Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of literature on financial performance in ratio analysis
Analysis of financial statement
Analysis of financial statement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ratio Analysis In order to make inferences about a company’s financial condition, its operations, and its attractiveness as an investment we have analyzed financial ratios and compare ratios derived from SVU’s financial statements (see chart 1). Gross Profit Margin The gross profit margin ratio is used to show how much of each sales dollar is left after certain costs are covered (footnote). Looking at the table, Supervalu has increased its gross profit margin from 14.4% in 2015 to 14.7% in 2016 (in millions of dollars). This shows that net income for 2015 was 14.4 percent of sales and in 2016 increased to 14.7 percent of sales. Likewise, Walmart has increased its gross profit margin from 24.8% in 2014 to 25.1% in 2016 (in millions of dollars). …show more content…
This is important because you make money when you sell inventory. The quicker you sell it the more money a company will make. Supervalu had an inventory turnover of 17.05 in 2014 and decreased to 14.80 in 2016(footnote: morning star key ratios). To determine this ratio we look at the relationship between sales and inventory. This means the Supervalu converted its inventory into sales 17.05 times, which on average was sold and replaced 17.05 times and increased to 14.80 in during this period. On the other hand, Walmart has a significantly lower turnover ratio averaging 8.08 over the last three years. Furthermore, looking at the day inventory shows that Walmart holds inventory longer before selling than SuperValu. There are many reasons why they hold inventory longer than the industry. This is not good for the company because they could be overstocking. Another problem could be ordering food during seasons when consumers are not purchasing in enough volume to beat expiration …show more content…
With these pieces we can analyze the firm’s efficiency in expense control, asset consumption and use of debt, and see how each contributes to ROE. Looking at the table below, SuperValu, Inc. has a total asset turnover of 4.01 and a net profit margin of .01. The total assets to equity ratio for the firm is -9.91. ROE = net profit margin X total asset turnover X total assets to equity ratio = -39.74% for FY 2016. Looking at the tables below, we can see that Supervalu has a negative return on equity (ROE) for the last three years. The negative ROE for 2014 through 2016 is a result of its total assets to equity. A negative ROE occurs when a company or business has a financial loss or bland returns on an investment during a specific period of time. When a business 's return on equity is negative, it means its shareholders are losing, rather than gaining, value. A negative ROE is not something good for the company since most investors avoid placing their money in a company that fails to consistently deliver positive
The first analysis will be on Verizon. The current ratio and the debt to equity ratio both improved in 2006 when compared to 2005. However, the net profit margin dropped from 9.8% to 7.0%. What does this tell us as investors...
Return on assets is also decreasing and less than industry average. For example, in 1995 it was 4.7%, less than the average of 6.
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
Return on equity (ROE) measures profitability from the stockholders perspective. The ROE is a calculation of the return earned on the common stockholders' investment in the firm. Generally, the higher this return, the better off the stockholders are. Harley Davidson's return on equity was 24.92% for 2001, 24.74% for 2000. They have sustained consistent, positive, returns for their shareholders for the past two years.
The Dupont analysis shows that every dollar of assets generates 2.44 in sales which is great considering it was already good in 2014 and 2015 and keeps improving each year, the equity multiplier is 2.516 indicating that ROE is generated through efficient use of equity and leverage of 60% that can be increased slightly to surge ROE.
Description: Return on Equity (ROE) indicates what each owner’s dollar is producing in terms of net income that is the rate of return on stockholder dollars. ROE is a common metric for assessing the value of a firm and most investors look to ROE first when deciding where to allocate their capital. As such, it is also an important measure for a CEO to monitor.
