Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The drama of Shakespeare
The drama of Shakespeare
The drama of Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1587 Philip the II of Spain lost his patience with Queen Elizabeth after Elizabeth killed off Mary Queen of Scots, causing Phillip to arrange an invasion of England. Queen Elizabeth anticipated this and gathered her troops in Tilbury, where she presented a speech to inspire her troops to repel the Spanish Armada. Because Queen Elizabeth’s use of diction, figurative language, and appeals, the queen manages create a patriotic tone and rouse her troops to prevent the invasion of England.
Initially, Queen Elizabeth utilizes diction to unify herself with her troops and her kingdom. “I myself will take up arms, I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder of every one of your virtues in the field.” By including herself with her troops, Elizabeth emanates a positive feel therefore convincing the troops that it could be an effortless win. Additionally, the queen reassures her kingdom that she will reward them when the war was over, “... you have deserved rewards and crowns; and we do assure you in the word of a
…show more content…
prince, they shall be duly paid to you.” which gives her people a reason to fight for. In like manner the phrase, “I myself will take up arms,” contributes to her argument because it proves that if women were willing to fight so should men. At the time women were expected to acquire the role of a housewife, so when Queen Elizabeth promotes the idea of women wanting to fight it pushes men to prove their masculinity. In Addition the queen made use of certain words like “my loving people” and “my faithful and loving people” to express her appreciation of the kingdom and hopes of unification for the anticipated war. Equally as important as diction, the queen practices figurative language, such as anaphora and juxtaposition, to prove herself to her people and emphasize her desire for unification in her kingdom. When the queen uses the repetition of the words “by your” she implies that the outcome of the war depends on the troops’ collaboration with her general. “...not doubting but by your obedience to my general, by your concord in the camp, and your valour in the field, we shall shortly have a famous victory over those enemies of my God..” Additionally, Elizabeth repeats the pronoun “my” to demonstrate how she’s willing to die amongst her kingdom. “... to live and die amongst you all; to lay down for my God, and for my kingdom, and my people, my honour and my blood even in the dust.” Queen Elizabeth juxtaposes her figure to that of a king’s strong heart and stomach to appeal to her patriotic view and offset the women stereotype at the time. “I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart and stomach of the king, and a king of England too…” Ultimately, Elizabeth uses ethos and pathos to produce a nationalist feel throughout her speech.
By doing so, Queen Elizabeth makes the soldiers feel protective of their country, therefore ensuring their loyalty in the upcoming war. “Let tyrants fear, I have always so behaved myself that…” Likewise the queen creates confidence and pride when she expresses her view of the war as an easy win. “... we shall shortly have a famous victories over those enemies of God” Another strategy that the queen utilizes is that she places her full trust on the people, eliminating any signs of distrust between her and her people. “... I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects…” As well as a patriotic mood, the queen gives herself credibility and shows her people that she is their monarch. “I myself will take up arms, I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder of every one of your virtues in the
field.” Queen Elizabeth’s speech to the troops at Tilbury turned out to be one of Queen Elizabeth’s most memorable speeches in her lifetime. Due to her amazingly organized and accurately worded speech, the Elizabeth managed to unify her troops even if they didn’t end up fighting a land war.
In “Queens, 1963”, the speaker narrates to her audience her observations that she has collected from living in her neighborhood located in Queens, New York in the midst of the Civil Rights Movement. The narrator is a thirteen-year-old female immigrant who moved from the Dominican Republic to America with her family. As she reflects on her past year of living in America, she reveals a superb understanding of the reasons why the people in her neighborhood act the way they do towards other neighbors. In “Queens, 1963” by Julia Alvarez, the poet utilizes diction, figurative language, and irony to effectively display to the readers that segregation is a strong part of the American melting pot.
Tatiana de Rosnay used different literary tools to assist her writing in order to deepen the story, including figurative language, dramatic irony, and foreshadowing. The use of figurative language helps to clarify a description in order to place an image in the mind of the reader. Similes are the main type of figurative language used throughout Sarah’s Key, allowing the reader to see what is happening. Many images conjured up make comparisons as a child would make them, as much of the story concerns the innocence of a child, such as “[t]he oversized radiators were black with dirt, as scaly as a reptile” (Rosnay 10) and “[t]he bathtub has claws” (Rosnay 11). Other descriptions compare Sarah, and Zoe, to a puppy, a symbol of innocence, as children are known to be
many times for the sake of Elizabeth, and the most important is that she chose
Queen Elizabeth skillfully used diction throughout her speech to motivate the troops. In the speech, Queen Elizabeth used the word “we” four times to underscore her feeling of unity between her and her country. She conveyed her care about the welfare of everyone in the country. This inspired the soldiers to remain patriotic and want to fight for their nation. In addition, the queen refered to the soldiers as “noble” and “worthy”, praising them with positive words. She intended to make the soldiers see that the task was significant, making them feel that they were important and want to protect the kingdom of Spain. Later in the sentence, Queen Elizabeth used the phrase “enemies of my God” in the conclusion of her speech. She used a powerful word to connect with the troops by juxtaposing her and their anger toward Spain, emboldening them to challenge the expected invaders. Queen Elizabeth’s impacting usage of diction gave the soldiers the will to fight, fulfilling the purpose of the speech.
