Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social perspective on abortion
Social perspective on abortion
Society's view on abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social perspective on abortion
Precedent
In the case of Crown v Bayliss and Cullen in 1986; two doctors were charged under section 224 of the Queensland Criminal Code Act, as it was seen as an unlawful abortion. Consequently, an abortion is considered lawful in Queensland if carried out to prevent serious danger to the woman’s physical and mental health from the continuance of the pregnancy. The court sought to use this case as a way to clarify the confusion on the matter of abortions, and a person's ability to receive one in ill health or perceived ill health, as well as the responsibility of the doctor and patient in the situation. (R v Bayliss and Cullen, 1986)
Case Law In the case of R v Wald, in 1971 in the NSW District
…show more content…
On average only 4% of those surveyed are opposed to abortion, the majority of them being a few religious groups and people over the age of 75. (Betts, 2009)
Moral and Ethical Debate
The abortion debate questions whether it is or isn’t morally right to terminate a pregnancy before childbirth. (BBC, 2014)There are always people who will agree and disagree, while some people will agree on it if it is the mother's life at risk. There are others who believe there is a range of circumstances in which abortion is morally acceptable. (BBC,2014)
There are those who believe a foetus’ right to life before its initial developmental stages has the power to override the right a woman has to her body, without considering the difficulties it can bring, as well as the psychological damage it can leave the mother with. As well as a mother who rejects the child due to the circumstances of its conception. In the circumstances of rape, incest or sexual coercion there should be leeway, where others believe that no matter the circumstance a mother should not be allowed to terminate the fetus. (Shafer-Landau,
…show more content…
(BBC, 2014) While some religions have adopted a ‘pro-life’ stance towards abortion, while others have accepted ‘pro-choice’ stances with open arms. (Gov. SA, 2010)
Throughout history, women have had to fight for their rights, their right to vote, equal pay, and access to higher education, and now women have also had to fight for their reproductive rights, including access to contraception and access to safe, medical and surgical abortions. Pregnancy impacts greatly on women, and no matter what other, political, social or economic rights women have if they do not have control over their own bodies, it is meaningless to stand up for
Imagine…the birth of a human being into the world. 9 months of endless anticipation leading to someone’s first chance at seeing the world for the first time. While some enjoy the result of a pregnancy, leading to a new human being entering life, some are not so fond, or just can’t be in such a situation. Abortion is the supposed “cure” to this problem and is, for the most part, done safely. However, one of the factors stopping someone from committing an abortion is the consideration of moral status on the child.
In her essay, “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thompson outlines the most common arguments that people defend, and explains her views regarding each of these. She shares numerous examples and situations that she believes will support her views. One of her most prominent arguments is that of whether or not a fetus has moral standing as a “person.” She highlights the so called “battle” between an innocent life, the fetus, and the bodily rights of the mother. Within this argument, Judith outlines for us several situations which can provide people with a different outlook regarding abortion. Throughout Judith’s essay, she does not truly give a clear stance, but rather allows her readers to choose for themselves.
The birth of a child is usually a wonderful and priceless occasion. However, on June 5, 2015, an eleven-year-old girl gave birth to a newborn girl. Approximately a year before she gave birth, her 40-year-old father repeatedly sexually assaulted her. In this case, the unprepared eleven-year-old child decided to have the baby. This is a prime example that illustrates that the right to abortion should always be vested in the woman.
This essay examines and critiques Judith Jarvis Thomson’s, A Defense of Abortion (1971). Thomson sets out to show that the foetus does not have a right to the mother’s body and that it would not be unjust to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is not threatened. For the sake of the argument, Thomson adopts the conservative view that the foetus is a person from the moment of conception. The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life.
However, we have reverted back to the case of rape. If a fetus conceived voluntarily has the right not to be aborted due to how it was conceived, then the fetus conceived from rape should also have that same right. Instead of creating a distinction of cases where the fetus has a right to use the body of a pregnant person, Thomson instead makes a distinction of when abortion would be morally wrong.
Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.
There are many factors that are taken into consideration when determining if abortion is morally permissible, or wrong including; sentience of the fetus, the fetuses right to life, the difference between adult human beings and fetuses, the autonomy of the pregnant woman, and the legality of abortion. Don Marquis argues that abortion is always morally wrong, excluding cases in which the woman is threatened by pregnancy, or abortion after rape, because fetuses have a valuable future. Mary Anne Warren contends that late term abortions are morally permissible because birth is the most significant event for a fetus, and a woman’s autonomy should never be suspended.
