Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discoveries in the scientific revolution
Discoveries in the scientific revolution
Discoveries in the scientific revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discoveries in the scientific revolution
In today’s scientific world, research studies are in constant process leading to new discoveries. Every scientific discovery is rooted off a simple foundation that is then elaborated through years of research by various professionals. Therefore, it is important to understand where a specific finding originated from and how it evolved over the years – acknowledging the story behind the story. In such manner, highlighting one of the well known neuroscience research is the study on the reorganization of an adult brain. This topic has been monitored for several centuries by various scientists. In particular, a neuroscientist named Vilayanur Subramanian Ramachandran is known for his breakthrough contribution on the study of the adult brain and its …show more content…
capability of reorganization. In order to find the details of his work and get a better understanding on the topic, Web of Science search engine was used. As Web of Science carries numerous scientific works, the use of filter option helped simplify the search. Once the author’s Last name and First name was entered, I used key words such as “adult brain” and “reorganization” to restrict the search to the specifics of Ramachandran’s work. I filtered the results to only peer-reviewed journal articles as a key paper should consist of a detailed description of the work with specific research methodologies. The abstract gave a gist of what the article consists of and the key words such as “Massive cortical reorganization” helped in identifying the relevance of the paper. I also looked at the number of times the work was cited as it portrays the effectiveness and popularity of the paper. The key paper that I found relevant to this topic is “The Perception of phantom limbs” by V.S Ramachandran in partnership with William Hirstien published in the journal Brain (1998).
Ramachandran’s work on the reorganization of the brain is mainly focused on the theory of the interdependency between the mind and the body(Ramachandran, 1998). He focused on this particular aspect through the study of phantom limbs- painful conditions in the limb after an amputation. With the help of previous findings such as the use of MEG, Ramachandran states that the adult brain consists of organized somatosensory maps that is affiliated with the senses and stores the memories into place. (Ramachandran, 1993). Therefore, when an individual’s arm or leg is amputated, the memories and the functionalities of the body part still remains in place. In scientific terms, the sensory map of the body is known to exist in the somatosensory cortex where the reorganization takes place. (Ramachandran, 1998). Through his detailed research on the phantom limbs, Ramachandran introduced the notion of “learned paralysis” where once the body part is amputated the brain learns that the body part is not functional anymore (Ramachandran, 1998). Ramachandran argued that if the brain is capable of learning such notion, then there must be a way for it to unlearn and reorganize. He justified this specific theory through his mirror box experiment where the patient’s normal hand is reflected where the amputee hand is
creating an illusion and indirectly convincing the patient that the deformed arm is functional again. (Ramachandran, 1998) Ramachandran’s publication of “The Perception of Phantom Limbs” is heavily based on a combination of various works that has been cited. This shows that this topic has been under research for several years. Specifically, Ramachandran used the presence of the somatosensory system for his learned paralysis theory where he mentions that the sensory mapping takes place in the somatosensory cortex (Ramachandran, 1998). This specific finding is rooted from Wall and Wolstencroft in 1977 in one of their works “The presence of ineffective synapses”. The article focused on three specific regions of the sensory system noticing the opening of connecting pathways in adult brains. (Wall & Wolstencroft, 1977). Additionally, Ramachandran has elaborated furthermore on Wall’s work on plasticity. Ramachandran’s work in 1993 focuses on the use of MEG and its correlation of plasticity in the adult brain which is a further build up on the previous work conducted by Wall. Ramachandran’s work focuses on the use of microelectrodes and how the MEG shows the visual perspective of somatotrophic reorganization in the adult brain (Ramachandran, 1993). Following this, in 1994, along with the others Ramachandran published his work on the cortical somatosensory topography. This work further expands the research on cortical topography and non-invasive detection of plasticity (Yang et al., 1994) All of the supporting publications that I found were derived off the key paper used which was later published in 1998. Through reading Ramachandran’s article on Phantom limbs, I noticed that his findings were heavily based of the 3 publications listed. Therefore, it is evident that this topic of the reorganization of the adult brain has been a continued research.
