Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religion in the development of a society
The role of religion in the development of a society
The role of religion in the development of a society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religion in the development of a society
There is no denying that knowledge is disputed all the time in our world. Some of the most hotly debated types of knowledge, however, are those that can be considered hypothetical or more abstract. This ties directly into the statement, “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” In order to explore the truthfulness of this statement in this essay, I will focus on the two Areas of Knowledge of Religion and the Natural Sciences by proposing the question, “To what extent are theoretical solutions and ideas useful in our world?” One general reason that all knowledge can be considered useful is because of the cognitive effects and benefits. Regardless of what is being taught, some people enjoy learning. This …show more content…
Regardless, this theoretical knowledge system has measurable effects on our world. A large part of religion is the community that surrounds it. According to a study titled “Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction” which was published in an issue of the American Sociological Review, religion makes a person happy because of its social in addition to its spiritual aspects. This study shows that not only can a theoretical knowledge system have emotional effects on a person, but it can also have profound effects such as creating entire communities. This shows usefulness on a social level as well as a cognitive one. Another way that religion has an impact on our society is through charitable acts. Religion, to some, is synonymous with charity. In fact, many of the organizations on the Forbes list of top 50 largest charities are religious, including the YMCA, St. Jude’s, Catholic Charities USA, Campus Crusade for Christ, Catholic Medical Mission Board, as well as several others. This shows that these hypothetical knowledge systems can change people’s lives, not only by following them but because also by charitable donations due to religious …show more content…
While the value of these ideas is not necessarily equal to the effects, it is often determined by them. Regardless, religion and the natural sciences are prime examples of hypothetical ideas that not only have these effects on our world but are arguably useful in some sense and not in others. Religious knowledge can be considered useful and valuable because of the sense of community it creates, however, it can also be the catalyst for wars and death. Likewise, fields within the natural sciences such as String Theory have uses such as uniting Quantum physics mechanics and Einstein’s theory of relativity and potential use in the future, however, could turn out to be a large waste of time and money. While a concrete answer on whether or not practicality determines an idea’s value can never objectively be reached, it is an interesting thought that will be considered for years to come, and may or may not be
Stanley Kramer's film, Inherit the Wind, examines a trial based on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee. Often referred to as "The Trial of the Century" (Scopes Trial Web Page), the Scopes trial illuminated the controversy between the Christian theory of creation and the more scientific theory of evolution. John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for illegally teaching evolutionism to his class. "The meaning of the trial emerged because it was seen as a conflict of social and intellectual values" (Scopes Trial Web Page). Kramer's film dramatizes this conflict between the Christian believers and the evolutionists in "Hillsboro, heavenly Hillsboro, the buckle on the Bible belt" (Inherit the Wind). Prosecutor Matthew Brady represents the values of fundamental Christianity while defense attorney Henry Drummond is the voice of reason and science. Although the two men have been good friends and partners in the past, the case in Hillsboro illuminates the difference in their values. Through the scene on the porch with Matthew Brady and Henry Drummond, director Stanley Kramer illustrates the incessant tug-of-war between religion and science. More specifically, camera angle and Drummond's metaphor of the "Golden Dancer" help deliver Kramer's belief in evolutionism.
Religions usually involved huge investments for individuals and societies. The author wonders what benefits religion could bring and the “functions” of
Ross, H. (1997c). The Shell Game of Evolution and Creation. [Online]. Available: http://www.reasons.org/resources/papers/shellgame.html. [Oct. 1997].
As said by Yale professor of psychology and cognitive science, "Religion and science will always clash." Science and religion are both avenues to explain how life came into existence. However, science uses evidence collected by people to explain the phenomenon while religion is usually based off a belief in a greater power which is responsible for the creation of life. The characters Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth in Nathaniel Hawthorne 's novel, The Scarlet Letter, represent religion and science, respectively, compared to the real world debate between science and religion. Roger Chillingworth is a physician who is associated with science. (ch. 9; page 107) "...made [Roger Chillingworth] extensively acquainted with the medical science of the day... Skillful men, of the medical and chirurgical profession, were of rare occurrence in the colony...They seldom... partook of the religious zeal that brought other emigrants across the Atlantic." The people of the Puritan community traveled across the Atlantic for religious reasons, and because men affiliated with medical science did not tend to practice religion, they rarely inhabited this community. Chillingworth, falling under the category of "skillful men of the medical and chirurgical profession," would not be expected to reside in this community. The narrator through emphasizes this with his rhetorical questioning, "Why, with such a rank in the learned world, had he come hither? What could he, whose sphere was in great cities, be seeking in the wilderness?" These questions demonstrate that it was so strange for Chillingworth to appear in this community because of his association with science. Perhaps, the phrase "with such rank in the learned world" could yield the narra...
