Reflections On The Bicentennial Of The Constitution By Thurgood Marshall Summary

702 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What were the main reasons for the American Civil War

“When contemporary Americans cite “The Constitution,” they invoke a concept that is vastly different from what the framers barely began to construct two centuries ago” (Marshall 611). This quote from Thurgood Marshall conveys his message in “Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution.” Thurgood Marshall is the first Black Supreme Court justice, and he wrote these reflections in 1987. He does not believe that the Founding Fathers’ idea of The Constitution should be highly celebrated, as it no longer exists in that state. His essay is filled with historical context and substance. Using a clever delivery, his message is conveyed emotionally and with logic. The method of organization allows the reader to better absorb …show more content…

Reading his reflections today affords people from our era a great perspective of those events. Logically, if today’s society views people as equal, and that is the right thing to do, then society in the past was wrong to not do that; and The Constitution is partially at fault for their ignorance. Logic was also very relevant in the emotion based arguments too. Many times emotion tramples over logic, but in this case they went hand in hand. For example, the Civil War is surrounded with emotion by many, but similarly to the point before this one, it requires logic. That logic is what affirms to the reader that the Civil War was …show more content…

Marshall generally writes his essay chronologically, excluding his introduction and his conclusion. Since the essay is written this way, the brain can easily follow along, allowing the reader to focus on the main point. This organization also allows for the reader to see the societal and legal changes that happen over time. Marshall also moves from the easy and light topics to the heavy ones as his essay continues. Early on he is talking about the drafting of the Constitution, then he moves into the Civil War. Both of these methods make the essay more impactful for the reader. “Contemporary Americans” have a lot to earn from Thurgood Marshall here. In his eyes The Constitution does not deserve the high-praise that it gets. He uses context, logic, and emotion to convey his message, and his presentation facilitates

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Slavery's Constitution By David Waldstreicher

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    He focuses on the delegates that were sent by each state to the debate and talks about the various compromises that were made. He discusses the compromises that were also made during the debates. He also gives us a sense of the atmosphere of how peaceful the black protesters’ actions were against the document. The book Slavery’s Constitution focuses on the 13 colonies which were the beginnings of the United States. He also states that the reason for certain silences were to keep the peace between the two divisions, which were the Northern and Southern

    Read More

  • Apostles of Disunion by Charles B. Dew

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the question as to whether states’ rights was the cause of the Civil War, Dew references a speech made by Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, during his inaugural address as one that “remains a classic articulation of the Southern position that resistance to Northern tyranny and a defense of states’ rights were the sole reason for secession. Constitutional differences alone lay at the heart of the sectional controversy, he insisted. ‘Our present condition…illustrates the American idea that governments rest upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish governments whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established’”(13).

    Read More

  • John Marshall, Defender of the Constitutio

    1613 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Francis N. Stites' book, John Marshall, Defender of the Constitution, he tells the story of John Marshall's life by breaking up his life into different roles such as a Virginian, Lawyer, Federalist, National Hero, and as Chief of Justice.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Apostles Of Disunion

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    In, “Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War,” Charles B. Dew analyzes the public letters and speeches of white, southern commissioners in order to successfully prove that the Civil War was fought over slavery. By analyzing the public letters and speeches, Dew offers a compelling argument proving that slavery along with the ideology of white supremacy were primary causes of the Civil War. Dew is not only the Ephraim Williams Professor of American History at Williams College, but he is also a successful author who has received various awards including the Elloit Rudwick Prize and the Fletcher Pratt Award. In fact, two of Dew’s books, Tredegar Iron Works and Apostles of Disunion and Ironmaker to

    Read More

  • Lincoln's Suspension Of Habeas Corpus Analysis

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War not only proved to be the country’s deadliest war but also precipitated one of the greatest constitutional crises in the history of the United States. President Lincoln is revered by many Americans today as a man of great moral principle who was responsible for both preventing the Union’s dissolution as well as helping to trigger the movement to abolish slavery. In retrospect, modern historians find it difficult to question the legitimacy of Lincoln’s actions as President. A more precise review of President Lincoln’s actions during the Civil War, however, reveals that many, if not the majority, of his actions were far from legitimate on constitutional and legal grounds. Moreover, his true political motives reveal his

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq Analysis

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand (Document M)”, said by Abraham Lincoln about how the North and South couldn’t continue being half free and half slave states it would slowly destroy the government that they tried to create. Lincoln also stated that, “Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it… or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become lawful…(Document M)”. Scott Dred a slave while wanting to become a member of the political community as told by the legislative and the historians that, “...a Negro of the African race was regarded by them as an article of property (Document L).” With the help of the rights given to him from the North it was stated that, “..in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned, is not warranted by the Constitution, and is therefore void (Document L).” Politics assisted with the cause of the Civil war because the Southern and Northern views on freedom were too different that their would never be a real resolution that would make both political parties within the states

