Reality of War in Attack by Siegfried Sasson and Anthem for Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen

579 Words2 Pages

Reality of War in Attack by Siegfried Sasson and Anthem for Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen In my opinion both poems express effectively how terrible it was to be a soldier in the First World War. However, I believe 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' is more effective than 'attack' because of the amount of emotive language used. Looking first of all at the way the two poems convey the setting of their poems. 'Attack' opens with a highly visual image of the battlefield, 'At dawn the ridge emerges massed and dun'. This approach to the setting is deliberate. The poet intends to form an image in your mind because it helps to put across the hostility of war. By contrast 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' does not reveal it's setting until the second line. This allows the poet to give the image of a massed slaughter, he then tells us where the slaughter is, the battlefield. Later the poet changes the setting his chosen setting for the sestet is the home front. I believe this makes 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' a more effective description of the setting because it has already given of a very dramatic statement already. Both poems clearly share similarities of intention. It is to tell people of the horrors of war and the inevitability of the most brutal of deaths. This is shown in lines 'Men jostle and climb to meet the bristling fire.' And 'lines of gray muttering faces, masked with fear' in the poem 'Attack' and yet again in the poem 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' the lines 'What passing bells for those who die as cattle?' and 'What candles may be held to speed them all?' show the power of the poets vision which he wishes to communicate to the reader. But there is second intention in 'Anthem for Doomed Youth'. That is the impact on the people at home. This difference as I see it makes 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' more effective because of its double value. Another area of difference is the form of the poems. Owen has chosen a

Open Document