Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of corporal punishment on students
Corporal punishment in education
Importance of corporal punishment in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of corporal punishment on students
Students have different levels of motivation, different attitudes, character and different responses to specific classroom environments and instructional practices. Therefore, the understanding of differences towards instructors to students, the better chance of meeting the diverse learning needs of students. In such a way, corporal punishment is one of the major discipline methods of teaching and moulding a child. Hence, it intends to cause physical pain to a person and also it is commonly inflicted on minors in a home or school settings (Cloud, 2015). However, children have a right and through their rights, the practice of corporal punishment is banned whereas is causes a lot of problem in managing students behaviour. Therefore, introducing …show more content…
Many students attend schools with different mindset and attitude that have been moulding them from home. Many times parents often ignore the fact of providing and teaching good discipline procedures in order to have a good self-discipline child. If self-discipline is not taught from home through biblical perspective than teachers must ensure that it is taught in school. Not all schools practice redemptive discipline. However, it is one of the most impact strategies available in moulding student’s behavioural problems. Redemptive discipline is a teaching view to be similar with how God teachers His people (Graham, 2003, p. 265). However, in the book of Romans stated that the main goal of redemptive discipline is not to conform students behaviorally but for students to be “conformed to the image of God” (Romans: 8:29, English standard version). Teachers must base their rules also on the biblical perspective in order to bring students to a point of submitting themselves to the authority of God. In order to achieve this goal, it involves more than a simply regulating behaviour and also being able to lead students to the point of self- discipline where a student can, among other things, recognise, admit and repent of their sin (Tripp, 2001). Redemptive discipline is moulding a student’s behaviour in cooperation with Christ teaching. It enables learners to see Christ more clearly in a way to see how God have created their lives and for them to personally experience His salvation. In redemptive discipline, students’ needs to know that it is Christ who has changed their hearts and moulds their character. Therefore, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, students are able to be restored to the image of God. Teachers must also provide a spirit- filled environment that the student would actually experience Gods present in the classroom.
Schultz also stressed the importance of a biblical worldview in the teacher. As the leader in each classroom the students will adapt their teacher’s beliefs, values and finally actions. If they are taught by a teacher who holds a dualistic view of dividing the sacred and the secular, or a postmodern or modern worldview, it will adversely affect the ability of that child to develop Christ centered wisdom based upon the Word of God. Schultz, in referring to the education of children, stated “anything that hinders their moral and spiritual development is the epitome of child abuse.” (2006, p. 163). As such, our curriculum, teaching methods, and moral example, must all reflect a biblical worldview that will evangelize and discipline each student to know and love Jesus Christ.
Final Exam Kristina McLaughlin Saint Joseph’s University CRJ 565 Question 1: Word Count The judicial system is based on the norms and values that individuals are held to within society. When a person is found guilty of committing a criminal act, there must be a model that serves as the basis of what appropriate punishment should be applied. These models of punishment are often based off of ethical theories and include retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. The retribution model of punishment views the offender as responsible for their actions and as such, the punishment should fit the crime (Mackie, 1982).
Arguably, there are many reasons for punishment, including: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, restoration, and rehabilitation. The main aim of criminal law is to punish anybody who does wrong to the society; however, it is clear that there are different goals and forms of punishment as listen above. Notably, these differences exist because of the severity of the crime and its punishment. A murderer can be sentenced to die but a shoplifter cannot face the same sentence. The first type of punishment, retribution, punishes the crime doer because the system believes that it is right and fair. Therefore, it looks back at the crime and matches it with the best possible punishment (Schmalleger, 2013). The second type, incapacitation, is forward
Citizens are sold on the idea that criminals must be keep off the streets that the punishment must be harsh regardless of the crime, that three strikes and they are out. The justice system does not seem to focus on rehabilitation, rather in the punishment. The public constantly listens to slogans such as “protect our children”, “protect your rights”, and the public recognizes that maybe some of this laws, yet some of the harshest penalties have an ulterior motive. Can society endorse the fact that criminals should rot in jail, regardless of the crime? Think of the impact of an increased jail population on our taxes. For a moment consider the incarcerated population growing because of an increase in crime or
The theory focuses on establishing a class atmosphere by attending directly to students needs, caringly controlling behaviour by adapting effective class rules and consequences so that, learning can take place as intended (Charles, 2005). Additionally, teachers educate students on proper behaviour by specifying rule such as “We raise our hands to speak” that are specific and visible. Teachers use specific reinforcers such as recognition when rules are followed and punishers for breaking them (Eggen & Kauchak, 2001). Therefore, the main principles of AD specify that children behavoural limits and consequences need clarification (Lyons et al., 2014) and have the right that these requirements are taught by an assertive and caring teacher who determinedly works to encourages the best welfare for the students Likewise, teachers have the right to teach students, disruption-free, which is based on a clear classroom discipline plan that is supported by the school and parents (Charles, 2005).Hence, AD is a positively controlled style of discipline endorsed by the
Corporal punishment is a traditional practice of imposing pain, which is commonly used by parents towards children to remove an unpleasant behavior. It is also a physical force towards a child for the purpose of control, and as a disciplinary penalty inflicted on the body. The parents play a pivotal role in honing and disciplining their child with regards to his/her actions. Hitting them with physical objects and forcing them to do cleaning works are some of the ways of discipline, which were done at home. In the year 2000, research, the convention, and law reform – modified the punishment towards children. According to research, 20,000 people in the U.S – particularly those who are 20 years old and above, 1,258 experienced punishment by pushing, grabbing, slapping and hitting. 19,349 people had been reported that they didn’t experience such kind of punishment. Moreover, it is also executed on the children, in order for them to act independently and to visualize the negativities of being careless and dependent to others. Punishment is also
Feinburg (1994, cited in: Easton, 2012: 4) says that punishment is “a symbolic way of getting back at the criminal, of expressing a kind of vindictive resentment”. When punishing an offender there are two key principles that determine the kind of punishment. These are the Retributivism response and the Reductivist response. The first principle, Retributivism, focuses on punishing the offence using 'denunciation' where they denounce the crime that has been committed so society knows they have done wrong, and it also uses 'just deserts' where the equity 'eye for an eye' is the main idea. The second principle, Reductivism, believes that deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation is the best strategy to use to punish, its aim is to reduce crime and use punishment to serve a purpose. This essay will look closer and outline the purpose of just deserts and deterrence as punishment in society, although these punishments are used widely across most crimes, this essay will look specifically at prolific offenders.
