Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl marx theory of religion
Marx's conflict theory
The relationship between social and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl marx theory of religion
1. Identify what conclusions can be drawn regarding the association between religion and social class, race and gender.
It appears from the datasheets provided, that Protestants are about the same across all classes. It is the largest religion in the US, a slight difference as you go down the socioeconomic ladder the numbers get higher. Catholics are the second largest group with slightly higher numbers in the middle & working class. There are more Atheists than Jews it shows, with an overwhelming majority of Jews are in the upper class. (Data Sheets)
The same data reveals that Black people are almost all Protestants along with a majority of Whites. The majority of Catholic worshipers listed as other, I assume that means anyone who is not
…show more content…
fully Black, or White, no doubt this is due largely to Hispanics and Latinos. Catholic missionaries covered most of the islands and South America for centuries. Those of the Jewish faith are White as well but the numbers confuse me. (Data sheets) When it comes to Gender Women are obviously the more faithful of the two. Those with no religion at all, men almost double the amount of women. (Data sheets) 2. Analyze the relationship between one’s religious preference and one’s social class. Religion according to Durkheim is responsible for social cohesion.
He attributes “Social Solidarity” or “Collective conscience” to religion. He says it gives us our “Skeleton of thought” and affects the way we see our entire world time, space, cause and effect. (Conley 594) Weber gave us his “Iron cage” concept, attributed to Capitalist ideals of the Protestants. If one is a Protestant with a strong work ethic chances are he will be prosperous and be in a higher class. The networking involved in church life also can enhance one’s class. I propose that it is easier for one’s social class to determine their religion; than for their religion to determine their …show more content…
class. There is always an exception like the Hindu prince who became the original Buddha. There are those who are wealthy but take an oath of poverty; they are in a classification all alone. I suppose they would consider those individuals to be a sect. Many sects believe you cannot be rich and get to heaven, Jesus himself spoke of how difficult it is for a rich man to get into the kingdom of God. This has obviously fallen on deaf ears, Mega churches with operating budgets in the millions. (Conley 615) 3. Identify the greatest differences between white people and people of color in regards to religious affiliation. First, 80% of blacks are Protestant, though the whites have a majority protestant base, there is more diversity. It is not a secret that many black churches are in poorer areas and even though Protestant in name it is a different style of worship. Like a “Party with God” atmosphere in many black denominational churches. Personal experience helps me to see the difference, you will not see anyone dosing off in a black church. It is festive and one cannot help but get caught up in it, religious or not. Black churches are also more active in their communities. (Conley 609) 4. With regard to men and women, identify whose religious attachment is stronger and explanations for why this is so in the US. Women have a far greater religious attachment than men. (Data sheets) There is a stronger correlation between women with children and religion. Child rearing seems to play a role, religious women have more children than non-religious, and it appears the deeper the faith the more kids they want. (Conley609) Men are not as involved in church activities, women pray more and attend more services than men do.(Fig. 16.6 Conley) I believe this is higher in the US because of the culture. In many denominations they still adhere to a patriarchal system, many women are not working outside the home. This means also women will take kids to church groups, participate in functions and benefit from the spirit of community a church has to offer. 5. Using sociological theories and concepts develop an explanation for the various patterns presented in the data. The fact that human beings feel the need to make sense of that, which makes no sense, is thought to be the need for religion by some.
For others it is the need to blame an evil entity for the bad things that happen; if you have evil you must have good as well. In modern times with all of our science, explaining many of what seemed miraculous in the past, one would think religion would be less popular. It seems however, religion is now more wide spread than ever before. Marx’s “Conflict Theory” lead him to believe that if workers could see the truth of how they were being dupped, they would rebel and over throw the oppressors. (Conley 590) Weber believed that the writings of Ben Franklin were the basis for the Protestant work ethic, saying it conveyed the “Spirit of Capitalism”. Protestants felt they must give God a good day’s work. Capitalism turned out not to need God, it worked just fine without the evolvement of religion. As he states in his “Iron cage” theory though Capitalism, once unleashed would keep us all trapped in the rat race gaining just to gain. (Conley 593) This is a good place to talk about the relationship between religion and class. The upper class would surely be the ones Marx thought workers would rebel against, since they are the owners of industry. Middle and working classes needed religion to give them something to look forward to in the afterlife. Women and minority groups have another reason altogether for religion in their lives. They too needed
the perk of a heaven but they need more, being
In the 2011 Religious Affiliation in Australia census data, ‘Catholic’ recorded the highest percentage of adherents, at 25.3%.
“About 270,000 religious congregations in the US have combined annual revenue of $80 billion. Slightly more than 50 percent of Americans belong to a religious congregation. In terms of membership, the largest faiths in the US are Catholic (about 25 percent of the population); Baptist (16 percent); Methodist (7 percent); Lutheran (5 percent); Presbyterian (3 percent); Pentecostal (2 percent); and Episcopalian (2 percent). Church membership statistics are notoriously unreliable.”(Hoover’s 2008)
in common. Italian Americans mainly practice the Catholic religion and the African-Americans mainly practice the Christian religion. Even though these are two different religions, they depict generally the same principles. Christians and Catholics have an immense faith in the Father and the Son. Both of these religions are the same.
