Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of renaissance
The strength of realism
Exploration of individualism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of renaissance
The characteristics that delineate what Renaissance Art is considered to be include individualism, perspective, realism, and the appreciation of the classics. These are a culmination of the standards for the creation of Renaissance Art. These characteristics are what made Renaissance Art because they stemmed from an attempt to recreate the natural world's appearance with rationale and science (Stockstad 306). Michelangelo's David portrays the human body with realism but also with the self-assurance and idealization of the human body as personified in Renaissance pride (Sherman, Salisbury 311). The creation of linear perspective appeared and paintings were transformed from two-dimensional to all but three-dimensional in appearance. Sculptors …show more content…
made their contribution to the arts by attempting to accurately portray the human body, even portraying the human body nude in secular art which hadn't made an appearance since classical antiquity (Stockstad 306).
Michelangelo's David was the most sizable nude created in its day since antiquity (Sherman, Salisbury 311). Architects renewed features of classical architecture which involved classical orders, elaborate motifs from ruined Roman temples, and borrowed designs (Stockstad 306). The Gothic style was eschewed from favor and was replaced with a need to reinvent the resplendence of the classical Greek and Roman architecture (Sherman, Salisbury 309).
Raphael's School of Athens portrays the characteristic of individualism through the persons that are gathered in the painting (Euclid, Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle). Great philosophers are seen throughout having what one can only image to be profound conversations of existentialism. Individualism held the compelling belief that individuals had the cognition to choose right and wrong and that they had the capacity to act on these choices (Sherman, Salisbury 293). The philosophers being chosen to be the subject of the painting expresses the best of society whose choices followed the emphasis and celebration of humans and their achievements
…show more content…
(Sherman, Salisbury 293). The painting also portrays an appreciation of the classics through the architecture of the room where the philosophers are gathered. In the construction of the building there is a balance and symmetry to the room, the opening arch suggests the building to be dome shaped; this arch and the following arches could be a representation of proper ratios referencing Alberti's theorem that the human body should influence buildings in their supports and openings (Sherman, Salisbury 309, 310). Additionally, linear perspective can be seen through the multiple layers of people tiered in the painting as well as through the hall of the building extending back to an exit. From a fixed vantage point, everything in the painting would appear to recede into the distance at the same rate (Stockstad 328). The advantage of this perspective makes the pictorial space appear to be an extension of real space which creates a very compelling sense of depth (Stockstad 328). The centralized focal point in the middle of the painting is is the large archway and the smaller arches following it creating a sense of depth that the eye follows back. The way the people in the painting are configured also gives a sense of depth from how they are grouped on the lower level up through the levels of the stairs and then on the main platform, but also narrow the viewer's eye through the center of the painting. Paintings that are considered to be from the Renaissance body of work reflect several distinctive characteristics; oil paints being used and preferred, the amount of detail that was captured using oil paints, focusing on making portraits realistic and defined with breath-taking detail, and the prominent use of linear perspective to create depth and equal ratios. The technique of using oil paints on canvas emerged as a prominent medium in the field. Previously the most stylish medium for painters was tempera, a kind of watercolor (Sherman, Salisbury 281). Oil paint became preferred over tempera because light couldn't penetrate the lower layers of color and reflect back which resulted in the paintings finish being matte as well as drying almost on contact (Stockstad 308). Paintings done in oil allowed the painter to create more vivid details (Salisbury, Sherman 281). Oil paint doesn't dry as quickly as tempera and changes can be made while the paint is still wet; with oil paint building the layers to be reflected back could create the appearance of an internal luminosity that was absent from tempera paintings (Stockstad 308). They endeavored to perfect portraiture as well, Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa being arguably the most celebrated portrait which inspired other artists portraits later on (Sherman, Salisbury 312, 314). However, what is deemed to the the best creation was linear perspective which allowed them to enhance realism because they could mimic the illusion of three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional surface (Sherman, Salisbury 312). While there is some speculation on to whom the mantle of creator should be bestowed, the Florentines are responsible for perfecting the innovation (Sherman, Salisbury 312). An exceptional example of a classic Renaissance painting is Jan van Eyck's Giovanni Arnolfini and His Bride, 1434 (Sherman, Salisbury 281 fig. 9.9). This painting captures astonishing realism. The painting depicts a portrait of a husband and his bride, but also the viewer can also see the witnesses to the marriage reflected in the mirror on the wall in the background (Sherman, Salisbury 281). The attention to detail the artist was able to convey is also seen in the finery of the clothes, the folds of fabric flowing in the woman's dress and piling on the floor. Even though the husband's clothes are dark, the detail on the sleeves and hem are quite vivid with definition. The dog in the photo has individual strands of fur that can be seen. While using this new medium van Eyck didn't completely abandon tradition, but also preserved much of the Middle Ages ideals; this painting is filled with symbolism to both reveal and explain the world (Sherman, Salisbury 281). Jan van Eyck was the forerunner in forming the use of oil paints as the pictorial voice of the Renaissance while still holding true to personal ideals that created a wonderful unification of old and new in this work. Another fundamental example of a Renaissance painting is Masaccio, Trinity with the Virgin, St, John the Evangelist, and Donors, 1425 (Sherman, Salisbury fig.
