Racism and Stereotype in Karl Linder's Speech

1171 Words3 Pages

Racism is a fatal flaw in human society. Whole cultures could be eradicated or brought to the brink of destruction, such as when Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazi regime, brought on the Holocaust. In his efforts to bring the Jews to extinction he captured and imprisoned the Jews into concentration camps separated from the rest of society. Karl Linder in his efforts to keep the community of Clybourne Park “pure” for his growing family, attempts to assert dominance over the Stoller family (the Caucasian family moving away) and the Younger family (the African American family moving in), as if attempting to create a reverse concentration camp. He uses deceptive language, racial propaganda, and his position of power to influence the world around him. First, through underlining messages in his speech, Karl Linder expresses his concerns about the appearance of an African American family in a delicate form to the Stoller family. On page twenty-eight, Karl makes the comment that the Youngers are “one hundred percent [black].” And that in Hamilton Park (community the Youngers moved from) had some “unsavory characters” (Norris). This implies that the Youngers come from a criminal society, and as residence of the community must be similar in character. In comparison, Steve from Act Two uses jokes to down play his racial concerns, for example on page seventy-five Steve states that a African American man rapes a Caucasian man in a prison (Norris). After seeing their efforts futile, both Karl and Steve drop their acts and say what is on their minds, which causes chaos to ensue in both cases. In contrast to both of these characters are Bev and Lindsey in their respective acts. They play the voice of reason in both cases, but both their... ... middle of paper ... ... falling apart. After his failure he moves to Rosemont, which can be inferred from Kathy’s dialog on page sixty-one. This also reveals that Kathy is Karl’s and Betsy’s unborn child in Act One. Seeing as he was proven correct in his assumptions of the gentrification of Clybourne Park, a viewer can disagree with the way Karl handled the integration situation, but they cannot say it was unfounded. Works Cited Lahr, John. "Big Magic." The New Yorker 8 Mar. 2010: 78. Literature Resource Center. Web. 1 Apr. 2014. Norris, Bruce. Clybourne Park. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 2012. Print. Shay, Alison. "Remembering Hansberry versus Lee." Publishing the Long Civil Rights Movement. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, 12 Nov. 2012. Web. 20 Apr. 2014. Williamson, Kevin D. "Strictly Business." New Criterion 31.2 (2012): 38+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.

Open Document