[10] “Geographic Distribution of Religious Centers in the U.S” Committee on the Study of Religion. Harvard University, Jan. 2002. http://www.plurarlism.org/resources/statistics/distribution.php
A recent survey done by the PEW research center also found that the American Catholics viewed European Catholics as not as conservative as the Americans.
...stants such as; the Jewish and Muslims who had completely different experiences. Unlike Catholics, endured persecution for their faith and disparate Protestants were not later recognized as accepted religions making it difficult and almost impossible to practice their religions publicly.
De Vaus, David, and Ian McAllister. “Gender differences in Religion: A Test of the Structural
Max Weber’s work The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is arguably one of the most important works in all of sociology and social theory, both classical and modern. In the decades since its inception, this work has gone on to influence generations of social scientists with its analysis of the effect of Protestantism on the development of modern industrial capitalism. This work, examining such broad topics as religion, economics, and history, is not only an interesting and insightful look into the history of the development of capitalism, but a major work in laying a foundation for future works of social theory.
Throughout the course of history, man has looked to religion for answers. Curiosity as to how we got here and why we are have driven people to seek out answers to these somewhat unanswerable questions. Over the past few thousand years, several varying religions have been established, some more prominent than others. Many of them share a similar story of a divine creator who has always been and will always be. In the case of Christianity, whether true or not, it has proven to be beneficial to society as a whole. The Bible set the standard for the moral compass that humans live their lives by to this day. The key fundamental problem with religion, although not the fault of religion, is that man has often used it as a gateway to power and prominence. In the case of the 18th century Gallican church, the French were abusing their religious powers, thus creating vast inequality throughout France, which eventually led to a rebellion against the church, and the eventual destruction of the church within France.
More than one out of five people who were raised as Catholics leave their church nine percent go to Protestantism, four percent to the cults, and nine percent don't have any religious interest (Scalon and Greely, 2003). Catholics who convert to Protestantism are more devoted, more moral, less anticlerical, and are more Protestant than those who remain Catholic (Scalon and Greely, 2003). Some data shows that the religious affiliation are unstable (Scalon and Greely, 2003). "Seventy- one percent of Brazilians are Catholic, eleven percent are Protestant... eleven percent have no religious affiliation but believe in God... six percent belong to cults... and less than one percent say that they do not have a religious affiliation and do not believe in God" (Scalon and Greely, 2003). Are these reasons the same for the rest of the
Marx saw religion as a tool for class oppression because of the conflict it provided for societies. According to Marx, “religion is the opium of the people” and “religion promotes stratification because it supports a hierarchy of people in Earth and the subordination of humankind to divine authority.” Marx believes that man makes religion, and not vice versa. He argues that religion is a mere product of man and is for people who have not won himself or has lost himself again. He calls for the banishment of religion stating that religion is just an illusion of happiness and the abolition of it is a demand for real happiness. Religion highlights social conditions and causes people to think and act the way religion teaches instead of having individuals act based on their own agency.
During the European industrialization, theorist Émile Durkheim was the first to analyze religion in terms of societal impact. Durkheim defined religion as a “unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things” (Keirns, N. et al, p. 337, 2012). In terms of society, Durkheim overall believed that religion is about community: It binds people together (social cohesion), promotes behavior consistency (social control), and offers strength for people during life’s tribulations (meaning and purpose) (Keirns, N. et al, p. 337, 2012). He held that the source of religion is the collective mind-set of society and that this cohesive bond of social order resulted from common values in a society (Keirns, N. et al, p. 337, 2012). Additionally, he contended that these values need to be maintained to sustain social stability (Keirns, N. et al, p. 337,
The sociological approach looks at religious belief and practice in relation to the society. Sociologists are interested in two themes, the centrality of religion in society and the diversity of forms it inhabits (Hamilton 1995/2001:1). It regards religion as a social fact subject to empirical observation, which produces empirical evidence (Dillon 2003:7). The sociology of religion is a product of the enlightenment, from which it inherited a tendency to dismiss religion as incompatible with rationality (Dillon 2003:6). This dismissal has had significant impact on the attitude towards religion and it is the basis for the most influential paradigm in the history of the field; secularisation. The secularisation theory claims that religion is or will be on the decrease in society. So profound was its impact that modern sociology often aims to account for the continued presence of religion in society and has generally held a rather negative view of religion as being an unworthy subject of study(Davies 2007:2).
Marx saw religion as an evil that existed in society and that it brought down all the people that believed in that religion. Marx said that, ?It [religion] is the opium of the people,?[1] and in saying this, Marx meant that religion was contagious on society. Once the society had a taste for the religion, they became totally engulfed it in, and then they do not want to get out of that way of live because they see it as a good way to live. Then even if people wanted to get out of the religion it was hard to get out because the whole society had already been infected by the ?opium.?
Society’s stock of social capital can come from multiple sources, including both individual level factors such as, age, level of education, gender, financial and marital status, and country level factors like, country’s wealth, income inequality, governance quality, shared history. However, the contribution of religion is one of the less explored topic among the sources of social capital. It was Tocqueville who first recognised the religious life as an important contributor to civil society and associational life. For him, associational life is essential for well-being of democracy and protection of individual liberty. Religious associational life, though not explicitly political