Life in Tudor England was very much dominated by religion. Henry VIII reign was to see the rise of Protestantism and a major change in religious beliefs and practices, it would also cause years of unrest within the kingdom which would continue throughout the reign of his 3 children, all of which would have a major impact on the country.
When Henry VIII made the decision to have his marriage annulled to his wife Catherine of Arrogan, a devoted Catholic and mother to his daughter Mary and also Cousin to the Pope of Rome, he set in motion a series of events that would have a monumental effect on the future of religion in England. The pope refused Henry’s request and this lead to the reformation of the Church of England to which he instilled himself the head of allowing for his divorce. Once the divorce was complete, Henry married Ann Boleyn, who was part of the growing protestant group, who gave birth to Henrys second Daughter Elizabeth. After he had Ann beheaded, he went on to Marry Jane Seymour, who gave him his long awaited heir Edward. Elizabeth and Edward were both brought up as Protestants, whereas Mary was raised as a catholic. In 1539 Henry took it upon himself to abolish the monasteries his intentions were to gain the wealth and “suppress political opposition.” (http://www.bl.uk/learning/timeline/item106122.html)
After the death of Henry VIII in 1947, the young Prince Edward would take the throne, however, being too young to reign he was at the mercy of his advisors, who all had their own personal agendas, Thomas Cranmer “compiled a new and distinctively protestant order of service” this was enforced in 1549 and attempts were being made to “stamp out catholic practices”. Edward was a rather Sickly child and before he ...
... middle of paper ...
...ences between the periods show radical changes to the church from the separation from Rome, to the simplifying of the churches. Roger was born 6 years before Elizabeth, but there upbringings would have been very different, with Roger been raised within the catholic church, and Elizabeth been educated and raised with protestant ways.
Works Cited
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TUDelizabeth1.htm
(http://www.bl.uk/learning/timeline/item106122.html)AA100, Assignment booklet, October 2013,( p28)
John Wolffe, (2008) AA110 Book 1 Tradition and Dissent, Milton Keynes, The Open University, pp. 71-106
http://www.bl.uk/learning/timeline/item106122.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/tudors/elizabeth_i_01.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VI_of_England
https://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/KingsandQueensofEngland/TheTudors/ElizabethI.aspx
Overall, political causes were a constant factor throughout the period, and although socio-economic causes were always present, by the end of the Tudor dynasty they began to decline. Both religion and dynasty both had periods of time when they took precedence in rebellions and were of particular importance. But it is throughout the reigns of both Henry VIII and Elizabeth, when faction became more narrowly focused, that political causes are at their most constant and similar.
...olitical needs of the time, which was the divorce of Henry from Catherine of Aragon in 1533, in order for Cromwell to fulfil his king’s wish; he pragmatically detached the problematic Pope and his Holy Roman Empire from England to resolve the Great Matter by having to (not wanting to) reform the Parliament, consequentially morphing England into a sovereign state. The bureaucratic reformation which is argued by Elton to be a part of the revolution in Tudor government once again boils down to Cromwell’s loyal servitude to the king, addressing the financial problem of Henry’s with a series of solutions which would certainly benefit the King in the long term. The work of Cromwell was not revolutionary as it failed to survive the several changes of monarchy (excluding the work achieving sovereignty) and did occur in a swift manner how revolution realistically would occur.
...glish church and its breakdown whilst exposing the reformation under monarchs Henry VIII and Edward VI as an attack on traditional religion. Seen as a revisionist, Duffy’s work emphasises on the traditional religion and the idea of a relatively slow Reformation imposed from above. Duffy’s book end at 1580, during the reign of Elizabeth I, as he believes that the reformed Anglican Church was sufficiently in place by that date and that the return to Catholicism was unlikely.
The 17th century was a chaotic time period in England. England saw a transition in their nation’s religion during the reign of different monarchs. Before the start of the 17th century, England was under a Roman Catholic monarch with Queen Mary. Mary attempted to turn the Church of England into a Catholic Church and in the process earned the name “Bloody Mary”. She earned this name through her executions of many Protestants in England. However once Mary was unsuccessful in creating a Catholic England and was no longer the monarch, the Church went back to a Protestant Church. With the church now being Protestant, the Catholic minority in England began to become upset with the church and even plotted to make the church Catholic again through violence.
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
Mary Tudor's reign on England was unsuccessful because her goal of returning England to the Roman Catholic church was never completely fulfilled. Mary Tudor's decisions as queen were mostly driven by anger and the want to get revenge. Although Mary Tudor could be very kind and giving to her people at times a fact that is remembered by many is how Queen Mary allowed many brutal executions of people in England to be performed just because of their choice of religion. That can curb people's opinions of her very fast.