10.11). This fresco uses linear perspective to create the appearance of three-dimensional space (Sherman, Salisbury 312). The Trinity fresco's intention was to create the semblance of a stone funerary monument and altar table set in a deep framed niche in the wall (Stockstad 327). There is a tiered effect drawing the eye up towards the center of the painting. The people on the outside left and right are facing inward and the viewer's eye follows their viewpoint which brings the viewers attention further into the painting and the main focal point. The arch brings in the viewer's eye inward as well, creating a frame in itself. An artist named Brunelleschi calculated the mathematical ratios by which things seemed to get smaller as they recede from view which led him to know how large to paint each thing in his grid to attain a realistic appearance of receding space (Sherman, Salisbury 312). Masaccio knew of Brunelleschi's perspective experiments and architectural style which is illustrated in this painting (Stockstad 327). Stylistic innovations take a period of time to be amply recognized and Masaccio's gift for the portrayal of weight, volume, and consistent lighting, and spatial integration were best comprehended by later generations of painters (Stockstad
331). The characteristics that define Renaissance Art are found throughout the artwork of the period whether it be in architecture, painting, or sculpture. The Renaissance was the return to the sources of knowledge and standards of beauty that had created the great civilizations of classical Greece and Rome (Sherman, Salisbury, 292). Each were touched by the influences of individualism, realism, perspective, and appreciation of the classics. Each characteristic built on the splendor the artist wanted to portray.
Which is why there was a focus on paintings to look more naturalistic, just as Greek and Rome did with statues of human figures (being accurate by giving a variance to posture and giving the proper portion). The Statue of Diadoumenos (Metmuseum.org) is an example of naturalism and if compared with the painting of Adam and Eve from artist Albrecht Dürer (metmusem.org), who found interest in “the idea that the perfect human form corresponded to a system of proportion and measurements.” Renaissance humanism began to break from the mold of being reliant on a religious figure or text; they believed that everything could be solved without religion and through nature. It was reflective of Greek thought in literature from prominent figures such as Socrates and
The subject of The School of Athens is humanistic in and of itself. The Textbook Defines humanism in the glossary as “A philosophy emphasizing the worth of the individual, the rational abilities of humankind, and the human potential for good. During the Italian Renaissance, humanism was part of a movement that encouraged study of the classical cultures of Greece and Rome.” In this fresco, Raphael represents the worth and achievements of individuals, as well as the greatness of classical culture. The School of Athen...
Though the Renaissance era included all of Europe, Italy was the cradle of the movement. The cities of Florence, Rome and Venice were of great importance to this period. Major artists created art mainly in these three. As the center of Italy, Rome held the residence of the Pope and many other important factors. Throughout history, the Roman Catholic Church was very insistent on promoting their ideas. During this time, they used artists and their creativity to promote the Bible and other aspects of their beliefs. Artists were paid, or commissioned by patrons (often the Pope) to create art they wanted. One of the most ambitious patrons was Pope Julius II, who realized the impact visual images had on people’s ideas (Kleiner, 599). Pope Julius II was called the warring Pope, because he often went and involved himself in wars. He also held very humanistic ideas. Because of this, Michelangelo’s relationship to Pope Julius II was very different from his relationship with Pope Leo X, who succeeded Julius II. Julius, because of his adaptions to humanistic thoughts, he let Michelangelo express himself to the fullest, even when forcing him to paint the Sistine Chapel. Leo X, however, was very critical of everything Michelangelo set out upon. This resulted a strained relationship, and eventually abandonment of projects that were supposed to be completed. It is clear that Pope Julius II had a liking for Michelangelo, while the Medici’s looked on him as a type of lowly artist subject to their will.
