Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparisons between Christianity and Hinduism
Comparisons between Christianity and Hinduism
How is Jesus portrayed in Matthew's gospel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparisons between Christianity and Hinduism
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, martyrdom is defined as the suffering of death out of obedience to a cause, especially to one's religious faith. But the Greek origin of the word “martyr” sums it up into one word, which is “witness”. In the cases that I will be discussing, the martyrs are witnesses to their faith, to the only true good that exists (God). Within Christianity, there are degrees of martyrdom, even if what we typically think of when we hear the word “martyr” is someone who has been murdered for their beliefs (and refusing to change and/or deny them). One homily, given around the 7th century in Ireland, discusses these degrees of martyrdom. Christian martyrdom gives way to relationship with God, especially when considering …show more content…
In fact, the first martyr of the Church was recognized as a red martyr. Saint Stephen is mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles. He was a deacon in the early Church in Jerusalem who upset a lot of Jewish authority by proclaiming the teachings of Jesus. Jewish authorities accused him of blasphemy and even used false witnesses to accuse him. It’s rather reminiscent of the accusation of Christ, simply showing the imitation of Christ as a pathway to God. Upon his final moments, St. Stephen looks towards the heavens to see them opened, with the “Son of Man standing at the right hand of God” (Acts 7:56). As he was stoned, Stephen called out to Christ, asking Him to “receive [his] spirit”, and promptly fell asleep. Again, this draws a similarity between Christ’s death and the protomartyr, as well as his reception into …show more content…
Gianna Beretta Molla. Many classify her as a white martyr because of her deep devotion to her unborn child before her death. When she was pregnant with her fourth child in 1961, Gianna developed a fibroma on her uterus during the second month of pregnancy. After further examination, doctors gave her three options on how to proceed. The first choice was abortion, and direct abortion is forbidden by the Catholic Church as human life is to be protected always (CCC, 2270-1), even though the abortion would save her life and even allow her to continue to have children. The second choice was a complete hysterectomy which would save her life, but leave her incapable of having any more children. In addition, it could have an unintended consequence of her unborn child’s death. Due to the principle of double effect (Aquinas, article 7) this would be allowed, simply because the primary goal is Gianna’s wellbeing and not the death of the child. The third choice was removal of only the fibroma, with the knowledge of further complications with the unborn child’s birth. Gianna Molla opted for the third option, because it had the best chance of preserving her child’s life (Pacholczyk). In April of 1962, Gianna Molla went to the hospital and successfully had her fourth child by Caesarean section. Gianna and her condition, however, soon declined rapidly. She continued to have severe pain, an elevated fever, and a weak pulse. After seven days she died of septic
...s driven by non-maleficence, or the intent to “do no harm”. They know that withholding treatment for religious beliefs will potentially be fatal to both. While Maria is acting out of loyalty to her religious beliefs, the medical staff is acting out of loyalty to the patient’s well being and that of her unborn child. It would be unfair if no party were acting on behalf of that child. In conclusion, providers in this case must pursue every option in delivering life saving treatment for this child. This may involve legal action. If it were just Maria providers may attempt to influence her decision, but ultimately it would be up to her to refuse suggested treatment. Since her decision affects the life of the baby providers are called upon to save that child .
According to the BBC, Charlotte Wyatt was an infant born three months premature in October 2003. This premature birth has caused complications including severe brain damage. The medical professionals caring for Charlotte acknowledged this, predicting that she would live no more than a few months, regardless of medical care. Charlotte remained living under hospital care as she received medical treatment, including things like constant oxygen supply, and at this point, she did not respond to stimulation but appeared to be suffering significant pain. She continued to outlive doctor’s predictions as these conditions continued for months.
In both The Martyrdom of Saints Perpetua and Felicity and Appeal to the Christian Women of the South, the women in the stories are using scripture to explain and justify the claims they make about their faith and the faith of others. They do this by sharing stories about their life and events in their lives to show how the spirit has been moved into them. Both texts describe how these women see themselves as readers of the Bible, what religious authority each is claiming, and what new social reality each woman is arguing that is in keeping of God’s will for human beings.
Justin Martyr explains that the people are demons, while Tertullian proclaims that is not the individual who is evil; it is the soul of the individual. Therefore when the martyrs are prosecuted it is not because they believe in Christianity it is because deep down inside they are channeling their evilness to those who are trying to an explanation or philosophic view on God. Justin focuses more on persuading the readers, giving them facts, and other situations to refer to. Tertullian, whom believes in divine revelation, does not even refer to the bible; he feels as if what better evidence than God himself is.
A martyr is a person that defends a principle, even though it means giving up everything that is important to that person (Webster 236). Some martyr's are put in jail for standing up for Jesus Christ or God. Most martyrs are killed because of their beliefs. Martyrs are the strange ones who challenge society with a different way of thinking. They are the rebels and heretics of today (dc Talk 6). For some, standing up for Jesus actually means dying for Him (dc Talk 7). In John 15:13 NIV Jesus says, "Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends." Today some people refer to martyrs as Jesus Freaks. The very nature of Jesus Freaks is to thrust away from the mob mentality, away from the things that society tells us to care about (dc Talk 8).
