Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History ch. 12 manifest destiny
Quizlet manifest destiny
Insight about Manifest Destiny
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Race and Manifest Destiny, Reginald Horsman surveys the origins and progression of Anglo-Saxon racial ideology and examines its consequences in American history. Primarily a history of ideas, the book sets the developments of ideologies of post American Revolution and expansion of newly founded America. Anglo-Saxon supremacy allowed for the suppression of other peoples in American history—it justified their enslavement, domination, exclusion, and extinction.
In the early 1840s John L. O’Sullivan, editor of the Democratic Review, spoke of the term Manifest Destiny to describe American expansion. O’Sullivan described the nation’s expansion as inevitable and criticized those that imposed on that process "for the avowed object of thwarting our
…show more content…
policy, limiting our greatness and checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions."(219) Horsman writes that even though O’Sullivan invented the term manifest destiny, the concept was rooted in Anglo-Saxon heritage.
To add on to their myth of superiority, Anglo-Saxons created another myth that claimed they were descendants of a great Aryan nation. Just as their descendants centuries later, the Aryan nation, spread its civilization across Europe, and by the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the English laid claim to a superb racial heritage. British colonists in American also sided to the great myths. Scientists, scholars, historians, philosophers, poets, and writers on both sides of the Atlantic supported these myths of racial greatness. The English supporters of a chosen race respected their institutions as proof of a nation’s greatness and showed how concepts of liberty, natural rights and popular sovereignty translated over to the colonies. In the process, in both in Britain and America, a transformation occurred whereby the English shifted praise from their political institutions as Anglo-Saxonism became racialized which ultimately led to the submission and oppression of Native Americans, Blacks, and Mexicans. Horsman adds on to the manner in which Anglo-Saxon and the Aryan nation myths influenced racial thinking in England, he examines the oddness of American life …show more content…
that gave proof to the chosen people concept. The success of the American Revolution added onto the American’s colonist’s devotion to freedom and just government. A sense of deep purpose and destiny spread through the Revolutionary generation, as they believed destined them for great things. During this period Americans believed in the Enlightenment ideas of equalism but interaction with black slavery and Native Americans gave way to new challenges to that view. In the late eighteenth century and the first part of the nineteenth century new ideas on racial thinking as well as close proximity and constant interaction with Indians and Blacks impacted American thinking on race. The confines of the new racial thinking justified how whites could treat and exploit certain groups and ultimately take control of some from their land, while others suffered extinction. As Americans thought in terms of empire, their thinking on the Native Americans and Africans changed and after 1815 a new racial theory evolved from all humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status to scientific theories of inferiority of such races such as Natives, Mexicans, and Africans. Between 1815 and 1850 there occurred a transformation in scientific racial thinking. By 1850 these theories provided a justification to push away or even the annihilation of inferior people. Science added to the American facts that differences between races were based on physical and mental factors of races. Furthermore, American writers and historians also had influenced racial thinking with their works, which supported and justified the oppression and conquering of inferior people that lived in the America. In addition, scientific writings concentrated on the physical differences among the races, American movement through the form of literature and arts concentrated on the special achievements of people, nations, and even the language a set of people used. The U.S. became an Anglo-Saxon republic that excluded nonwhites and used that argument to justify the annexation ethnic groups in areas they wanted control over for resources and expansion and to benefit economically from those areas inhabited with these inferior peoples who were incapable of democratic and structural governments. In addition with constant run ins with Natives and Africans, confrontation between Mexicans and Whites in the Texas Revolution, the Mexican War, and the Southwest resulted in Americans clearly designating themselves as an Anglo-Saxon Race. They clearly categorized Mexicans not only as an inferior people that could not make any use of the land they had but also stood as a barrier for the expansion of the “superior” white man. After the Mexican War Americans interpreted expansion in terms of economic expansion as well in order to compete in the world market. The new American Anglo Saxon ideology impacted American expansion. Racial belief sparked an expansion frenzy to capture the American Southwest, Mexico, Cuba and Central America. As the White man led the crusade for expansion, they believed that people that didn’t fit the criteria of what they considered superior were unfit for democratic and structural governments. While the nation’s foreign policy demanded economic insight of foreign markets, racism prohibited colonialism from happening as it posed as a threat to a homogenous people of that region. Historian Reginald Horsman looks at the development of racial ideology in the United States during the age of Andrew Jackson, The author argues that the idea of Anglo-Saxonism in the United States emerges out of England and the English reform and is influenced by Enlightenment ideas.