Gollin, Gillian L. “Theories of the Good Society: Four Views on Religion and Social Change”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9.1(1970): 1-16
Christian Science is an idealistic and most radical form of transcendental religiosity. The study of Christian Science teaches a feeling of understanding of God's goodness and the differences between good and evil, life and death. The purpose of this paper is to address how the study of Christian Science helps us better understand the impact of globalization in America, as well as the impact of American on globalization. This paper is important because globalization features a dominant worldview. All throughout the world people believe, study and teach different types of religious movements that impact others. People need to better understand how certain religions modify, conflict with, and impact the world. First, it will discuss the life and work of the founder, Mary Baker Eddy. Secondly, it will examine the primary rituals and religious services of the Christian Science movement. Then, it will outline the precursors and history of the religion. In the conclusion, a response will be offered to the question of how Christian Science helps us better understand the impact of globalization on America and of America on globalization.
At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...
Schumaker, John F. “Can Religion Make You Happy?” Free Inquiry Summer 1998: 28+. Student Resources in Context. Web. 19 June 2015.
In the past centuries scientific innovations have occupied people’s mind. People have been looking for answers about their existence with the help of science and the scientific method. But nothing has changed with people’s culture or behavior. However, something happened two thousand years ago that influenced and changed how some people perceive the world and self existence. It was the beginning of Christianity.
Knowledge is rarely considered permanent, because it is constantly changing and adapting as time passes and new discoveries are made. This title roughly translates into the question: to what extent is knowledge provisional? In other words, to what extent does knowledge exist for the present, possibly to be changed in the future? At first glance, one’s mind would immediately stray to the natural sciences, and how theories are constantly being challenged, disproven, and discarded. Because of this, one might be under the impression that knowledge is always provisional because there is always room for improvement; however, there are some cases in which this is not true. There are plenty of ideas and theories that have withstood the test of time, but on the other end of the spectrum there are many that have not. This essay will evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional in the areas of the human sciences and history.
Faith may be a strong basis for obtaining knowledge in religion. Believers perceive a lot of the teachings and practices in a religion as pieces of knowledge due to the fact that they have faith in that religion. In Islam, it is considered wrong to eat pork. Because a Muslim has faith in Islam, their religion, they might consider it a piece of a knowledge that it is wrong to eat pork. This can be considered a piece of knowledge that originates from the faith in the religion. Hence, one can c...
In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant makes the argument that one must always develop their natural talents in accordance with what he calls the categorical imperative. Although compelling, his argument is lacking in practicality and is not in accordance with a modern understanding of psychology and the human mind.
Discoveries have been made by individuals using the successes and failures of other individuals to shape their own knowledge and improve treatment methods. The differences among individuals with different religious backgrounds can also shape personal knowledge. Conflicts which lean toward a certain faith can tarnish that faith if people are not willing to fully comprehend the situation as well as the actual belief system. In order for shared knowledge to have any impact on personal knowledge, there must first be shared knowledge. People must be willing to share the personal knowledge which they have gained only from their personal experience. Once that knowledge is shared, people must then be willing to accept it, so consequently it can then shape their personal knowledge, which then will help the world continue to progress and
The relationship between science and religion has been debated for many years. With strong personal opinions and beliefs, it is not surprising that no progress has been made in this argument. In my opinion, I feel as though religion and science have to be related in some way. There is no possible way people can separate two things that attempt to prove the same facts. My belief is that a metaphorical bridge has to be formed to connect the two. Personally, I feel as though science can be a compliment to religion, and that the scientific discoveries can and should be used to prove that God exists, not disprove it. If science did this, then the relationship between science and religion could be a friendly one. If that happened, people could stop debating and fighting over the two, allowing priests and scientists to talk and work together peacefully.
There is an extensive literature available concerned with social sciences and religion or be more specific Economics and Religion. With the given context, we will try to analyze the relationship between them whether in terms of correlation, causality and dependency or independency. Moreover, we will discover theoretical and mathematical ground as well along with the philosophical foundations. In this literature review, starting with the meta existence of Economics and Religion proceeding literature provides chronological and holistic framework for the events. It is also noted that literature on religion and economics is divided into two section: qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis.