Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of the effect of poverty
Review of the effect of poverty
Review of the effect of poverty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of the effect of poverty
Crime is sometimes blamed on the family, with poor
parenting, lack of discipline and family breakdown often associated
with youth crime. A recurrent theme in academic research has been to
investigate the relationship between delinquency and a range of family
related factors. Early studies explored child-rearing behaviour,
parental discipline, the criminal histories of parents and family size
and income. Popular theories in the 1950s and 1960s related juvenile
delinquency to material deprivation, broken homes and to the growing
number of ‘latch key’ children who were left unsupervised after school
while their mothers went to work. All of these presaged current
concerns with discipline and the role of single-parent families. What
has emerged from this research is that some family factors are related
to the likelihood of delinquency but that they must be considered in
the context of the socio-economic circumstances of the family and the
others factors such as school and the peer group. The following
factors have emerged as particularly important.
Parental discipline and supervision
Parental discipline has always been seen as a major factor underlying
youth crime and it was found that inconsistent and erratic discipline
are more likely to be associated with delinquency than lax or strict
discipline (West and Farrington 1973, 1977). More recent studies have
focused on the quality of parental supervision, often measured by
whether parents know where their children are when they are not at
home. A Home Office study in 1995, for example, found that supervision
was strongly related to offending with higher numbers of those who
were no...
... middle of paper ...
...ng number of people who are able to work but choose not
to, live in a ‘different world’ from others. They do not obtain good
habits and discipline and their values contaminate ‘the life of entire
neighbourhoods’ (Murray 1996:p123). Men in such communities cannot
support families, leading to high rates of illegitimacy, and seek
alternative, destructive means of proving that they are men. Whole
communities are devastated by crime and young men look up to criminal
role models.
Whether or not the underclass exists, most agree that industrial
restructuring has led to the growth of communities within which the
majority of inhabitants are excluded from work and its associated
benefits, and that these are also characterised by high amounts of
property crime, youth crime and illegal drug use (Davies, Croall &
Tyrer 1999).
However, Peter had left the household in 2001, but still supported the family financially. In the book Criminal Behavior: A Psychological Approach by Curt R. Bartol discusses the parental and family risk factors of single-parent households. In the early studies it was concluded that delinquents are more likely to come from homes where parents were separated or divorced. In recent studies researchers have looked into the correlation of single-parent households, the quality of the parent-child relationship, economic status, emotional support available, and more. In the study of “conflict-ridden vs. conflict-free” it focused on the process rather than structure of family. Children from a single-parent home that are relatively conflict-free are less likely to be a delinquent than children from conflict-ridden “intact” homes. A stable, secure, and mutually supportive family is exceedingly important
A key thinker, Charles Murray argues for the existence of a separate underclass on the basis of three social phenomena; extra marital births, crime and unemployment. The more prevalent these phenomena are, the larger the underclass. He argues that these individuals are of a separate class, having different social norms and what he classes as deviant behaviours (Murray, 1999). Murray’s key point is that the underclass find themselves in their position through their own choices, that those comprising the underclass are demarcated as such through their behaviour. He believes his evidence shows a quickly growing underclass in the US, and an emer...
Patrick F. Fagan in “Disintegration of the family is the real root cause of violent crime” addresses the main causes of violent crime in context of modern day affairs. Fagan’s approach to inform readers of his opinion is a strategic method of integrating examples of his research into his evidence supporting his position. He ensures to acknowledge major opposing theories and he is very well organized in stating his supporting proof. Although Fagan uses his expertise in marriage as a basis for argument, his open mindedness shows a deep understanding of his point that the underlying cause of violent crimes can be accredited to illegitimacy.
Two of the major criminological theories of the twentieth century are Merton’s strain/anomie theory and Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization. Both theories were very important in their time, and still influence theorization today. This paper will discuss both theories and point out similarities and differences.
According to Price & Kunz, (2003) family structure is a major factor in explaining delinquency. The research aimed at finding a link between cohabiting and other family types with delinquency (Price & Kunz, 2003). They made an important finding that adolescents from cohabiting families are at greater odds of engaging in non-violent delinquency compared to those from biological-parent families. The findings contradict the findings of other studies that show that that youth from broken families are likely to engage themselves in delinquent activities. For example, in one longitudinal study by Juby and Farrington, (2003) they found out that children especially boys who were from non-intact families portrayed negative behaviors compared to those that were from intact families (Juby & Farrington, 2001). Moreover, Prince & Kunz, (2003) performed a meta-analysis involving divorce and juvenile delinquency. They also made a finding that children from divorced homes have a high rate of delinquency compared to those from intact homes.
2006. “Disentangling the Risks: Parent Criminal Justice Involvement and Children’s Exposure to Family Risks.” Criminology and Public Policy 5(4).