Provide the justifications for punishment in modern society. Punishment functions as a form of social control and is geared towards “imposing some unwanted burden such as fines, probations, imprisonment, or even death” on a convicted person in return for the crimes they committed (Stohr, Walsh, & Hemmens, 2013, p.6). There are four main justifications for punishment and they are: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. There is also said to be a fifth justification of reintegration as well.
The criminal justice system is the system of law enforcement that takes an extensive position in prosecuting, defending, sentencing, and punishing those who are suspected or convicted of criminal offenses. It is essential to know the many theories of punishment that the justice system has created in their minds that eventually became a part of society. This paper will analyze the theoretical explanations of punishment and their effect on society by generating an opinion of how each type of punishment deters crime the best and if punishment provides any benefit to the offenders and to society.
Training police to enact broken-windows or zero-tolerance policies upon youths, who have, more than likely, only experienced areas of high-crime throughout their lives, is not the way to stop them from committing crime in their lifetime. These types of police tactics, when administered to juveniles, are more likely to skew the child’s view of themselves and their self-worth, serving to create, not only a distrust towards authority figures, but also a person who genuinely believes that they are destined to nothing more than a life of crime. Perhaps if officers were more lenient with inner-city youths, they would be more likely to see police as helpful and more likely to realize that the decisions that they make do have an effect on the outcome
Punishment has been in existence since the early colonial period and has continued throughout history as a method used to deter criminals from committing criminal acts. Philosophers believe that punishment is a necessity in today’s modern society as it is a worldwide response to crime and violence. Friedrich Nietzche’s book “Punishment and Rehabilitation” reiterates that “punishment makes us into who we are; it creates in us a sense of responsibility and the ability to take and release our social obligations” (Blue, Naden, 2001). Immanuel Kant believes that if an individual commits a crime then punishment should be inflicted upon that individual for the crime committed. Cesare Beccaria, also believes that if there is a breach of the law by individuals then that individual should be punished accordingly.
One of the oldest and most fundamental justifications for punishment is the principle of retribution: predating modern society, the basic system of punishment is embedded in Hebrew Law, emphasizing the idea of an “eye for an eye”. According to this principle, also known as lex talionis, we ought to treat people as they treated others: what people deserve as recipients of punishments is determined by what they do as agents. Yet, this idea of an “eye for an eye” is neither constrained by questions of offender responsibility nor directed at preventing future wrongdoing - offenders under this retributive philosophy simply get what they deserve. But does society have the right to punish, and, more importantly, how does society judge the severity
Secondly, corporal punishment in schools should not be permitted is because it can lead to harmful effects in a student’s health. Because according to Science Daily “a child in a school that uses corporal punishment has performed worst in tasks involving executive functioning-- such as, for example: planning, abstract thinking, and delaying gratification.” In addition, according to Social Development, “harshly punitive environm...
In the context of Christian education, the teacher performs his role by using lessons culled from the Bible and communicating them through lectures, seminars, or discussions. However, in order to be an effective teacher, I should expand on these lessons by providing real-life examples and hypothetical illustrations in order for the student to find relevance in the lessons taught. I should provide good models for the student to imitate, and in fact, I should also make sure that I am a good model myself by knowing and taking to heart all the lessons I teach. In other words, the instruction must be thorough. To ensure that I am fulfilling my role as teacher, I must provide an opportunity for the students to respond to the lesson. According to the Richards and Bredfeldt, when a student discovers a relationship between himself and the lesson, the “pathway to personal response stands open.” By making the lessons individually applied, decentralized and student-centered, but teacher-oriente...
Discipline plays a key part in education. Respect from your students will make the classroom a better atmosphere. Rules should be established on the first day. Rules should be a thoughtful process so they can be carried out to be affective, but logical consequences. We do not want the students self esteem to be damaged.