Reconstruction Film Summary

543 Words2 Pages

The main explicit argument found throughout this film is that the time of lynching was a terrible time for African Americans in the south. This is clearly supported by the multiple accounts of lynching told by the decedents of people present during these episodes of lynching along with well-educated historians who have reputable knowledge of these events. These people tell stories of different lynching events that happened along with giving insight as to how terrifying it was to be an African American during this time period. For example, Thelma Dangerfield talks of how when a white man would come to her door when she was a child, her dad would answer the door with her brother hiding behind him with a gun just in case because they were so fearful for their lives. In Thomas W. Wilson's passage about reconstruction he talks about the various organizations that were spreading throughout the south around this time to oppress former slaves. He talks of various different Ku Klux Klans that were formed to attack and intimidate the blacks. They participated in the lynching of innocent African Americans. …show more content…

This brings us to one of the implicit arguments of the film, that the blacks who lived during this time were strong and would not back down. They were equal to white people and were strong enough to show it. Many of the people in the film talked about how their ancestors would not back down from fighting for their rights. For example, Kimberly Wilson talked about how her ancestor Jon Mitchell Jr. was targeted after he wrote about the horrors of lynching in his newspaper. Instead of running away to the north to escape the death threats he was getting, he stayed in town. Wilson said "this was a test [to] show them that he will come here and confront him" which is exactly what he

Open Document