He shows how, in the decades after the American Revolution, Americans as well as European people developed ideas about the racial inferiority of other “lesser” peoples to justify the eventual cruel and unjust treatment of these groups. Horsman notes that while many Americans in the early years of the colonies agreed all humans are descended from one pair of people and the differences in skin color are due to differences in environment, climate, and geographical location, but this changes in the early nineteenth century. (Horsman 99-101) This is due to the influences of the Romantic Movement and its emphasis on the distinct traits and uniqueness of that individual as well as the existence of slavery at the time in a country that some referred to as the world’s freest nation. Finally, Horsman traces how the idea of racial inferiority begins to solidify and gains momentum throughout the mid nineteenth century and is used as justification for not only slavery but also Indian removal and the Mexican
War. Belief in racial destiny justified territorial expansion and suppression of “lesser” peoples. The belief in supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon paved the way for the furture supremacy of Anglo-Americans. This was the justification for the continued enslavement of Africans, the murder of Native American Indians, American expansion into Mexico, all of which justified a road of destruction and cruelty. By 1850, the American public and politicians believed that the Indians had an inevitable future of extinction due to their inferiority compared to the whites, and that the black population existed safely only because they were under the protection of their superior masters. The American expansion halted, in part, for the same reason it began—racial superiority dictated that the nation not be contaminated with the lesser races it had overcome. Instead, America would recreate the world in its image through economic expansion—not the acquisition of territory
Many Americans packed few belongings and headed west during the middle to the late nineteenth century. It was during this time period that the idea of manifest destiny became rooted in American customs and ideals. Manifest Destiny is the idea that supported and justified expansionist policies, it declared that expansion was both necessary and right. America’s expansionist attitudes were prominent during the debate over the territorial rights of the Oregon territory. America wanted to claim the Oregon territory as its own, but Great Britain would not allow that. Eventually the two nations came to an agreement and a compromise was reached, as seen in document B. The first major party of settlers that traveled to the west settled in Oregon.
The North is popularly considered the catalyst of the abolitionist movement in antebellum America and is often glorified in its struggle against slavery; however, a lesser-known installment of the Northern involvement during this era is one of its complicity in the development of a “science” of race that helped to rationalize and justify slavery and racism throughout America. The economic livelihood of the North was dependent on the fruits of slave labor and thus the North, albeit with some reluctance, inherently conceded to tolerate slavery and moreover embarked on a quest to sustain and legitimize the institution through scientific research. Racism began to progress significantly following the American Revolution after which Thomas Jefferson himself penned Notes on the State of Virginia, a document in which he voiced his philosophy on black inferiority, suggesting that not even the laws of nature could alter it. Subsequent to Jefferson’s notes, breakthroughs in phrenological and ethnological study became fundamental in bolstering and substantiating the apologue of racial inadequacy directed at blacks. Throughout history, slavery was indiscriminate of race and the prospect acquiring freedom not impossible; America, both North and South, became an exception to the perennial system virtually guaranteeing perpetual helotry for not only current slaves but also their progeny.
America’s Manifest Destiny first surfaced around the 1840’s, when John O’Sullivan first titled the ideals that America had recently gained on claiming the West as their ‘Manifest Destiny.’ Americans wanted to settle in the West for multiple reasons, from the idea that God wanted them to settle all the way to the West co...
In Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State Virginia, Query 14 & 18 Jefferson uses the literary technique of compare and contrast as well as rhetorical questions to describe how white people are far more superior to slaves. However, by minimizing the validity of the African peoples beauty and way of life he only shows himself to be ignorant and insecure.As a result, Thomas Jefferson's Query 14 & 18 showcases the psychological disabilities that comes with “whiteness”.
people of different ethnicities. Such harm is observed in the history of North America when the Europeans were establishing settlements on the North American continent. Because of European expansion on the North American continent, the first nations already established on the continent were forced to leave their homes by the Europeans, violating the rights and freedoms of the first nations and targeting them with discrimination; furthermore, in the history of the United States of America, dark skinned individuals were used as slaves for manual labour and were stripped of their rights and freedoms by the Americans because of the racist attitudes that were present in America. Although racist and prejudice attitudes have weakened over the decades, they persist in modern societies. To examine a modern perspective of prejudice and racism, Wayson Choy’s “I’m a Banana and Proud of it” and Drew Hayden Taylor’s “Pretty Like a White Boy: The Adventures of a Blue-Eye Ojibway” both address the issues of prejudice and racism; however, the authors extend each others thoughts about the issues because of their different definitions, perspectives, experiences and realities.
Behind the scenes of Manifest Destiny, what really transformed the country was the ability to move products across great distances and the Erie Canal was a huge turning point for economic growth in America. Opened in 1825, the Erie Canal was the engineering breakthrough of the nineteenth century: Its four waterways would connect manufacturing and eastern ports with the rest of the country. Farmers could now ship their goods, they could move out, come down the Hudson River and this way of commuting became a part of a global economy. This Moment would bring about the thought of expansion which will become the fuse to enormous economic growth that will ultimately in the next century, become the belief of manifest destiny. The nation that both reflected the pride which reflected American nationalism, and the idealistic image of social perfection through God and the Church caused the nation to separate.
Reginald Horsman’s Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism explores the evidence and reasons for racial prejudices in America and discusses one of the most controversial topics in American history. The book also navigates the subjects of white superiority, and the creation of Anglo-Saxonism. Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States was destined to expand from the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific Ocean; it has also been used to advocate for or justify other territorial acquisitions. Advocates of Manifest Destiny believed that expansion was not only good, but that it was obvious and certain. Originally a political catch phrase of the 19th century, "Manifest Destiny" eventually became a standard historical term, often used as a synonym for the expansion of the United States across the North American continent.
In Chapter 8 of Major Problems in American Immigration History, the topic of focus shifts from the United States proper to the expansion and creation of the so called American Empire of the late Nineteenth Century. Unlike other contemporary colonial powers, such as Britain and France, expansion beyond the coast to foreign lands was met with mixed responses. While some argued it to be a mere continuation of Manifest Destiny, others saw it as hypocritical of the democratic spirit which had come to the United States. Whatever their reasons, as United States foreign policy shifted in the direction of direct control and acquisition, it brought forth the issue of the native inhabitants of the lands which they owned and their place in American society. Despite its long history of creating states from acquired territory, the United States had no such plans for its colonies, effectively barring its native subjects from citizenship. Chapter 8’s discussion of Colonialism and Migration reveals that this new class of American, the native, was never to be the equal of its ruler, nor would they, in neither physical nor ideological terms, join in the union of states.
During the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the United States saw many problems come and go. Some problems were more important than others, however all led to further division of American politics. The most divisive issue in American politics during this time frame was the idea of Manifest Destiny, or territorial expansion.
