Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research on trade between canada and U.S
Why should quebec be independent
Quebec separate from Canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research on trade between canada and U.S
One political issue however that Canada faces is the Quebec Referendum and the desire of some French Canadians living in Quebec for Quebec to become a sovereign and independent country. There have two recent referendum motions in Quebec, the first in 1980 and the second more recently in 1995 where the difference between voters electing to remain as part of Canada and those wanting an independent Quebec sovereign was very close (50.6% voted No and 49.4% voted Yes). The reason to separate is based on the language and cultural differences between French Canada and the rest of Canada which is predominantly English speaking. The issue here is that Quebec is the second most populous province in Canada and the largest province by area (“Quebec,” n.d.). Furthermore, Quebec has abundance of natural resources. It has about 30 mines where minerals such as gold, iron, and copper are extracted. It also has a large supply of fresh water including the Saint Lawrence …show more content…
river. It also has a strong economy. In fact, Quebec represents 20.4% of the total GDP of Canada (“Quebec,” n.d.). These factors are significant to Canada and there is a real risk that a Quebec referendum may destabilize the Canadian economy and the country as a whole. With regards to trade, Canada is currently the second largest trading partner for the U.S. with an estimated “$662.7 billion of goods and services in 2015, of which $337.3 billion were exports and $325.4 billion imports. U.S. exports to Canada account for 18.6% of overall U.S. exports in 2015” (“Canada | United States Trade Representative,” 2017). Thus, the U.S. and Canada have a very strong trading relation and are two of the biggest trading partners in the world. This trading relationship has been greatly facilitated by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which was established between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico in 1993 and removed many of the trade barriers between the three countries (“The World Factbook: Canada,” 2017). The effect of NAFTA on trade between the two countries has been significant, U.S. exports to Canada are up 179% from 1993 (pre-NAFTA) and U.S. imports from Canada are also up 165% dating back to the same time period (“Canada | United States Trade Representative,” 2017). One possible risk to the U.S. - Canada trading relationship is that the newly elected president of the United States, Donald Trump, has expressed his desire and willingness to renegotiate or even withdraw the U.S. from NAFTA. This will have a significant effect on trading between the two countries and the U.S. economy in general given that a significant portion of U.S. exports and imports are from Canada. Furthermore, the economies of the two countries are closely aligned and this drastic measure will affect Canada as well and not just the U.S. posing a significant risk to any U.S. company planning on exporting goods or services to Canada. Even though the renegotiation of NAFTA or the withdrawal of the U.S.
from this trade agreement is a significant risk, it is slightly offset as there is still a likelihood that the U.S. government would negotiate a new bilateral trading relationship with Canada directly. In fact, prior to NAFTA, there was already a free trade agreement between the two countries known as the Canada – United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) which was signed in 1988 (“The World Factbook: Canada,” 2017). The trading relationship between the two countries is simply significant and it is inconceivable that an adequate replacement, which would address the concerns and flaws of NAFTA, would not be found. Furthermore, President Trump has stated that some of his concerns with NAFTA include the migration of U.S. jobs and factories to Mexico, meaning that the trading relationship with Mexico is of a bigger concern and a renegotiation of NAFTA would affect the U.S. – Mexico relationship more than it would affect the U.S. – Canada
relationship. In summary, the political and legal system in Canada is very stable and favorable for a U.S. company to do business there. The country is well governed, with a strong legal system, and is safe and peaceful. There is also a very strong trading relationship between the two countries as they are two of the biggest trading partners in the world. Although there some risks relating to U.S. companies doing business in Canada, including the Quebec referendum and the renegotiation of NAFTA, however these risks are not believed to be significant as the infrastructure is there for U.S. companies to export and do business with their neighbors to the north.
As its own state Quebec would have the capacity to act, consolidate and further create their own cultural identity (Heard, 2013). For example, Quebec could foster the national language to be French. By gaining independence from Canada, Quebec can then create their own laws, own immigration rules and levy taxes (Heard, 2013). This would allow Quebec to be completely independent from the rest of Canada, but they would have connecting boarders like the United States and Canada do.
...ereignty. As mentioned Quebec does not have complete sovereignty and it shares its powers with the federal government (Johnson). Strong words like Johnson's found in the mass media are very significant to issues such as this. As elected representatives the government will not act against the wishes of the majority of citizens. Therefore if the Canadian citizens claim that Native Sovereignty in Canada can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty than it will not.
Quebec’s social identity and defining characteristics contradict and conflict with those of rest of Canada. Since the genesis of our country, the political, social disagreements, and tensions between Quebec and the rest of Canada have been unavoidable. Utilizing Hiller’s key contradictions in the analysis of a Canadian society, we will compare and contrast the nature of the societal identity in Quebec compared to that of rest of Canada, emphasising on the major differences and tensions between the province and the rest of the country.