Phantom pain refers to the phenomenal experience of pain in a body part that has been amputated or deafferented (Flor, Nikolajsen & Jensen, 2006). The characteristics of phantom pain have been described to occur in quick and sudden attacks of pain shooting up and down the amputated limb as well as cases of constant, excruciating pain whilst intensely perceiving the amputated limb to be cramped or postured abnormally (Katz, 1992). Approximately eighty percent of amputees report suffering from or at least experiencing some level of phantom pain post amputation; therefore it is a prominent issue (Flor, Nikolajsen & Jensen, 2006). Phantom pain is neuropathic pain that has no individual trigger but instead a plethora of psychobiological aspects of neuroplasticity that contribute to the cause of phantom pain (Grusser, Diers & Flor, 2003). The following will: outline the role of the peripheral and central factors associated with phantom pain and discuss the cortical reorganisation of the somatosensory cortex in relation to phantom pain.
Carr mentions the affect that technology has on the neurological processes of the brain. Plasticity is described as the brains response through neurological pathways through experiences. The brain regions “change with experience, circumstance, and need” (29). Brain plasticity also responds to experiences that cause damage to the nervous system. Carr explains that injuries in accidents “reveal how extensively the brain can reorganize itself” (29).I have heard stories in which amputees are said to have a reaction to their amputated limb; it is known as a phantom limb. These types of studies are instrumental in supporting the claim that the brain can be restructured. Carr asserts that the internet is restructuring our brains while citing the brain plasticity experiments and studies done by other scientists. I have experienced this because I feel like by brain has become accustomed to activities that I do on a regular basis. For example, I rarely realize that I am driving when coming to school because I am used to driving on a specific route.
The brain has four major lobes. The frontal lobe, the parietal lobe, the occipital lobe, and temporal lobe are responsible for all of the activities of the body, from seeing, hearing, tasting, to touching, moving, and even memory. After many years of debating, scientist presents what they called the localization issue, Garret explains how Fritsch and Hitzig studied dog with conforming observations, but the cases of Phineas Gage’s accident in 1848 and Paul Broca’s autopsy of a man brain in 1861 really grabbed the attention of an enthusiastic scientific community (Garret 2015 p.6)
Increasing amount of research in recent years has added to developing knowledge of phantom limb pain (PLP). In this research proposal I aim to test the mirror therapy as an effective treatment in PLP. Phantom limb pain occurs in at least 90% of limb amputees. PLP may be stimulated by disconnection between visual feedback and proprioceptive representations of the amputated limb. Therefore, I will research both the neurobiology behind this phenomenon and whether illusions and/or imagery of movement of the amputated limb (mirror therapy) is effective in alleviating PLP of lower limbs. Mirror therapy has been used with noted success in patients who have had upper body amputation, but has not been determined in lower limb amputations. I would like to identify if form of treatment is equally effective in lower limb amputations. Yet, to consider mirror therapy as an effective means of treatment, one must understand PLP in its entirety. The main concern being if a limb is no longer attached to the body, how can neurons in the limb transport signals to the nervous system in order for the body to detect sensations? The biological significance of this project is to determine what occurs on the sensory level to cause PLP. Once that is discovered we can address whether or not mirror therapy is a plausible form of treatment.
Scientists are on the brink of doing the unthinkable-replenishing the brains of people who have suffered strokes or head injuries to make them whole again. If that is not astonishing enough, they think they may be able to reverse paralysis. The door is at last open to lifting the terrifying sentence these disorders still decree-loss of physical function, cognitive skills, memory, and personality.
