monumental power shift and the social classes never to be the same again. With feudalism’s tight social structure, the Black Death in the late 1300s demolished the population and feudal ties in medieval Europe.
Manorialism and Feudalism were weakened by the rise of merchant guilds, plague epidemics, and nationalism. The rise of merchant guilds facilitated long distance trade during the medieval period [1301 - 1500], and lasted into the 18th century. Guilds were social, political and economic organizations in medieval towns. They cared for social and economic welfare of members. Guilds assisted in the rise of new middle class. They enjoyed a trade monopoly in towns, allowed members to earn a living wage. Guilds bypassed or contravened feudalism and manorialism when they purchased self government charters for towns from nobles or started new towns.
Oligarchy is valued above a democracy although they are both ruled by the appetite of the soul. Those within an oligarchy pursue necessary appetites whereas democratic individuals pursue unnecessary appetites. Rulers are present...
promote their self-interests, democracy wouldn’t be a great idea because he wrote that “All mankind is in a perpetual and restless desire for power which can only stop in death,” so giving power to the individual would be creating a dangerous situation which would start a “war of every man against every man, “and life will be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Despite all this, Thomas Hobbes still believed a diverse group of representatives that can present the problems of the common person to king, so prevent them from being cruel and unfair but the monarch has the final
...hat are the true and absolute representative of a people, to instruct men in the nature of that office, and to take heed how they admit of any other general representation upon any occasion whatsoever, if they mean to discharge the trust committed to them” (Hobbes 119-120). What Hobbes, in too many words, has said here is if you have a monarchy, representative government is unnecessary. Near the end of the quote, Hobbes is saying that unless the people who you chose to be your representatives are pure good, or saints, you should not trust them with your power. That is why a monarchy is better, according to Hobbes. One person makes the correct judgment and the people do not suffer. If a corrupt assembly in a democracy were to make a decision then the aristocracy would gain while everyone else would suffer. In this case, the aristocracy usually makes up the assembly.
One of the contemporary definitions of democracy today is as follows: “Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives; Rule by the majority” (“Democracy” Def.1,4). Democracy, as a form of government, was a radical idea when it manifested; many governments in the early history of the world were totalitarian or tyrannical in nature, due to overarching beliefs that the strong ruled over the weak.
The feudal system was a political, military, and economic system based on the holding of land. The system was developed since the whole entire basis of rule from all the civilizations before the Middle Ages was lost. Early Europe was in desperate need of such a system since they were constantly being raided by the Vikings and other outsiders.
More importantly, what is a democracy exactly? Some would define it as a form of government where the people rule, others as where the poor rule, and I would say it is where everyone contributes in how the government is ran but do not control the final decisions made. In Aristotle 's "Democracy and Oligarchy", he discusses the different kinds of democracies that exist and how equality plays a huge role in defining it. Without equality, or even limiting it, it can change a democracy into an oligarchy. He goes into detail about each kind there is and further analyzes how regardless of having similar elements, they are each unique in their own way.
In the end, democracy is the best form of government. It gives people a say in who should rule, it allows the best decisions to be made, and laws that are fair and just according to the majority of that societies’ needs. This can provide a very good and peaceful country, and that’s why democracy is a better form of government than oligarchy, dictatorship, communism, or monarchy. Government is needed to control and bring peace to a society, which other forms of government cannot do to the best of their ability due to their structure. In conclusion, democracy is the best form of government for the people.
Democracy is more beneficial for people than any other form of government. What Weaknesses are Inherent within the Democratic Government System? Ask yourself why democracy is so rare upon
Although scholars dispute its roots, Feudalism was mostly seen in Frankish lands around the 9th and 10th century. ("Feudalism: History of Feudalism in Europe." Infoplease.) The system was first introduced as a means of protection for the king. However, as time grew the opportunity to use it as means of exchange for services between the king and vassal was found. Instead of just forcing people into the king’s army the idea of giving fiefs to those who would pledge their life to service the king was decided on. Likewise, vassal, or the knights saw the advantages they had that could be used to their advantage.