John L. O’Sullivan, an editor, coined the term “Manifest Destiny” and gave the expansionist movement its name in 1845. The “Manifest Destiny” was the belief that Americans had the divine right to occupy North America. The Americans believed they were culturally and racially superior over other nations and other races such as the Native American Indians and Mexicans. The notion of the ‘Manifest Destiny’ was that the Americans were morally superior and therefore morally obligated to try to spread enlighten and civilization to the less civilized societies. According to World History Group, “The closest America came to making ‘Manifest Destiny’ an official policy was The Monroe Doctrine, adopted in 1823, it put European nations on notice that the U.S. would defend other nations of the Western Hemisphere from further colonization” (World History, 2015). This divine American mission caused Anglo-Saxon Americans to believe they had the natural right to move west and bring blessings of self-government and religion, more specifically-
The Untied States of America was built on the exploitation of others and the expansion of foreign lands. Anglo-Saxon superiority and their successive impact on governing policies and strong domination throughout every social institution in the nation allowed discrimination to prevail. Scientific Racism reached new heights of justification towards slavery, the massive eradication of the Native people, colonialism and daily occurrences of unequal behaviors and treatments towards colored people. The strong presence of polygenesis helped spur along and justify racism; the idea that all non whites were groups of individuals who ultimately came from another type of species supporting the idea that Blacks, Natives and other colored people were not ‘real’ human beings. Traditions, legislation, domination and acceptance of such social norms allow racism to be principal whether it was apparent through slavery or hidden in new laws and policies to come. Every aspect of a colored person’s life was affected upon, Education, economic status, environmental location and political rights. Those who had the power within the court system followed the Anglo-Saxon ways, making any change difficult and time consuming to come across.
The Manifest Destiny was a progressive movement starting in the 1840's. John O'Sullivan, a democratic leader, named the movement in 1845. Manifest Destiny meant that westward expansion was America's destiny. The land that was added to the U.S. after 1840 (the start of Manifest Destiny) includes The Texas Annexation (1845), The Oregon Country (1846), The Mexican Cession (1848), The Gadsden Purchase (1853), Alaska (1867), and Hawaii (1898). Although this movement would take several years to complete, things started changing before we knew it.
Manifest Destiny, before becoming nationally known, started very meagerly. The term "Manifest Destiny" was first used by Congressman Robert Winthrop before being made popular by John L. O'Sullivan in 1845 (Manifest Destiny). O'Sullivan first used the term, "Manifest Destiny" in an article he wrote for the Democratic Review in the July-August edition of 1845. O'Sullivan wrote to other nations who had, "the avowed object of thwarting our policy and hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the Continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions" (Adams 332). He was actually talking about the annexation of Texas but the term was stolen from him and used by expansionists of the time to justify other annexations (Adams 332).
The idea that the category of one’s property extends to and includes indentured servants and/or slaves was a popular, widespread belief in colonial times. Personal identity and most, if not all, human rights were stripped at the hands of one’s “owner,” as they were no longer a person of their own free will but an object belonging to someone of a perceived “higher standing.” However, while conditions for indentured servants and slaves hold many similarities, there were also distinct differences pertaining to skin color. In Michael P. Johnson’s Reading the American Past, documents 1-4: “Aristotle on Masters and Slaves,” 5-1: “Elizabeth Ashbridge Becomes an Indentured Servant in New York,” and 5-4: “Advertisements for Runaway Slaves,” all highlight
"My beloved brethren:—The Indians of North and of South America—the Greeks—the Irish, subjected under the king of Great Britain—the Jews, that ancient people of the lord—the inhabitants of the islands of the sea—in fine, all the inhabitants of the earth, (except however, the sons of Africa) are called men, and of course are, and ought to be free." (Walker 267). A civil rights activist, David Walker, wrote these words one-hundred and eighty-five years ago, in his essay called Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World. During this time abolitionists were trying to stop the addition of more slave states as part of the Missouri compromise (Shi and Mayer 267). This is a powerful message—a call to all of the people in the world. That is why documents like this are so important when looking at history. The literature and propaganda of a period (primary source documents) can give us a glimpse into the minds of those who lived before us. Major conflicts between the settlers and Indians would shape the course of the nation (Richter 41). That is why the key to understanding early American history, from settlement to 1840, is Native American and European contact, and the literature and propaganda that surrounded them.