Rebuttal To James Sullivan's Letter To John Adams

477 Words1 Page

In late May of 1776, the lawyer, John Adams, wrote a rebuttal to James Sullivan’s opinion on representation in the legislative process and who should be allowed to participate. Adams had learned of these views after reading Sullivan’s letter, which was originally addressed to Mr. Gerry; this letter highlighted what Sullivan believed to be flaws with the political system of the day and, to be more specific, who should be allowed to take part. To say that Adams disagreed with the ideas presented would, in many ways, minimize his response. John Adams had a very clear cut definition of who was competent enough and worthy enough to bear the weight of the full rights of citizenship, ultimately, the right to make decisions for the masses. James Sullivan argued, in his letter, that governments are permitted to exist by the people they serve; every individual under the government should have a voice to give or deny his “consent” of government and the laws they enact. If one does not give his consent to the government, “he owes no obedience” to it. Thus, if every person has to give their opinion about the laws for the laws to apply to everyone, then it follows that everyone deserves the …show more content…

Adams contends that it implausible to have every single person, “old and young, male and female, as well as rich and poor, must consent” to every law. He follows by asking how a governing system can possibly have the right to rule as a majority over the minorities. Expanding upon this, Adams delivers a challenging contradiction: women were prohibited from voting due to the thought that they were only qualified in “domestic cares” and relied on a man for survival. By that logic, men who were “destitute of property” and “too dependent upon other men” should also be considered incompetent concerning knowing what is in the interest of the

Open Document