Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ecuador oil dependence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ecuador oil dependence
Ecuador is a third world developing country in the northwestern area of South America. Ecuador’s current president is Rafael Correa and although the country is democratic he has been imposing some socialist ideals. He was elected president in 2007 and then reelected in 2013, although some have suspicions of corruption in the voting system. One of his first actions as President was to publish a presidential mandate to create the Truth Commission in order “to prevent impunity” and investigate the human rights violations that occurred between the year 1984 and 1988 (Correa 1). This gave Correa a great image as a president following the constitution of the Republic as it stated, “Article 23, paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Republic prohibits …show more content…
Ecuador had chosen to use the transitional justice mechanism of truth commissions in the past to clarify the serious human rights violations. The first Truth and Justice Commission “was established on September 17, 1996 by President Abdala Bucaram through Ministerial Resolution No. 012” (Transitional Justice Research Colaberative). Within three months into the investigation there were 300 cases reported but, unfortunately, this truth commission only lasted five months before it terminated its operation(United States Institute of Peace). This left the victims without justice and in a way consolidated the impunity around the hundreds of cases that were reported without action and remained …show more content…
Some of the violations included the territory being exploited by using it for deforestation and polluting the river and waters by the foreign investors (Sin la Verdad no hay Justicia 29). The foreign investors, that were not named, invaded the communal lands and harassed the native tribes during oil exploration work (Sin la Verdad no hay Justicia 29). Despite Cordero’s economic plan, Ecuador’s “external debt increased 45% from 1984-1988” and brought the country into further oppression (Sin la Verdad no hay Justicia 30). Besides the violations that occurred to the land and natives in the Amazonia, Cordero also was violent toward the left wing opposing part by trying to control the other operations of the government that went beyond his authorized power. Cordero tried to eliminate the opposition and “disqualify representatives by falsely accusing them of harboring terrorist and drug dealers” that would make them unpopular with voters (Sin la Verdad no hay Justicia 30). Cordero tried to extend his power as President by taking control over the “Official Registry in which one has the power to decide what laws would be published and which ones would not be” and that would make be able to push his agenda (Sin la Verdad no hay Justicia
... laws governing the activities of foreign states in its EEZ. Ecuador’s blatant violation demonstrates their lack of respect for UN law. Donald Thomas was simply conducting his business to preserve his quality of life and his rights were infringed upon. To allow this case to go unresolved endangers the livelihood of many more fishermen. Ruling in favor of Ecuador would set a precedent that has far-reaching consequences: Exclusive Economic Zones are territorial waters. As a result, rights would be granted to States in their territorial waters that were not intended to be by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The violence exhibited by the Ecuadorian navy shows a lack of restraint parallel to the actions of rogue nations. The United States continues to insist that Ecuador did not meet the customary international standard in handling this situation.
On October 23, 2016 I went to a concert type of event that different music groups were performing. This event is what Hispanics call a “Jaripeo Baile,” which is a place that people can see other people bull riding like in the rodeo, but this event was only about music groups performing. One of the music groups that performed was a band called “Josecito Leon y Su Internacional Banda Roja.” While I watched the band’s performance it reminded me of how it relates to the themes that were from our readings and discussions that we had throughout the semester.
Throughout the ages, there have been many dictators, all cruel and unforgiving, including Paraguay’s dictator, Jose Gaspar Rodriguez de Francia, who singlehandedly was able to isolate the country from the rest of the world. This all started with the ending of the Paraguay’s revolutionary war, where Dr. Francia manipulated the newly formed government behind the scenes. The question is, during his dictatorship, did he do more good than harm? Even if originally Dr. Francia had good intentions, did he ended up to becoming a dictator who isolated Paraguay from the rest of the world? This research paper, will explain both sides of the argument to create a strong case to prove. Dr. Francia negatively affected Paraguay and did he do more harm than
...he lower class had their agenda on mind, and even disrupted the campaign of Allende in order to do so. Allende was then forced to deal with situations he should never have had to, thus hurting his political status with the working class because he could never deliver the results they wanted all the time.
