Comparing Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part Two

675 Words2 Pages

The writing "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2," by Roger Ebert and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2: An Action-Packed Curtain Call," by Andrew O'Hehir were writings based on each author's opinion on "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2" movie. From Roger Ebert's point of view on the movie he writes about how part 2, and the finale of this movie served as an appropriate finale reaching back to seven previous films. He talks about the characters Harry, Hermoine, and Ron growing up into more mature adult characters. The movie was like a reunion for all characters basically. He began to question the setting of the movie whether if it was really set in Britain or, either somewhere else with the exception of british actors. The movie is just based on magical romanticism where one magical creature fights for the power of another. …show more content…

So it should be. That makes it particularly inappropriate for the additional dimness of 3-D,". Andrew O'Hehir's writing, and point of view of 'harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2" was more accurate from someone who had an oppossing dissatisfaction about the movie. he described it as an Epic Fantasy, that has no beginning an no middle, but with an two-plus hours of thundering, momentousendings. O'Hehir provides many references, like Edmund Wilson, one of the twentith century's greatest cultural critics. He talks about the movie basically being a grave and violent picture built around the large-scale destruction of Hogwarts, Harry Potter's beloved alma mater and the conclusion of a final confrontation between Harry between Harry (Radcliffe) and the reptile-headed Dark Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), who are linked to each other in ways they don't quite

More about Comparing Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part Two

Open Document