Thompson, W. E. and Bynum J. E. (2010). Juvenile Delinquency: A sociological Approach Eighth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Juvenile delinquency may evolve around many different factors before it becomes a problem for society to solve. Gender and family structure can be a large and underlining cause of why children enter the criminal justice system. By examining the gender and family makeup, one could better understand how to treat a troubled individual.
It is a sad fact of life that crime is everywhere – in cities, in suburbs, in country towns; committed by the poor, the desperate, the greedy, and, yes, by the rich, too. We must accept that the level of crime in the society is inversely proportional to the vigilance with which we fight it. Policing the streets and chasing criminals is just part of the settlement. The police can only do so much to impede crime. It is up to every individual to make the difference, and there is plenty that you and I can do.
Families serve as one of the strongest socializing forces in a person's life. They help teach children to control unacceptable behavior, to delay gratification, and to respect the rights of others. Conversely, families can also teach children aggressive, antisocial, and violent behavior. In adults' lives, family responsibilities may provide an important stabilizing force. Given these possibilities, family life may directly contribute to the development of delinquent and criminal tendencies. Parental conflict and child abuse correlate with delinquency. Though not all children who grow up in conflictive or violent homes become delinquent, however, being exposed to conflict and violence appears to increase the risk of delinquency. At this point, researchers have not pin pointed what factors exactly push some at-risk youth into delinquency. A child with criminal parents faces a greater likelihood of becoming a delinquent than children with law-abiding parents. However, the influence appears not to be directly related to criminality but possibly to poor supervision.
Experts believe this is because juveniles from poorer backgrounds have lower expectations on what they can accomplish in their lives and are at greater risk of criminal conduct. Despite these studies not all juvenile fire setters come from a poor background. The average age of a juvenile fire setter is approximately eleven years old. The juvenile offender is largely male making up 94 percent of total offenders. Children raised in single parent homes lack adult supervision and guidance due that the mother does not have time to supervise her child or children due that she may be working several jobs for extra income. Parental rejection is strongly pointed as being the most powerful predictor of delinquency. Children lacking a healthy intact family system appear to be at a higher risk of delinquent behavior. A negative family background seems pivotal in factoring juvenile delinquency. Juveniles lacking strong parental discipline, facing marital discord, abuse, neglect, and parents with criminal behavior can contribute to delinquency. Two parent homes today are now in decline and this appears to be the standard moving toward the future. Williams, D. (n.d.) Understanding the Arsonist: From Assessment to Confession (2nd
A finding that emerges very strongly and consistently is that delinquents have very poor relationships with their parents” (Gove 303-304). The teens who commit crimes often lack a parental figure in their lives. These teens are not strictly overseen by their parents, and their parents rarely know what they are up to or what they are doing (Gove 303). “Poor parent-child relationships, lack of parental control, and erratic behavior of parents could be a product of juvenile misbehavior and the juvenile’s hostility towards his or her parents” (Gove 304). Teens that do not have a close relationship with their parents often resort to delinquency as a form of resentment. “The family as an institution plays a critical role in the socialization of children; as a consequence, parents presumably play a critical role in whether their children misbehave” (Gove 315). Parents play the biggest role in a child’s life because the parents have been with the child since birth. Parents shape, mold, and provide the foundation that a teen needs to make hard decisions and to live by a good m...
When a person is directly impacted by a crime, the repercussions and reverberations that it can have on their own life are overwhelming. In many cases, the aftermath of a criminal offense can be more debilitating than the crime itself. The prevailing notion that has existed in society for ages is that locking the offender away is the best way to alleviate the harm caused and achieve justice. On the surface, this seems like an ideal reaction to crime; the wrongdoer is locked away so they are no longer a threat to society, and this is should, in principle, satisfy the victim’s desire for vengeance. In reality, however, this premise neglects so many essential pieces of the puzzle. One of these forgotten pieces, and a very notable one at that,
...ng up in a single-parent home (usually female-headed) is seven times as likely to be a delinquent. The rate of violent crime and burglary is related to the number of single parent households with children aged twelve to twenty. (1)In a new study of 72 adolescent murders and 35 adolescent thieves, researches for Michigan State University demonstrated that the overwhelming majority of teenage criminals live with only one parent. Fully 75 percent of those charged with homicide had parents who were either divorced or had never been married at all.( 5)
There is no one certain theory, regarding juvenile delinquency, that can completely distinguish all the determining factors that makes youth turn to crime; although, the study of all these theories and ideas can bring criminologist one step closer to uncovering the truth about juvenile delinquency. Only the further understanding of juvenile delinquency can help the prevention of future juvenile offenders. This paper will focus on the individual factors of delinquency, as well as the social elements, and provide an explanation of how the combination of the two elements may cause children to engage in criminal activity.