In the beginning, Rafael Trujillo was a fruitful and beneficial leader to the country of the Dominican Republic. Trujillo reduced foreign debt and made the country more profitable, mainly because he was an excellent business man. However with this new prosperity, came the loss of the citizen's political liberties (1 “Rafael Trujillo”). Rafael Trujillo may have made the country more profitable, but he still was getting away with taking away innocent citizen’s political liberties.
Salvador Allende promised to redistribute Chile's income (only two percent of the population received forty-six percent of the income), nationalize major industries (especially the copper companies), and to expand relations with socialist and communist countries. Allende's presidency presented a threat to the United States; a man with such aspirations would have to stray from United States policies and the policies of all other countries. Allende would neither respect nor consider the work the United States had done for them in the past. The United States would no longer be able to act as a parasite, sucking the money out of Chile. The U.S. decided it must stop this man from rising to power as soon as possible.
After gaining independence, Latin American countries had difficulty in how to govern the newly instated states. In the chaos, people took advantage of this and instated themselves as dictators. They had simply took the position from the Spanish that they tried to vanquish (class notes). The power structure remained and the people who fought for independence were largely ignored and continuously oppressed. These dictatorships had remained in power until very recently. Paraguay was finally freed from the dictatorship in 1989 (Chapter
However, this does not necessarily mean colonizing Latin America, but rather having it allied and influenced by the United States' mentality and agenda. The book describes the tactics used by the United States to align these countries' policies and politics with its own. The book effectively portrays the role of the United States in the political affairs of Latin American countries. Higgins examines the Eisenhower administration's invasion of Guatemala, which resulted in a revolt to remove the leftist President Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán. The Arbenz administration posed a threat to the dominance of American companies in Guatemala, particularly the United Fruit Company.
There have been many humanitarians that strive to help countries suffering with human right abuses. People think that the help from IGOs and NGOs will be enough to stop human rights violations. However, it hasn’t been effective. Every day, more and more human rights violations happen. The problem is escalating. People, including children, are still being forced to work to death, innocent civilians are still suffering the consequences of war, and families are struggling to stay firm together. Despite the efforts from the people, IGOs, and NGOs, In the year 2100, human rights abuse will not end.
...2009): 8-9. United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review. Web. 8 Apr. 2014. .
Filmmaker Oliver Stone embarked on a journey across the Latin American continent pursuant to the filling of gaps left by mainstream media about the social and political movements in the southern continent. Through a series of interviews he conducted with Presidents Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Cristina Kirchner and former president Nėstor Kirchner of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Lula da Silva of Brazil, Rafael Correa of Ecuador and Raúl Castro of Cuba, Stone was able to compare firsthand information from the leaders themselves with that reported and published by the media (“Synopsis,” n.d.). It gives light to the measures these leaders had to take in order to initiate change in their respective countries, even if their public identities were at stake. Several instances in the film showed the mismatch between these two sources, pointing at the US government’s interests for greatly influencing the media for presenting biased, groundless views.
The paper traces Escobar's life from humble peasant beginnings to powerful cocaine drug dealer and kingpin. The paper discusses the sound financial decisions Escobar made as well as the way he invested in legitimate projects using the funds he gained illegally. The paper explores the influence Escobar had and the way he worked, ultimately unsuccessfully, to establish a no-extradition clause into the Colombian constitution.
Tanzi, Attila., Problems of Enforcement of Decisions of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the United Nations, EJIL, 6, (1995) 539-572.
Of course there is a challenge in implementing justice. Whether it’s a corrupt justice system, a fragile peace transition, large numbers of perpetrators or victims, and legal impediments such as amnesty laws. People can get justice through fair trials, truth seeking and fact finding, reparations, institutional reform, or memorialization. These mechanisms can be implemented by the national government, United Nations, international organizations or civil society. In order for these mechanisms to be successful they must be victim- centric, pragmatic, empowering, and work in the path of rebuilding trust relationships. Also, to emphasize the balance and for choosing the best strategy for justice, it is necessary to:
The Committee of Human Rights Violations offered people, who suffered gross human rights violations, a chance to tell the TRC their stories. It investigated gross human rights violations and found out how and why they happened. The committee investigated the human rights violations that happened between 1961 and 1994 and approximately 21000 statements were made and recorded. These hearings took place across South Africa from 1996-1998.