In 1558, John Knox declared, “To promote a Woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any Realm, Nation, or City, is against all Nature…” (document 1). Knox’s statement was no different than most English men’s opinions during the 1500s. The majority of the population was opposed to having a women hold any type of political power, as they believed it was a job for solely a man to possess. Leading up to the time period of Queen Elizabeth I’s reign, females had a specific purpose in life: to serve their husbands and provide them with children. All women lacked freedom and liberty, Elizabeth Tudor sought to change this matter. When Queen Elizabeth was coronated in 1559, men were superior in all economic and social aspects; however,
This scene is an excellent example of Shakespeare’s skill at creating a sense of dualities throughout Hamlet. Several characters throughout the play are two (or even three!) faced, and the King belongs to this category.
The 1580’s resounded with rumors of a war between England and Spain. Under Queen Elizabeth I, England had managed to postpone it for several years, but as things came to a head in the Netherlands in 1588, war brewed. Spain’s King Phillip II had long desired England, even proposing to Elizabeth in an attempt to gain the English throne. As a very strong Catholic, King Phillip, as well as the rest of Spain, viewed Protestant England as a rebellious country, denying their faith. Backed by the Papacy, he decided to stage an invasion of England, and return a Catholic leader to its throne. England’s recent involvement in the Dutch rebellion gave him a perfect excuse for doing so. The coming war would display Spain’s power but mismanagement, exhibit England’s planning and technical advantage, and usher England into a new role as a world superpower.
...These characters all show traits of wittiness, determination and strength. The traits Queen Elizabeth expressed as she ruled England, a single woman taking on a man’s job. Shakespeare included these characters in his play because he knew the Queen would enjoy seeing characters that portrayed her; it showed a sign a respect towards her. The Queen supported the theatre and Shakespeare in his work. Shakespeare thanks her by giving her females characters leads in his play with characteristics of her reflected in them. Queen Elizabeth ruled throughout Shakespeare’s life so it would influence him in his writings. She showed him through her rulings that she was a feminist. She did whatever it took to get what she wanted and to rule her country, she showed fierceness and compassion. Shakespeare took these characteristics and portrayed them in his female characters.
Gender was the leading cause of distress in the 1500’s: King Henry VIII wanted nothing more than to have a son, yet was “cursed” with the legacy of a frail son, whom died before the age of 18 and two daughters, one of whom broke every convention of her gender. Queen Elizabeth I never married nor had children, yet can be considered one of England’s most successful monarchs. By choosing King James VI of Scotland as her heir, unbeknownst to her, she created the line that leads to the modern Queen of England, Elizabeth II. The question posed is then, how did Elizabeth I’s gender affect her rule?
Gender was the leading cause of distress in the 1500’s: King Henry VIII wanted nothing more than to have a son, yet was “cursed” with the legacy of a sickly son, whom died before the age of 18 and two daughters, one of whom broke every convention of her gender. Queen Elizabeth I never married nor had children, yet can be considered one of England’s most successful monarchs. By choosing King James VI of Scotland as her heir, unbeknownst to her, she created the line that leads to the modern Queen of England, Elizabeth II. The question posed is then, how did Elizabeth I’s gender affect her rule?
Queen Elizabeth I uses pathos to appeal to soldiers through their emotions by reminding them that she is on the field with them to die for her subjects (them), just as she is asking them to die for her. She is not on the battlefield with them for her own amusement; the Queen is determined to “live or die amongst you all, to lay down for my God, and for my kingdom” and this appeals to the soldiers’ sense of duty.
On the 14th of May 1264, the forces of Simon de Montfort, Gloucester and the Londoners were set arrayed against the loyalist forces of King Henry III, Richard of Cornwall and Prince Edward (later to become King Edward I). The loyalists suffered a massive defeat at this Battle of Lewes and among those captured, aside from Richard of Cornwall and perhaps the King (Prestwich indicates the unsure nature of the King's capture 46), were the northern barons (Scottish lords) of Balliol, Bruce and Comyn. (Jenks 132) Prince Edward also became a hostage as part of an exchange after the battle. These same men who fought together and were held captive by the de Montforts would war against each other thirty years later. King Edward I (whom will be referred to as Edward) was not set on instigating a war against Scotland, nor were any of these Scottish lords interested in battling against such a formidable opponent as England. So why did war occur if none of these men were initially motivated for war? A series of unfortunate, but potent events led to the chrysalis of war, which was then allowed to grow and fully develop into a war by the specific actions of individuals. This essay will attempt to draw attention to many of the events which gave rise to war and investigate the complex nature of the individuals who in the end caused war through their acts (intentional and non-intentional).
may not be all that he claims to be- the use of the word ‘My’ is very
Queen Elizabeth I’s gender appears as one of the main topics in her speeches. Elizabeth’s common mention of her own female gender, despite the fact that she could refer to herself with masculine terms, allows her to use gender stereotypes. Using these stereotypes along with mentions of motherly love and her knowledge of literature and when to manipulate her gender, she can rally others to her side, explain why she delays her answers to Parliament, and explain why she cannot knowingly harm her subjects, but by doing this, she provides people with evidence that women are unintelligent and incapable of ruling.
Queen Elizabeth the first was one of the first woman monarchs to rule alone in the history of Europe. Her character, the way she ruled, and even her gender transformed her country’s go...