More handpicked essays just for you.
Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
Implications of social class on education
Implications of social class on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
Another issue I felt as if it is it is important is hidden curriculum. After reading these two articles one can say that labeling schools can harm a students learning. Not only because this is teaching students to have different mindsets on how they learn but they start seeing how other students learn and compare themselves too them. Making it seem they are at a different learning level than the others. When reading “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, she says that these are more of “hidden curriculum” for students. She observes several different elementary schools that have many students with different kinds of backgrounds. From their economic class, to their social class, to race, to their learning levels on basic
Kozol describes schools that run almost like factories or prisons in grim detail. According to Kozol, US schools are quite quickly becoming functionally segregated. Kozol lists the demographics of a slew of public schools in the state, named after prominent civil rights activists, whose classrooms are upwards of 97% black and Hispanic — in some cases despite being in neighborhoods that are predominantly white. It has been over 50 years since Brown vs. the Board of Education. It is sad to read about the state of things today.
Kozol has compiled a list of schools that are either still segregated, or are re-segregating and the schools do not have the same things as those in suburban, or mainly white neighborhoods. He outlines many inner city schools as mostly African American and Hispanic students. Some schools have less than a quarter of their population come from Caucasian decent, and as few as one student in the demographics. Kozol speaks about unequal d...
The efforts of desegregation have to be back in order and this means that more adults have to admit their children to schools irrespective of the ethnicity. So, what’s stopping them? A Guest Post in Colorado school grades, a coalition of 18 non-profit community organizations, written by Michael Petrilli, an award-winning writer, and president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which talks about pros and cons of choosing a diverse school for children might give us an answer. Focusing on the cons, we have the first one which is the child might end up in a school that has less funding and resources which is true as emphasized in the article Desegregation Since the Coleman Report. The next reason was having to take small risks regarding safety and finally, the third being even if the classes were not separated by race, they would be separated by intellect which was again both of which were discussed in “A Crisis of Authority in Predominantly Black Schools?” I.E the concluding that American education system is directly or indirectly involved in the matters of segregation and playing a huge role in discrimination and education
The Australian Curriculum is fluid, ever-changing and highly politicised. There is constant debate surrounding what should, and should not be taught in Australian schools. The Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) Curriculum in particular, has undergone dramatic changes over the last few years. This essay will critically analyse two provocations relating to the HASS 7-10 curriculum, and some of the surrounding issues that HASS teachers contend with on a day to day basis. The first provocation, the purpose of Civics and Citizenship teaching is to teach about democracy, not for democracy, will be examined in relation to opinions regarding left-wing bias in the Civics and Citizenship curriculum, and the idea that the course teaches too much ‘for’
Poorer schools with more diverse populations have poor educational programs. Teachers methodically drone out outdated curriculum on timetables set by standards set by the state. Students are not engaged or encouraged to be creative thinkers. They are often not even given handouts or physical elements of education to touch or feel or engage them into really connecting to the material being presented by the teacher in front of them. Time is not wasted exploring any of the subjects in a meaningful way. As much of the curriculum is gone through as the teacher can get through given the restriction of having a classroom of students that are not picking it up adequately enough according to standardized tests scores. So time is spent re-droning the material to them and re-testing before the cycle repeats in this classroom and other subject classrooms in these types of school. This education is free. As John Gatto writes about in his book, “Against School”, it seems as if the vast majority of students are being taught be blue collared, low paid but obedient citizens. As she makes her way up to less diverse, more likely private and expensive schools, the education becomes better. Students are engaged by teachers that seem to like to teach. Students are encouraged to be
The development of a national curriculum for Australia is not a new endeavour (Marsh, 2010). The ideal is that national curriculum across Australia would mean that students are provided with a quality education that helps to shape the lives of the nations citizens and continue developing the productivity and quality of life within Australia. The Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] have the task of developing and implementing a nationwide curriculum. ACARA (n.d.-c) claims have addressed needs of young Australians while considering that changing ways in learning and challenges will continue to shape students education in the future. A look at what the Australian Curriculum is, its purpose, structure and scope, learning theories and teaching processes and whether the curriculum has the capacity to meet the needs of 21st century learners will show that the initial construction of a national curriculum appears to be successful. However, the effectiveness of the Australian Curriculum will only be able to be evaluated in the future after implementation across the country.
This situation is similar to the U.S., where people have the chance to enter school depending on their zip code. With the voucher program, now students can choose schools even if it is public, charter, religious without a zip code, even though this idea did not go far, but it was a great reform. Ravitch, Reign of Error, chapter 19, p206-207. Segregation and integration and race and class This issue has been happening for many years and not only in education, but also in many other aspects.