The early Renaissance art in Florence focused on an elaborate, Gothic style of painting; very formal and traditional, yet there was always something that seemed to be lacking. Perspective and depth were two very important qualities in painting, yet up until the time of young Masaccio, (born Tommaso Guidi), paintings were beautiful, but seemed to just be art that hung on the wall. In Masaccio’s work, “rather than recede in space, the figures seem to come forward” (Cole 120). He may not have known it at the time, but his style of painting would influence many painters well after his death; Donatello, Michelangelo, and so on. Masaccio may have only painted for a total of 8 years, but during those 8 years he revolutionized not only the time of the Renaissance, but also the way painting could be created by the artist, and seen by its viewers. Through the use of linear perspective and astronomical instruments, he was able to create amazing works that defied the limits of the human eye, and allowed a painting to possess realistic depth. Through his skills, Masaccio was able to move away from the Gothic and elaborate style of the time, and his paintings reflect the first use of perspective in order to create a sense of a realistic, three dimensional world.
Imagine pondering into a reconstruction of reality through only the visual sense. Without tasting, smelling, touching, or hearing, it may be hard to find oneself in an alternate universe through a piece of art work, which was the artist’s intended purpose. The eyes serve a much higher purpose than to view an object, the absorptions of electromagnetic waves allows for one to endeavor on a journey and enter a world of no limitation. During the 15th century, specifically the Early Renaissance, Flemish altarpieces swept Europe with their strong attention to details. Works of altarpieces were able to encompass significant details that the audience may typically only pay a cursory glance. The size of altarpieces was its most obvious feat but also its most important. Artists, such as Jan van Eyck, Melchior Broederlam, and Robert Campin, contributed to the vast growth of the Early Renaissance by enhancing visual effects with the use of pious symbols. Jan van Eyck embodied the “rebirth” later labeled as the Renaissance by employing his method of oils at such a level that he was once credited for being the inventor of oil painting. Although van Eyck, Broederlam, and Campin each contributed to the rise of the Early Renaissance, van Eyck’s altarpiece Adoration of the Mystic Lamb epitomized the artworks produced during this time period by vividly incorporating symbols to reconstruct the teachings of Christianity.
For my analytical essay I've chosen the Renaissance art movement. I choose this movement because it played such a monumental part in European history. Basically, the Renaissance, also known as the rebirth, was a cultural movement that started an artistic transformation and started the scientific revolution. This time period also links the transition from the end of the Middle Ages to the beginning of the Modern Age. The Renaissance started in Italy in the 14th century and spread to northern Europe by the 16th century.
During my second time visiting the museum, I looked at paintings from the 15th and 19th centuries. Two of the art works that I choose is “The Story of Joseph” from the Renaissance period and “The Marketplace” from the modern art period. Both of these paintings were from different time periods but they were also very similar in content and style.
Masaccio’s famous religious painting, “The Holy Trinity”, is known for the engagement of linear perspective to create an image that goes beyond just paint on canvas, (or should I say wall?) by creating the illusion of depth. This painting addresses many religious concepts by setting up different levels and layers in the constructed space. The characters depicted are made up of four groups of human figures, which include the Trinity (God the father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit), the Virgin Mary and Saint John, a pair of donors, and a skeleton on a tomb at the bottom of the picture. There is an apparent point of separation, which is made clear due to each group being on separate levels. Their difference in power is fundamental feature in explaining the relationship that is being portrayed between mankind and divinity in this painting. Because of Masaccio’s use and manipulation of perspective and a vanishing point – a new line of finite and infinity is crossed because visual manifestations of a hierarchical division between eternal life above, death below and the living in between are expressed.
The night Michelangelo Buonarroti was born, “Mercury and Venus were in the house of Jove,” says Vasari. This means that, according to a lucky star, Michelangelo could be expected to produce extraordinary works of both art and intellect. How true this turned out to be! Whether it was fate or coincidence, few haven’t heard of this world renowned and avant-garde talent. From painting to architecture and sculpture, it seems like there is nothing Michelangelo couldn’t master. Michelangelo is said to have considered himself a sculptor, but why was it then that he produced his sculpture with such a unique and striking depiction of the human body? Why did Michelangelo create such masculine forms, and was it self expression that provoked this intense artistry? There are many factors that can influence an artists creative process, but with Michelangelo the most prominent were most likely his religion, society, travels, and self perception.