Small, S., Buccino, G., & Solodkin, A. (2012). The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke. Developmental Psychobiology, 54(3), 293-310
Physicalism is the position that nothing can exceed past what is physically present, and what is physical is all that there can be. This idea is reductive in that it suggests there is no more to the universe than physical matters, including brain processes, sensations, and human consciousness. J.J.C. Smart explains sensations as a means of commentary on a brain process. He believes that, essentially, brain processes and what we report as sensations are essentially the same thing in that one is an account of the other. He writes in “Sensations and Brain Processes” that “…in so far as a sensation statement is a report of something, that something is in fact a brain process. Sensations are nothing over and above brain processes,” (145). Though
Nowadays, it is widely known that the right and left hemisphere have different functions. The two hemispheres are equally important in a daily life basis. Nevertheless, in the 1960’s this was not common knowledge. Even though today the importance of the brain hemispheres is common knowledge, people don’t usually know to whom attribute this findings. One of the people who contributed to form a more defined picture about the brain hemispheres and their respective functions was Roger Wolcott Sperry, with the split brain research. Roger Sperry did more contributions than the split brain research, but this is his most important and revolutionary research in the psychological field. Thanks to the split brain research, Sperry proved that the two hemispheres of the brain are important, they work together and whatever side of the brain is more capable of doing the task is the hemisphere that takes the lead.
This paper aims to endorse physicalism over dualism by means of Smart’s concept of identity theory. Smart’s article Sensations and the Brain provides a strong argument for identity theory and accounts for many of it primary objections. Here I plan to first discuss the main arguments for physicalism over dualism, then more specific arguments for identity theory, and finish with further criticisms of identity theory.
Kandel, E. R., J. H. Schwarz, and T. M. Jessel. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. Elsevier. New York: 1991.
Roger Sperry is one of the big Neurobiologists in the 1950’s. Sperry studied the relationship of the right and left hemispheres of the brain. In one of his experiments he flashed the word “Fork” in front of the patient. If the patient was asked to say the word he could not but if asked to right the word he would start to right the word “Fork”. This happed when the two brain hemispheres were disconnected from each other. At an another experiment he placed a toothbrush in the patients left hand and blind folded the patient and was asked to identify it they could not do it. But if placed in the right hand the patient would know right away what it was. That is just one of the types of study he did in his time.
R. L. Paul, M. M. (1972). The Species of the Brain Research, 1-19. pp. 113-117. S. A. Clark, T. A.
...owell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Mapping changes in the human cortex
This paper involves how the brain and neurons works. The target is to display the brain and neurons behavior by sending signals. The nervous system that sends it like a text message. This becomes clear on how we exam in the brain. The techniques show how the brain create in order for the nerves about 100 billion cells. Neurons in the brain may be the only fractions of an inch in length. How powerful the brain could be while controlling everything around in. When it’s sending it signals to different places, and the neurons have three types: afferent neurons, efferent neurons, and the interneurons. In humans we see the old part of emotions which we create memories plus our brain controls heart beating, and breathing. The cortex helps us do outside of the brain touch, feel, smell, and see. It’s also our human thinking cap which we plan our day or when we have to do something that particular day. Our neurons are like pin head. It’s important that we know how our brain and neurons play a big part in our body. There the one’s that control our motions, the way we see things. Each neuron has a job to communicate with other neurons by the brain working network among each cell. Neurons are almost like a forest where they sending chemical signals. Neurons link up but they don’t actually touch each other. The synapses separates there branches. They released 50 different neurons.
Tree Bark skin, Werewolf syndrome, Stone Man’s disease, Gastroschisis are some of the world’s strangest medical conditions. These medical conditions range from having skin that looks like bark, to organs growing on the outside of one’s body. Rare medial conditions are not well known throughout the world because they are not common; therefore, they are not seen on a daily basis. One of the most uncommon medical conditions is the Alien Hand Syndrome. Alien Hand Syndrome is where either of an individuals’ hand has a mind of its own. His/her hand does as it pleases. Sometimes the hand “…can punch or even attempt to strangle its owner” (Scherer). There were numerous theories that attempted to explain the origins of the disorder, such as real aliens, but this is not caused by extraterrestrials. Instead, Alien Hand Syndrome is actually caused from various types of brain injuries or medical disorders. Strokes, tumors, or botched brain surgery can severely damage the functionality of the brain resulting in Alien Hand Syndrome amongst other disorders. What most people do not know about Alien Hand Syndrome is when this syndrome was first discovered, how the hand has a mind of its own, and different experiences patients have had.