Goblet Of Fire Analysis

911 Words2 Pages

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
You're a champion, Harry

Before the first Harry Potter film came out in 2001, many fans were worried that the unusual and distinctively English charms of JK Rowling's books would be lost in the journey from printed page to the big screen.
Ever since Christopher Columbus vacated the director's seat, the film adaptations have been getting progressively sharper and more fascinating. The latest even features Jarvis Cocker and members of Radiohead vamping it up as the Weird Sisters at a school ball.
The Goblet of Fire is also the first Harry Potter film to be directed by an Englishman, Mike Newell, best known for Four Weddings and a Funeral and Donnie Brasco. Like his predecessor Alfonso Cuarón, he has little time for anything sappy or sugary. "Dark and difficult times lie ahead" is one of the things that …show more content…

He grunts, swigs from small flasks of booze in order to insulate himself from demons, and takes Harry under his wing, a place that turns out to be less safe than the schoolboy imagines. For much of the film it seems that he's going to be another Hagrid - a growler who turns out to be a softie - but when the secret of his identity does emerge, it's more foul than most audiences new to the story will expect.

That in the end is the true measure of The Goblet of Fire. For all its dull moments - and, at more than 150 minutes, there are quite a few stretches when it feels as we're merely biding time until another ugly episode - it isn't the kind of film that will appeal only to fans of the book. Of course, it should have featured a lot more of the deliciously serpentine Alan Rickman, and it should certainly have given much more screen time to Jarvis Cocker; he is, after all, the patron saint of exactly the same kind of misfits, outsiders and misshapes represented by Potter

Open Document