The renaissance period relished the human body and the talents of a person: humanism, a view where humans are the main importance, inspired many renaissance artists. The word renaissance means “rebirth”, for much of its works, such as art were based off of the works of the past. The Greeks and the Romans cherished the human body and intellect: almost all of the work from that time period focused on the ideal human body and the intellectual ability of man. Great artists and sculptors from Greece and Rome created perfect human bodies, while architects, great thinkers and mathematicians, developed ways to build structures, such as arches, in both ascetically and mathematically pleasing manners. Humans of the renaissance revitalized idealism and humanism; however, they diverged from the “middle ages”, where most art focused on non-human subjects, for the people depicted were mostly unrealistic, without perspective or any dimensions.
The renaissance art was very different from the medieval art since the renaissance art brought back the human interest of art. I have always found to be surprising that some of the most famous artwork is of naked humans. I also find to be strange as well. Since there are so many things paint or to make sculptures about, this makes me wonders why would artist pick humans and especially naked humans? Sure humans are an interesting thing to make or paint about, however, why not do something of a kingdom, a war, a battle, and even an animal. There are so many things that artist can make, but why to make the focus of the renaissance art of naked humans. However, many tourists around the world will visit these famous these masterpieces work when they are visiting the countries they were created. For instance, the statue of David, which is located in Florence, Italy, was created during the renaissance and it was one of Michelangelo finest work. I have had the pleasure of being able to see the fascinating sculpture in person. At first, I thought it was no big deal. However, when I actually saw for the first time in person my reaction was just. “Wow… I never see anything like. It was incredible”. I also asked myself, “How did he do that? What gave him the inspiration to create such a sculpture? How has it stayed up this long?” I was impressed and usually, I am not impressed by art. It was just
The Renaissance time period started in the late 14th century and it lasted all through the 16th century. It all started in the late Middle ages throughout Italy (http://fashionhistory.net) taking at least one-hundred years before it reached the Northern Alps. This was also the period where the word “European” was put in use and understood by other places, and the word “Renascrere” originated from the Italian word “Renascrere” and it meant to be re-born. The word Renascrere fitted perfectly to this age due to the fact that many had intellectual pursuits and creative energy was re-born (www.richeast.org). The Renaissance would be best known for its artistic aspect and famous polymaths as Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo given the term “Renaissance men.” It was an effective cultural and development of perspective in painting movement spreading to the rest of Europe and the advancements in science. (www.richeast.org)
The Italian Renaissance and the Baroque era are two major periods in art history, some of the types of art in those periods were painting, sculpting, and architecture. During these periods, many artist gained enormous fame from creating wonderful pieces of work that represented their beliefs and artistic thinking. This essay will analyze and evaluate two pieces from those major art periods. Rembrandt 's painting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp and the sculpture David, by Michelangelo. These two masterpieces shed light of their significance in art history. David represents the Italian Renaissance for it being a strong symbol of the new republic, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp depicts the focus on human progression.
Art is a creative way of expressing/applying skill and imagination; All throughout the years, many have expressed their ideas through the many branches of this creativity. Medieval art covered a vast scope of time and place; over 1000 years of art in Europe, and at times, the Middles East and North Africa. Medieval art included major art movements and artists ranked humans in order of social importance based on religious ideology. Initially, early Medieval Art was restricted to the production of Pietistic painting in churches. Artwork, at the time, mainly consisted of architecture, precious metals, oil portraits, ivory/wood carvings, pottery, and more. In addition, there were many types of medieval art that spanned across this 1000 year period. Anglo Saxon Art, Byzantine Art, Carolingian Art, Gothic Art, early Christian Art, and many others were all types of art that proposed during this era. Medieval artwork demonstrated hierarchy by drawing humans sized according to social status rather than true proportions. They considered nature and landscapes trivial, as people of the time
Increasingly, man was accepted as an autonomous individual and emphasized as his own measure, resulting in a loss of true meaning. The “Mona Lisa,” “Pieta,” and “Arnolfini Wedding,” are beautiful masterpieces which not only exemplify esteemed Renaissance art, but also boldly display the convictions of their artists. While Leonardo da Vinci and Jan van Eyck realized the tenants of the gospel and understood the flaws of humanism, Michelangelo adhered to the commonly accepted beliefs of relativism. Most of his contemporaries valued the human intellect, underemphasized their powerful God, and shared Michelangelo’s position. Unsurprisingly, the ideals of humanism that emerged in the Renaissance have not died off, but set the stage for the morals of humanism observed