More handpicked essays just for you.
A critique of reggio emilia's approach to educational philosophy
Critique of Reggio Emilia approach
Critique of Reggio Emilia approach
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I would have to say that I identify with the Reggio Emilia approach. I like that the curriculum is unique and dynamic and it allows the children to explore using materials from the environment. The teacher’s role is to partner in the learning process. Observe, and document what the children are doing/ learning. I like this way of learning because it engages the student in the learning process. The children work in small organized groups that are mixed together not by their intelligence. I like that every student works and correlates together as a team. They children ask their own questions, generate and test their own hypothesis. This approach works because it gives each child in the group a chance to use their strengths to share their own
The Australian Curriculum has been a 'long time coming', but its great that it is almost here now. The Australian Curriculum has been designed with some relation to Tyler and Skillbeck's models. It is suspected that theorists such as Piaget were also considered during the development. The Australian Curriculum relates to Piaget's stages of progression, with curriculum being designed for specific levels of maturation and development. With students of this generation, it was incredibly important that an updated, curriculum was to be designed so that it could facilitate the needs of the 21st century learners. This new generation of learners seem to be almost born with basic computer skills, so the ICT program has been completely redeveloped. The curriculum has also expanded to make way for Asian studies which will help students as they move into their careers. The Australian Curriculum has been developed to cover a broad range of topics, concerns and values that will be discussed throughout this paper.
The Australian Curriculum is fluid, ever-changing and highly politicised. There is constant debate surrounding what should, and should not be taught in Australian schools. The Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) Curriculum in particular, has undergone dramatic changes over the last few years. This essay will critically analyse two provocations relating to the HASS 7-10 curriculum, and some of the surrounding issues that HASS teachers contend with on a day to day basis. The first provocation, the purpose of Civics and Citizenship teaching is to teach about democracy, not for democracy, will be examined in relation to opinions regarding left-wing bias in the Civics and Citizenship curriculum, and the idea that the course teaches too much ‘for’
Sometimes raters have a hard time separating grading individuals from assessing how well the program’s curriculum prepares learners. To help faculty at NCPS view the QIPER as a tool for program evaluation, we pointed out patterns in CRs scores. Once faculty started to see patterns in scores themselves, the conversations moved away individual performance on the QIPER and back evaluating how well the curriculum prepares CRs to lead a QI/PS project.
The development of a national curriculum for Australia is not a new endeavour (Marsh, 2010). The ideal is that national curriculum across Australia would mean that students are provided with a quality education that helps to shape the lives of the nations citizens and continue developing the productivity and quality of life within Australia. The Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] have the task of developing and implementing a nationwide curriculum. ACARA (n.d.-c) claims have addressed needs of young Australians while considering that changing ways in learning and challenges will continue to shape students education in the future. A look at what the Australian Curriculum is, its purpose, structure and scope, learning theories and teaching processes and whether the curriculum has the capacity to meet the needs of 21st century learners will show that the initial construction of a national curriculum appears to be successful. However, the effectiveness of the Australian Curriculum will only be able to be evaluated in the future after implementation across the country.
In modern democratic society school curriculum has become a prioritised concern for many citizens. It is a key factor in the shaping of future generations and the development of society. Decades have lapsed and numerous attempts have been made to produce a national curriculum for Australia. In 2008 it was announced that the Rudd government in collaboration with State and Territories would produce a plan to move towards a national curriculum (Brady & Kennedy, 2010). To date this has been realised in the deliverance of the Australian Curriculum v1.2 which will be examined in this paper.
...l. With the current curriculum in place, I think that the Parallel Curriculum would be the most adaptable at this time. It is a model that can be designed, evaluated, and revised. In my current work setting, the students are at various levels. Although, I feel strongly about the themes throughout the Integrated Curriculum Model, I do not think that is a model that could be easily revised/ changed and fit the different levels of my current class. With that being said, it also allows the flexibility to adhere to the varying needs of the students as wells as their interest. I particularly like the identity parallel for my current students. Making relationship is a skill that they relate to particular well. To have opportunities through the year for self-exploration would greatly benefit this group. Making connections helps provide a deeper meaning of the content.