Pathos is the one of the most that the author use to describe the article. According to “All Abortions Must Be Illegal” Brown writes, “When removing a cancerous uterus, the intent is to save the mother; every effort to save the child should still be made. Thus, even if the child dies, the treatment is still fully justified” (Brown). Thus, Dr. Alan says; “Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffer from a fatal illness such as cancer or leukemia, and if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save life”. In others words, for some reason some women choose to abort because if born there child may be disabled, but this is not an excuse for abortion. Most people with any disabilities say that they are happy to be alive and would rather be alive than have been aborted. Also, for any women to choose to abort may be many physical medical complications and they will occur during the abortion they may be low but they can
Surprisingly, the Christian martyrs did not care that they were sentenced to death. They believed that by dying for what they believe, it would only bring them closer to God and the Gates of Heaven. The document states, “For this cause have we devoted our lives, that we might do no such thing as this; this we agreed with you” (para. 18). To the martyrs, nothing was more important than fulfilling God’s duties.
These courageous people were not afraid of being persecuted and were willing to die for their faith in order to prove that they really did believe in God. They wanted to set an example for others so that they too may believe and spread the word to others. The narrator believes that martyrs were "truly called and chosen for the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ" (9). The narrator also believed that martyrs were important in that they were "examples for the building up of the Church" (9). While this may first appear to be referring to building a physical church, the church actually has a more symbolic meaning. Since the people are considered to be the Church, the building of the Church is referring to building up the faithful and spreading the word to others. They wanted anyone who was willing to honor and adore God in all His glory to be members of the
Abortion, like any other medical procedure, carries some risks. When one considers, however, that “the risk of death associated with childbirth is about 10 times as high as that associated with abortion” (“Know the Facts”), the threat of abortion suddenly does not seem as perilous. Additionally, contrary to popular misconception, abortion does not contribute to future infertility or development of breast cancer. It is therefore safer and more prudent to have an abortion than an unwanted pregnancy.
Hysterectomy is a common surgical procedure in the United States, with approximately 600,000 hysterectomies performed each year (Whiteman et al., 2008). Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus and may be accompanied by bilateral or unilateral oophorectomy (Appiah, 2015). Rates of hysterectomies increased, from years 1965-2002. Since then a 34% reduction in hysterectomy rates has been reported, in 2010 (Lobo, 2016). Hysterectomy may be accompanied by the removal of one or both of the ovaries to decrease the risk of ovarian cancer and in some cases for an indication other than cancer, such as treating fibroid tumors or excess bleeding (Moorman, 2011).
The Gospel of Matthew is an eyewitness story written for an audience of believers, under great stress, and persecution. Matthew develops a theological plot incorporating genealogy, speeches, parables, inter and intra textual references, common vocabulary, and fulfillment quotations, with a tension that builds as we are invited into the story. The crucifixion and resurrection bring us to a Christological climax that symbolically points beyond its conclusion to God’s Kingdom, bringing atonement, salvation and the ushering in the Eschaton. The extraordinary events surrounding the crucifixion act as commentary, adding important details concerning the death of Jesus.1
The primary issue in this article is whether or not abortion is still wrong even if the fetus is preserved after it is removed from the body of the mother. In a traditional legal abortion the fetus is removed and put to death. With new technology the fetus can be preserved so that it can still produce a child at a later time or in another persons body. The issue of abortion is broken up into two aspects according to the author: (1) the expulsion of the fetus and (2) the death to the fetus. Because of these two aspects two rights are created: (1) the right of the mother to control her own body and (2) the right of the fetus to life.
When she went into surgery in St. John’s Medical Center in St. Louis, we were all there and confidant that everything would go as planned. The doctors came out about one hour into the surgery to inform us that the damage was much worse than they initially thought. They told us that they would keep us updated on her progress. Two hours later they came out to tell us that her heart stopped beating and they tried everything they could to revive her, but she had died.
In such positions, the resolution to terminate a pregnancy may be argued as the most ethical choice. The mother is also considered to have a reasonable level of ethical responsibility to the fetus, because she did not take enough precautions to ensure avoid conception (Cline, 2014). The mother’s ethical responsibility to the fetus may not be enough to deprive her of choice of abortion; it may be enough to ascertain when an abortion can be ethically selected (Cline, 2014). When a woman does not wish to carry an abortion to term, it will be unethical for law or any other person to force them to do so.... ...
...ctions. Peter answered with the Spirit. The power by which the crippled man was healed was that of Jesus of Nazareth. Not only that, but Peter accused the Sanhedrin of responsibility for rejecting and killing Christ. He also noted God’s power in raising Jesus from the dead. Peter’s speech to the Sanhedrin summarizes his other two sermons. Although they were unable to deny the apostolic miracle, the Sanhedrin felt compelled to stop the apostolic preaching. Before the power of God that transformed unschooled, ordinary men into powerful proclaim of the gospel, the Sanhedrin was unable to punish the apostles. This chapter ends with a report of the church’s prayer in gratitude for God’s deliverance of the apostles from the Jewish authorities.