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun

    3726 Words  | 8 Pages

    ...pate in a society because of race and gender. While the Disquisition of Government, is seen as a great work in American politics, his views, political theory and ideology are off base to certain segments of the American population, and his thoughts would help to maintain slavery.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Fate Of Their Country By W. Holt

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    I felt like the author could clearly show the true contributing factors of the civil war. As an admirer of history, I could use utilize his book for references later on in my academic studies. The book is 127 pages chronicling the events that led to the civil war. Holt gives novices history readers a wonder firsthand look into the world of young America pre-civil war. His book brought out new ways to approach the study of pre-civil war events. The question whether the Civil War was inevitable or could have been derailed was answered in The Fate of Their Country. Holt places the spotlight on the behaviors Politicians and the many congressional compromises that unintendedly involved the actions of the residents of American. These factors at hand placed the Civil war as inevitable. Most of the politician’s views in The Fate of Their Country were egotistical and shortsighted which left gaps in American’s social future. To consider the subject of why, first we need to understand the contributing causes, America’s great expansion project, the Manifest Destiny the driving factor behind the loss of virtue and political discord.

    Read More

  • Gettysburg Address versus Letter to His Son

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thousands of men died in November 1863. Within in a couple of days bodies laid scattered across the battle fields while tens of thousands men sat in a hospital. All of these men participated in one thing, the Civil War. Fighting for the rights of the people and what our constitution stood for. Families and friends had to pick a side, South or the North. Each had their reasoning for why they stood to fight, but surprisingly their reasoning was similar. Each state was proud they live in a country that had broken away from British. They marveled at the idea that all men are created and equal and have certain rights. Americans were proud. Proud to the point that they never stopped pay attention to all that they did. Proud because they put laws on humans and threw them into bondage. In 1861 people started to take sides. In some ways it was unconstitutional, but in others they were fighting for the people. The Civil War had begun. The fate of our country was in the hands of the people. On opposite sides of the war, Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee wrote The Gettysburg Address and Letter to His Son there were three astonishingly similarities and differences in the two works: the people are one, acts were unconstitutional and the nation is on shaky ground.

    Read More

  • Thurgood Mashall: A Major Influence on Law and Equality

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    ..., the combined fighting forces of Thurgood Marshall and the other “fighters” of the Civil Rights Movement were an important part fighting for the equality of all Americans. Thurgood Marshall said in his 1992 4th of July speech, “Knock down the fences that divide. Tear apart the walls that imprison. Reach out; freedom lies just on the other side” (Hitzeroth and Leon 99).

    Read More

  • The Reconstruction of the Union After the Civil War

    2101 Words  | 5 Pages

    SON OF THE SOUTH, Slavery and the Framing of the U.S. Constitution, 2011, retrieved February 21st 2011 from http://www.sonofthesouth.net/slavery/slavery-us-constitution.htm

    Read More

  • Final Analysis Of 'The Myth Of The Lost Cause'

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    I think it was the best essays out of the nine because it actually obliterates the arguments of the neo- Confederates, and went into depth that not only that secession was not all about slavery. The very core main event of the myth is that it was revolving around that the war was fighting for states’ rights rather than slavery, and how the Southern army surpasses the Northern army. I think it is a very important of reading of this kind of topics for the people who are not unaware of the Lost Cause but also calling out to people, who originate the myth were accused of being liars. I found this chapter was the most interesting for myself because I find it amazing how he could be able to solve the myth of the Lost Cause, almost like a mystery case, he provided the evidence and solved the case. It also provided me the overall information of how people can just believe whatever it be told like “my mind is made up” kind of deal. Together with your lectures and the essays were a perfect combination of learning about the Civil War but behind the

    Read More

  • The Creation Of The Constitution

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.

    Read More

  • How can the power of words bring about a positive change in a community?

    902 Words  | 2 Pages

    Words can bring positive change to a community, be it a small town or the entire world - all it takes is two key components, delivery and content. This was certainly the case with Clarence Darrow’s 1926 concluding speech in defence of African American, Henry Sweet, accused of the murder of a white man. Darrow’s monumental eight-hour speech set a legal precedent when Sweet was acquitted of his murder charge. The speech, “Changed the status of Negros before the law and meant in respect to defending ones home and self in self defence, what applied to whites now, in practice and not just in word, apply to African Americans as well.” Clarence Darrow’s speech, along with Henry Sweet’s acquittal, is now considered huge milestone in the civil rights movement.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ry have changed drastically by the time of this address. He believed the Civil War created a “new birth of freedom” within the nation.

    Read More

More about Reflections On The Bicentennial Of The Constitution By Thurgood Marshall Summary

Open Document