America’s school system and student population remains segregated, by race and class. The inequalities that exist in schools today result from more than just poorly managed schools; they reflect the racial and socioeconomic inequities of society as a whole. Most of the problems with schools boil down to either racism in and outside the school system or financial disparity between wealthy and poor school districts. Because schools receive funding through local property taxes, low-income communities start at an economic disadvantage. Less funding means fewer resources, lower quality instruction and curricula, and little to no community involvement.
The decision of Brown vs. Board affected education nationally in 1954 by dismantling racism in schools. For this reason, segregation did not produce affirmative results for implementing equal opportunity in society. Citizens of the United States should receive a suitable education regardless of an individual’s race or class. Unfortunately, society is continuing separation because of the injustice of race and the location of poverty stricken individuals by not upholding a certain stature. “Compounding and reinforcing this educational inequality is the startling socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation in the United States” (Rist 4). Isolation of African American, Hispanic, and other minorities are affected because of their lack of prosperity, and it continues to influence society negatively by reducing the equality and opportunity to succeed. Race and class are the main issues of concern affecting education’s infrastructure; to change this misfortune, people will have to stand to fight for proper education within the United States and not depend on the government. Education is being affected by the lack of proper parenting skills, scarce economic resources in school systems, and society’s misinterpretation of individual’s environment affecting learning capabilities.
I do see how this is an easy sell for politicians and reformers. This driver is also a recipe for disaster. I think our schools have done an outstanding job of accomplishing their social, economic and democratic goals. Our country is the leading superpower in the world and our quality of life and social mobility is unparalleled. The “Nation at Risk” paper, while helpful in some regards, has produced a negative self-image of American Schools that leads “customers” to seek reform from misunderstanding. We will see negative impacts from these initiatives like school choice in the near
There is an unequal balance in America's public school funding system. Every state and district requires different amounts of federal funding for their schools. Therefore, living in a poverty stricken community compared to a wealthier community, school funds would look a lot different. Wealthier communities typically have a greater pay for teachers, therefore attracting the best teachers. There would be more plentiful materials to help children learn as well due to funding. Less fortunate communities would be somewhat of the opposite. This inequality in the public school system is unfair to the most vulnerable - children.
If you ask most parents they will say the most important thing for their child is to be healthy, safe and get a good education. Most parent believe it is important for their child to get a good education so they can go to college and get a good job so they can have a better life. All children receive education and are required to go to school k-12. It is important for teachers to understand and use theory in their classroom. If teachers understand theory and the theorist it could help bring a better learning atmosphere for schools. Schools though out the United States bring a different learning atmosphere. The United States is faced with the ongoing problem of poverty. Families all over the United States are struggling. A lot of child who grow up in a family struggling with poverty drop out of school to get a job to help their family survive. Poverty is a big problem but so is school safety. Safety in schools is so important and over the last ten years there has been a lot of school shooting and violence. Giving children an education while keeping them safe is important. Teaching school safety continues
Some states want to have separation when it comes to the income of these schools. States argue that high class, wealthy, school districts should have more money than the lower class districts, because of the tax payers wants or because there are better opportunities for students to grow in the wealthier areas. According to the U.S. Department of Education, more than 50 percent of lower end schools are not receiving the amount of money they should get from the state funds (U.S. Department of Education). This is what is preventing school districts in these areas from helping students with their education. The schools are forced to cut back on programs such as extracurricular activities that are suppose to encourage students to be active, or they would have to cut back on supplies where in some cases there are not enough textbooks for each student to have his or her own. The U.S. Department of Education also stated that teachers that are less paid and have less years teaching are often the ones dealing with the students in poverty. (U.S. Department of Education). This only prolongs the problem with children receiving the proper education. If they are taught by teachers who don’t know what they are teaching or those who don’t have enough experience, then the students are not going to learn the correct information or any information at all. While there are some schools
Before talking about what goes on inside the schools, I'd like to mention the district itself. There will be no alternative school choices, bussing, or deliberate desegregation practices. Each school will be remarkably similar to the others in the district so that every child may receive a similar education regardless of the neighborhood they live in. When students are separated to different schools for any reason (academic talent, wealth, interests, race, gender) they fail to interact with different types of people that they will undoubtedly encounter in the "real" adult world. In addition, I feel that is very important for children from the same neighborhood to attend the same school in order to increase a sense of community. Finally, as the Case Study of Boulder Valley points out, school choice takes valuable resources away from teaching and places them in school competition (Howe 144).
For example, in the Conway school district, ninety six percent of teachers are white while point six percent are Latin American and one percent are American Indian. The school is not reaching its capability of reaching all students because of the huge gap in diversity. The board of education does not consider that racial diversity does matter in the classroom. There are several benefits to having a diversity among students such as being able to collaborate with one another. Each mind thinks differently which leads to each students expanding their knowledge on certain topics discussed in the classroom. Maybe issues and scenarios like that do not matter to school boards, but do matter to the