Education is designed to serve many purposes towards the youths of today. It teaches the youth how to be better people and it prepares them for life. Education teaches its pupils knowledge in more that one way, by looking at life in different directions. There is a curriculum that is taught by the teachers and the textbooks, and in addition to the standard schooling there is also a “hidden curriculum.” Gatto and Rose each have their own style of teaching and learning and their articles explain their unique styles. In college, high school, and even previous schooling, lessons are taught that enforce hidden instruction, but the students that succeed are the ones that recognize this and learn from it.
Many of my students are functioning on grade levels ranging from kindergarten to 9th grade, so the material I chose must be chosen wisely. I primarily use three of the types of educational philosophies, but have used all 5 in various ways during my years teaching. Beginning with perennialism, I use my previously learned knowledge from real life experiences to talk with my students about life outside of the classroom. The delivery of my knowledge is to advise students on how to discipline themselves to become productive citizens in the community. Next, idealism is used in my classroom by establishing goals for my students to achieve. Students are given annual goals based on their needs, my instruction, and assessments. Then, realism is implemented by relating curriculum and applying it to real life events. For
Thirdly both approach focus on educators to provide encouragement, warmth, and acceptance. They also provide challenges for creative and complex learning and thinking, helping children to extend their ideas and actions through sensitive, informed, well-judged interventions and support. Te Whᾱriki principles points out “children learn through responsive and reciprocal relationships with people, places and things” (p. 14).
Central Idea: There isn’t such thing as a perfect teaching system out there. However, having the freedom to choose which learning curriculum to use based off of what works best for your child’s learning needs is very important.
Another issue I felt as if it is it is important is hidden curriculum. After reading these two articles one can say that labeling schools can harm a students learning. Not only because this is teaching students to have different mindsets on how they learn but they start seeing how other students learn and compare themselves too them. Making it seem they are at a different learning level than the others. When reading “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, she says that these are more of “hidden curriculum” for students. She observes several different elementary schools that have many students with different kinds of backgrounds. From their economic class, to their social class, to race, to their learning levels on basic
To that end, I have several areas of interest that I predict will inform my personal teaching style. I am interested in practices that are accessible and inclusive. I am interested in how information is transferred between a student and a teacher and how that information reinforces power structures in
According to Glatthorn, Boschee and Whitehead (2006, p.74), a curriculum theory is a set of related educational concepts that affords a systematic and illuminating perspective on curricular phenomena. In a simpler term, a curriculum theory is an academic discipline devoted to examining and shaping educational curricula (Wikipedia, curriculum theory). One that would be a proponent of a structured-oriented curriculum would be concerned primarily with analyzing the components of the curriculum and their interrelationships. They will tend to be descriptive and explanatory in intent whereas, one that is a proponent of a value-oriented curriculum would be concerned primarily with analyzing the values and assumptions of curriculum makers and their
There are many theories that are relevant to classroom teaching today. Marsh (2008, p. 17) states that “each theory is nothing more than a set of reasonable suggestions”. A teacher should look at the information available to them and take what is necessary to achieve a positive learning environment in their classroom. This may mean taking a little part of one theory and combining in with another part of a different theory, there is no singular theory or theorist that encompasses everything that is required in a modern classroom. Some of the most important theories of learning are motivation, constructivism and behaviourism. Teachers choose their teaching style and strategy to complement their students, to arrive at their own personal version of the most effective teacher they can be. Eggen & Kauchak (2010, p. 390) state, a teacher “maximises student learning” and this is what all teachers should strive to achieve. In looking at some of these theories, it can be shown how their ideas can transfer from paper into the busy, challenging classroom of today.
Now that I have seen three different classrooms as part of my practicum observations, I still believe that there are several acceptable approaches and no universally correct teaching methods. However, my thinking has changed because I have seen that everything done ...