The Anglican Church and the English government were closely related to each other; the king not only ruled the country, but was the head of the church as well. Therefore, disobeying the church meant that people also acted against the king[i]. Like governmental organization, the Church of England was based on a hierarchal structure. It favored powerful bishops, ornate services and liturgies, and allowed people to personally observe the religion. During King Charles I’s reign, royal and elite citizens of England largely composed the Church of England[ii]. These close connections between the church and the state allowed for much corruption to take place[iii].
Like her father Elizabeth took England into a different direction. She would be attributed for many advancements in the English kingdom. Under Elizabeth Arts flourished, exploration heightened, literature increased, and foreign trade succeeded. Elizabeth like her grandfather won the hearts of her subjects. Perhaps one of the more outstanding accomplishments in Elizabeth’s reign is peace. Although she was raised Protestant, unlike her brother she did not condemn and punish Catholics. She took a more peaceful approached and tried to bridge a barrier amongst Protestant and Catholics that allowed them to live in peace. Elizabeth may have had many intelligent advisors, but she did not allow herself to be dominated and repressed. Equally intelligent, Elizabeth was able to further support the suffering of her kingdom. She failed to supply proper income to fund her wars, but she was able to sustain the wealth within her own kingdom. This alone made Elizabeth the final Tudor, a successful
Loach, Jennifer. “Mary Tudor And The Re-Catholicisation Of England.” History Today 44.11 (1994): 16. World History Collection. Web. 18 Nov.2013
Over the years, the question of ‘What makes a good monarch?’ has arose. There are certain standards that Kings and Queens are held to and many have fallen short in these departments, one being King Richard III. However, there are a few that have exceeded the expectations, followed the standards, and ruled with dignity and honor. King Edward III and his brother-in-law, King Harold II, are two examples of worthy monarchs. The traits that make them so noble and distinguished are their legitimacy, fairness, leadership, protection of the realm, advances of the realm, and their perspective.
Elizabeth [grew up in complex and sometimes difficult circumstances]. In 1547 Elizabeth’s father, Henry VIII, died. Catherine Parr took care of Elizabeth. She hired tutors for Elizabeth. Fighting between Catherine and her husband, Thomas, made Elizabeth have to go back the Hatfield estate. [Elizabeth’s relationship with Thomas came under scrutiny. Thomas was later tried for marring Elizabeth for power. He was found guilty and later executed].
...ample. Henry VIII was also responsible for the religious reformation in England and changed the religion of England from the Roman Catholic faith to the Protestant Religion, and established the Church of England. If it weren’t for King Henry VIII, England would not have been as wealthy as it was because of the dissolution of the monasteries. The Act of Appeals aided the constitutional development of England, once again, all thanks to Henry VIII.
The traces of the split can be seen nearly five hundred years ago during the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century. During King Henry VIII’s rule, Henry had wanted a divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, to marry Anne Boleyn. When the Pope would refuse to allow a divorce between Catherine and Henry, Henry would decide to start his own church so that he could be in a position of power to proceed with the divorce. This church would become the Church of England. Through this radical break away from the social norm, Henry VIII would be remembered as a man who would go to great lengths to get what he wanted. This break would also signify the beginning of the Protestant Reformation across Europe. This event marks the first time that two groups are seen as a national friend and foe recognition. As Bartlett notes, “By the 1570’s loyal and disloyal ...
After Elizabeth took the throne and became the ruling monarch of England she wanted to relieve the tension between the Protestants and the Catholics. Elizabeth decided on a compromise between the two religions, one that would have characteristics of both, this new religion was called Anglicanism. The factors that caused Elizabeth to make this decision were her personal religious preferences, the views of the Marian Bishops and the opinions given to her by the parliament. However this compromise did have consequences. These include the dissatisfaction from both Protestants and Catholics, The Vestiarian Controversy and the Catholic opposition the settlement.
Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I may have been the English Reformation’s greatest benefactors, all because of self interest. Henry VIII was not originally Protestant, but after the pope denied him of his divorce, Henry VIII took things into his own hands. Due to the power kings had in the Middle Ages, Henry VIII was able to control Parliament and force it to do whatever he wanted. So in 1534, Henry VIII forced Parliament to pass a law he made known as the Act of Supremacy. The Act of Supremacy stated that the king ought to be the head of the Church of England. This law gave the king complete power over the Church of England, instead of the pope. However, the type of church and state relationship did not change. Rather all the Act of Supremacy did was take power from the pope and give it to the king. Surprisingly, the Catholics did not retaliate against this strong change. The pope had always been the head of the church, but now the king had taken his position. This serves as an example of nationalism. The Catholics did not think about how removing the pope could harm their religion in any way. However, instead the people blindly followed Henry VIII because he was the leader of the nation and they assumed he was right. Also, by imposing other laws that punished Protestants, Henry VIII did not give the people much of a choice. Fortunately, for Henry VII, nationalis...