In her essay “Abortion, Intimacy, and the Duty to Gestate,” Margaret Olivia Little examines whether it should be permissible for the state to force the intimacy of gestation on a woman against her consent. Little concludes that “mandating gestation against a woman’s consent is itself a harm - a liberty harm” (p. 303). She reaches this conclusion after examining the deficiencies in the current methods used to examine and evaluate the issues of abortion. Their focus on the definition of a “person” and the point in time when the fetus becomes a distinct person entitled to the benefits and protections of the law fails to capture “the subtleties and ambivalences that suffuse the issue” (p. 295). Public debate on the right to life and the right to choose has largely ignored the nature of the relationship between the mother and the fetus through the gestational period and a woman’s right to either accept or decline participation in this relationship.
Nearly one in three women will have had at least one abortion by menopause, and 61 percent of women who have abortions are already mothers. An abortion is the act of removing a human embryo or fetus from the uterus of a pregnant woman prior to the completion of the full term of pregnancy. The two sides, pro-choice and pro-life, disagree on whether or not abortions should be legal. Pro-choice people are in favor of abortions when desired by the mother, and allow the mother to make all decisions regarding the pregnancy. In contrast, pro-life people believe abortions should be outlawed, and some within this category suppose abortion could be an option under certain circumstances, such as rape or health risk to the mother. Currently, abortions are legal before 24 weeks into the pregnancy at the mother’s request. Abortion should be legal in the first two trimesters, and allowed when health risks are present in the third trimester because supporting a pro-life stance
Those who adamantly oppose abortion are regarded as pro-life and those who are supporters of abortion are considered pro-choice by contemporary standards. Even among those who advocate abortion, there are discrepancies in their views such as up until what point in the pregnancy is abortion morally permissible. In my opinion, abortion is morally permissible at any stage in a woman’s pregnancy. This is ethically acceptable because a woman should have the right to control what goes on within her body. Along with this, fetuses are still far from personhood (having the qualities of a human being); therefore, we cannot liken abortion to any variety of murderous activity.
Abortion may appear ethical or unethical depending on various viewpoints and circumstances. The fetus is considered a person and bringing it to term may be unethical as the act is considered as murder. In some situations, the mother may require to terminate a pregnancy for her bodily autonomy (Johnston, 2003). In such positions, the resolution to terminate a pregnancy may be argued as the most ethical choice. The mother is also considered to having a reasonable level of ethical responsibility to the fetus, because she did not take enough precaution to ensure avoiding conception (Cline, 2014). The mother’s ethical responsibility to the fetus may not be enough to deprive her choice of abortion; it...
Abortion has been accepted by the United States of America ever since the monumental Roe vs. Wade case in the early 1970’s, but is still a very controversial issue. Many people are for and against abortions. Some people say that the child inside its mother’s womb deserves the opportunity to live, while others believe that a mother has the right to choose whether or not her fetus can live or die. Other advocates for abortion claim that abortion helps keep the threat of overpopulation down. They also say that in many extreme cases, it is in the best interest of the mother and the child that the fetus be aborted. Abortion helps keep the crime rate low, so it should remain legal, they also say.
Abortion has been one of the most talked about topics in society just about anywhere from television, magazines, whether or not it should be the right or wrong thing to do. Abortion is a very sensitive issue to discuss, because of its nature. Many people have said that abortion is a very bad thing to do and it should not even be choice whether or not to abort a living fetus. People think that abortion is committing murder as it is killing the human fetus. However, others feel that a woman should have a voice and have the right to choose to keep the child or not and that it is not murder until the baby is born. Majority of individuals who believe that abortion is bad say that the fetus is human who is partly being formed and to have an abortion is considered to be murder. For the people who think an abortion is ok, say that it’s not considered murder unless the child is born. I believe that abortion should be seen in which the stage the fetus is in. if the fetus is in an early stage of pregnancy it is not considered murder, but if the fetus has already began to develop into a larger fetus then it is indeed considered to be murder. There are times when abortion can be accepted, if the mother is having complications due to pregnancy. For example if the mother is enduring complications in her pregnancy that can harm her, because of the child in that case it is ok to perform an abortion to help save the mother’s life. It is also very important to understand this type of situation. The mother has the right to have an abortion and it is her decision because a mother knows best about her health conditions.
Since the inauguration of President Trump, many women have had concerns about their ability to effectively voice their opinions. They have also had fears of losing certain rights altogether, including the right to contraceptives that a plethora of the women in our population heavily rely on. While these fears are fairly new in our time and age, women had bigger problems in the past. We are not the first generation of women who have had to fight for what they believe naturally belongs to them.
Abortions have always been a very controversial topic. Over the years we continue to fight for or against it. One can say that is one of the most talked and argued topic in the United States. An abortion is when a woman terminates her pregnancy before the fetus is viable using various of methods. Some argue that abortions should be illegal and considered murder, while others, from a religious point of view, say that no one has the right to take away the life of a person, in this case the fetus. However, others insist, that abortions are a basic women’s right.