Profitability ratios express ability of the company to produce profit. This shows how well a company is performing in a given period of time. To compare the profitability for the companies, the investors use profitability ratios that are return on equity, profit margin, asset turnover, gross profit, earning per share. Return on asset indicates overall profitability of assets. It is the relationship between net income and average total assets. GM has 0.034 and Ford has 0.036. This indicates Ford is more profitable. Profit margin is how much of every dollar of sales the company keeps. Computing profit margin, net income divided by net sales. This indicates higher profit margin is more profitable and it has better control. Thus, GM’s profit margin is 3.4 percentages and Ford’s is 4.9 percentages. This indicates Ford has better control profitably compared to GM. Next ratio is gross profit rate. It is how much of every dollar is left over after paying costs of goods sold. Assets turnover represents how efficiency a company uses its assets to sales. This ratio is relationship between net sales and average total assets. GM’s is 0.98 and Ford’s is 0.75. This result represents GM is using its assets more efficiently. Gross profit margin is dividing gross profit, which is equal to net sales less cost of gods sold, by net sales. This ratio indicates ability to maintain selling price above its cost of goods sold. GM’s gross profit rate is 11.6 percentages. Ford’s is 5.7 percentages. GM is higher ratio, and it indicates strong net income. Also, it indicates the company has to spend lower operating expenses and the company is able to spend left money for covering fixed costs. Earnings per share indicate the company’s net earnings to each share common stock. This ratio shows margin between selling price and cost of goods sold. From these companies’ income statement, GM is $2.71 and Ford is $1.82. Because GM’s value is higher relative to Ford’s,
According to table 1 above CVS had the lowest gross profit ratio at below 18.76 in 2013 falling slightly to 18.2 in 2014. Walgreen had impressive figures with a gross profit ratio of 71.77 in the year 2014 while Rite Aid had a gross profit ratio of 28.69 % in the year 2014. According to Murphy, Trailer and Hill (1996), the general norm in business is that the higher the Gross profit ratio the better the business is in managing its operations.
The analysis of these ratios shows how Ford stands as a company for the past five years. Return on equity (ROE) reveals how much profit a company earned in comparison to the total amount of shareholder equity on the balance sheet. For long-term investing with great rewards, companies that have high return on equity ratios can provide the biggest payoffs. This ratio also tells investors how effectively their capital is being reinvested, so it is a good gauge of management's money handling skills. Ford is showing a considerable turn around in this area this past year, which could easily be due to changes in management. They are also reasonably following the industry in this area.
At the end of 2013, the return on assets was 0.68% and at the end of 2014, the return on assets was -0.44%.
The financial position of a company offers great insight on the performance of the company on short-term and long-term basis. This work argues that Facebook Inc. is a company with a subjective investment portfolio. The purpose of this paper is to use ratio analysis to determine the position of the Facebook as an investment destination. The first section explores two ratios and their implications to a potential investor. The second part evaluates whether Facebook is bankrupt. The succeeding section offers advice to potential investors. The work culminates by highlighting key points and making necessary recommendations.
This clearly indicates that the earnings power of Competition Bikes declined in year 8. TWS had a slightly better earnings per share in year 8. There was also a notable a notable decline in the return on total assets. This indicates that the return of profit from investment for every unit of total assets declined. TWR had a better ratio of 4.8% signifying a signifying a higher return of profit from investment for every unit of total assets invested. The return of profitability for every unit of equity contributed by shareholders declined in year 8 as indicated by the return on common equity. TWS shareholders had far much better profitability for every unit of equity contributed by shareholders. This profitability ratio indicates that a unit of equity in TWR contributes 0.081 as profit attributable to shareholders compared to 0.014 in Competition Bikes
For 1300SMILES, shareholders can see how much the company make money through the profit margin and the return on equity(ROE). The profit margin and ROE declined over the past four years (1300SMILES, n.d.), and this effect is negative for company. Decreasing of the profit margin and ROE also is related to asset efficiency. Asset efficiency tests on efficiency of management in the used of assets to increase sales revenue, and it includes asset turnover. The asset turnover ratio decreased over the past four years as well (1300SMILES, n.d.). Since the company’s profit margin, ROE, and asset turnover fell down, the sales revenue per one dollar assets would go down. It would also hard for 1300SMILES to maintain a high degree of liquidity, because the company earns less
- Conducted several financial analysis using value creation models, NPV and profitability ratios such as ROI, ROE, ROCE and income statement ratios, which also included risk profiling through beta measurements, operational risk and financial risk;
Looking at the previously conducted profitability ratios for Blackberry, we can notice that all the ratios are not only lower than Apple’s, but have also decreased throughout 2011 until 2013. However, for Apple, all conducted profitability ratios are increasing throughout a three-year time span, from 2010 to 2012. Gross margin measures the relationship between sales and the costs that support these sales. Blackberry’s gross margin has decreased from 2011-2013. It was 44% in 2011, but decreased to 35% in 2012.