1.
Vertical analysis
Competition Bikes witnessed an increase in gross profit margin in year 7 at 27.4 having risen from 26.6% in the year 6. This is an indicator of the increase in Gross Profit in relation to sales. Year 8 however witnessed a marginal decline in Gross Profit margin which was reported at 27.0%. The 0.4% decline in Gross Profit margin between year 8 and 7 signifies that there was a proportional increase the amount of sales revenue that was taken up by the cost of sales. As a result, it is in order to state that there was a proportional decline of the gross profit by 0.4% of the total sales revenue and an increase in cost of sales by 0.4%.
The total selling expenses in relation to sales remained constant over the three years.
…show more content…
This clearly indicates that the earnings power of Competition Bikes declined in year 8. TWS had a slightly better earnings per share in year 8. There was also a notable a notable decline in the return on total assets. This indicates that the return of profit from investment for every unit of total assets declined. TWR had a better ratio of 4.8% signifying a signifying a higher return of profit from investment for every unit of total assets invested. The return of profitability for every unit of equity contributed by shareholders declined in year 8 as indicated by the return on common equity. TWS shareholders had far much better profitability for every unit of equity contributed by shareholders. This profitability ratio indicates that a unit of equity in TWR contributes 0.081 as profit attributable to shareholders compared to 0.014 in Competition Bikes
In year 8, Competition Bikes witnessed a decline in price/earnings ratio. However, TWR had a higher price/earnings ratio. This is good for Competition Bikes, shareholders since it takes a shorter*** time to recover the market value of equity compared to TWR shareholders. In year 8, Competition Bikes witnessed an adverse decline in time interest earned. The high time interest earned of 4.24 for TWR indicates that the operating profit can pay interest charges 4.24 times compared to 1.77 in Competition
This requirement makes it important to look through a majority of the return ratios, which include return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity. Additionally, investors are also interested in the ratios related to the company’s earnings, such as earnings per share (EPS) and PE ratio. Looking at return on sales, we can see that Wendy’s has a 7.27% return on sales and Bob Evans has a 1.23%, which demonstrates Wendy’s has a higher profit margin. Moreover, Wendys’ return on assets is 2.85% and Bob Evans is 1.58%. Also, Wendy’s and Bob Evan 's have return on equity ratios of 6.66% and 4.30%, respectively. All of these return ratios show that Wendy’s has a better handle on turning working capital into revenue. On the other hand, although Wendy’s return ratios are higher than Bob Evans, Bob Evans has a better performance on earnings per share and PE ratio. This is due to Bob Evans having less common stock share outstanding, which makes their earnings per share and PE ratio higher than Wendy’s. Due to the EPS being higher for Bob Evans, we would recommend that investors look towards Bob
...ense has decreased 82.8% from 2000 to 2004. All the above are contributing factors in Applebee’s achieving higher earnings, a 75% increase in net earnings from 2000 to 2004. Average shares has fall due to consistent share repurchasing programs by Applebee’s. Overall, the common-size analysis of the income statement are relatively consistent over the five years of study. Cost of goods has stayed consistent between 74%-75%, the Depreciation and amortization is between 9%-11%, income from Continue operations and Net Income are also both between 9%-10% in common-size analysis for income Statement. No unusual flutuations has been discovered.
Speedster Athletics Company has been able to generate favourable gross margins over the last three years consistently over the industry average of 26%. Gross margin is in a declining trend over 2010 to 2011 where 2011 gross margin is 27% (1371/5075*100%) which is 1% lower than 2011, however this is above the industry average level, proving that Speedster company is capable of generating better margins.
7. Sales had dropped in 1993 but operating profit margins increased due to increase in
(d) The account receivable growth rate from 2012 to 2013 was a decrease of 5.52% whereas the allowance for doubtful accounts went up by 12.10%. The sales account had a growth rate of 33.81%. From these numbers we see that the sales of Hydrogenics Corporation increased from 2012 to 2013. Since there was a decrease in the accounts receivable,
The 3 percent decline in sales causing a 21 percent decline in profits can be attributed to the identification of the accounting concept of operating leverage. Operating leverage is what business managers apply to boost small changes in revenue into sizable changes in profitability. Fixed cost is the force managers use to attain disproportionate changes between revenue and profitability. Therefore, when all costs are fixed every sales dollar contributes one dollar toward the potential profitability of a project. Once sales dollars cover fixed costs, each additional sales dollar represents pure profit. A small change in sales volume can significantly affect profitability (Edmonds, Tsay, & Olds, 2011). So, therefore, if sales volume increases,
The first analysis will be on Verizon. The current ratio and the debt to equity ratio both improved in 2006 when compared to 2005. However, the net profit margin dropped from 9.8% to 7.0%. What does this tell us as investors...
Return on sales is decreasing and is below the industry average, but the goods news is that sales and profits have been increasing each year. However, costs of goods are increasing and more inventory is left over each year causing the return on sales to decrease. For 1995, it was 1.7% which is less than the average of 2.44% but is a lot higher than the bottom 25% of companies as seen in exhibit 3, which actually have negative sales return of 0.7%. Return on equity is increasing each year and at a higher rate than industry average. In 1995, it was 20.7%, greater than the average of 18.25% and close to the highest companies in exhibit 3, of 22.1% showing that the return in investment in the company is increasing, which is good for the owner.
The return on total assets (ROA) is an overall measure of profitability which measures the total effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. This ratio indicates the amount of net income generated by each dollar invested in assets. The higher the firm's return on total assets, the better. Harley Davidson's return on total assets was 14.04% for 2001, 14.27% for 2000. These percentages are high and show an upward trend, this shows strong performance in this area for the past two years.
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders’ equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
The Dupont analysis includes the asset turnover ratio, the profit margin percantage, return on shareholder’s equity percentage, return on assets, and the equity multiplier (Spiceland, Sepe, and Nelson 258-264). The asset turnover ratio is the amount of revenue received for every one dollar of assets, it reveals how efficiently the company is distributing assets. Apple’s asset turnover ratio is 60.43 which means for every one dollar Apple has in assets, they receive approximately sixty cents (Apple Inc). Microsoft’s asset turnover ratio is 13.17 so for every dollar they only receive about thirteen cents (Microsoft Inc). Apple is doing significantly better in this category. The profit margin is just how much of a company’s sales they keep as a profit. Apple’s profit margin is 21.67% while Microsoft has a 28% profit margin so Microsoft is accumulating more profit off each sale but their sales are lower. The return on shar...
Each division’s performance had been judged on the basis of its profit and return on investment for several years. The said practice creates competition among the company’s divisions because each makes sure that it is more profitable than the others. As such was the case, there was high possibility that one division was enjoying profit at the expense of the other(s).
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
This financial ratio analysis will help to identify Rolls-Royce’s strength and weaknesses during three years period from 2011 until the end of 2013. While it is a helpful tool for investors to make investment decisions base on profitability of the company, managers can make strategic decisions of the company. However, there are some limitations in using financial ratio analysis alone when make decisions. Comparing ratios with the industry norm and with the company’s rivals, the user of the financial ratio analysis will be able to anticipate future prospects. Rolls-Royce’s nearest rivals are General Electric (GE) and Pratt & Whitney, owned by United Technologies Corporation (UTC). These world 's top three companies are investing massively in R&D to satisfy demand of a booming global market for environmentally cleaner, energy efficient power engines that result in a huge number of orders of commercial airliners. All top
The times interest earned ratio uses a company’s income statement to assess its ability to meet long-...