Quebec is the largest Canadian province, with the second largest population and economy after that of Ontario. Historically, the province of Quebec presents a unique frontier for the analysis of Anglo-French relations. It is important to note that Canadian domain as a whole was principally an extension of France until the British forces led by Jeremy Amherst took hold o Montreal in 1760. The 1763 signing of the Treaty o Paris essentially sealed this acquisition of Canada by the Great Britain. The present federal structure of Canada came into being in 1867; a structure that created the office of the Prime Minister and promised considerable autonomy to the provinces. However, the relations of the French-speaking province of Quebec
What political consequences would have occurred if Quebec had voted "Yes" in the 1995 referendum?
separate. Quebec has been one of the provinces of Canada for a long period of
The fall of Quebec was a turning point in Canadian history, changing it from a French colony to a British colony. Had this battle gone the other way, English might be the second language, not French. The battle of Quebec was one of many battles during the 'Seven Year War'. They called it the Maritime War. It was officially declared in May 1756. Britain and Prussia were on one side and France, Spain, and Austria on the other. The war moved across the Atlantic Ocean from Europe because the French and the British were fighting over furs and land. Britain, while subsidizing and aiding Prussia, its only European ally, sought victory in America and sent what was for that century an overwhelming number of regular troops in order to stiffen the military of the American colonies.
Quebec has struggled with a need to be maitres chez nous “masters of their own house” (Young, 1998). Many attempts at resolving Quebec's issues has resulted in tensions from both sides. Because Quebec has a strong national identity, and do not define themselves as strictly Canadian, Quebec is seen as difficult, unyielding and discontented. Quebec's separation perhaps is inedible and the future of Canada questionable. Canada without Quebec will bring about many complications and whether there is a rest of Canada (ROC) after Quebec a major challenge. Western alienation and the lack of representation in federal affairs will be a factor; moreover, past actions and historical events may have turned Canada into a time bomb, and the deterioration of the provinces the only sulotion. How First Ministers react to Quebec's sovereignty regarding economic factors, political structure, and constitutional issues will be of great importance. Whether emotional issues will play a major role in decision making is subjective; however, it is fair to say that it will be an emotionally charged event and it could either tear apart the ROC or fuse it together. Placing emphasis on investigating what keeps Canada together is perhaps the key to Canada's future, and salvaging a relationship with Quebec.
Furthermore, the issues of representation in the House of Commons are even more evident in terms of the alienation of certain provinces. Western Canada has experienced political alienation due to the dominance and influence of Ontario and Quebec over policy-making as both provinces contain the founding Cultures of Canada (Miljan, 2012, p. 53) Also, the fact that Ontario and Quebec make up more than 60 percent of Canada’s population attracts policymakers to those provinces while marginalizing the interests of westerners (Miljan, 2012, p. 53). Thus, policymakers will favor Ontario and Quebec as these provinces harbor the most ridings as well as the bigger electors’ base. In fact, Western Canada is also underrepresented in both the House of Commons and the Senate when compared to the Maritime provinces as the Maritime provinces are overrepresented compared to their population. Also, many western Canadians are turned off by the federal government as they have been alienated from major political action and discussion due to low representation (Canada and the World Backgrounder, 2002). In other words, Ottawa does not address the needs and hopes of Western Canada
The Canada-U.S. trade relationship is not static. Political and business strategies and practices change on both sides of the border, and events occur such as "mad cow disease" that are beyond almost everyone's control.
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.
Regionalism is a growing concern for Canadians` as it affects economic stability, nationalism and western alienation. The economic stability is reliant on the regions having strong economic bases (Stilborn, 19). Nationalism with Quebec is a prime example of how distinct regional cultures hinder Canada’s unity, as they want to separate from Canada, while still having the federal Canadian government financially support them. Western Alienation is also a prime political culture that is regionally distinct.
The premier of Quebec, Lucien Bouchard has been attempting to separate from Canada for quite sometime. If he had it his way this topic would be old news by now. His main problem is the Federalist, English speaking citizens of his province. They have been very vocal on their stance to stay apart of Canada. They have sent around several resolutions stating this. It all started in Allumette Island East, which has a population of 458. It has since spread to municipalities along the borders with Ontario and the United States, and in the Montreal area. Unfortunately this means very little considering the fact that these municipalities only represent approximately 6% of the province’s population. When the Parti Quebecois government called for the first referendum on secession in 1980, only 40% were in favor of separatism. When the party took over control again in 1995 the approval rose just about 49%. The fear of the PQ is that if several of the floating voters out there feel that a sovereign Quebec must mean a partitioned, patchwork Quebec, the separatists might well fall back to 40% if that.
Canada is an example of a nation with the question of a country wide unification among all its citizens on the table since the time of confederation in 1867 and even a few years prior. What some these factors that make Canada different from areas around it? How can a country that dominates such large land mass and that bares such vast cultural differences, be united? Can Canadians ever come to agreement upon the values they hold to be important? The debates of these questions continue to plague Canadian parliaments, especially when examining the differences between Canada and the province Quebec. Even though many argue and hope for Canada’s unity in the future, the differences in political socialization and culture present throughout the country creates a blurry vision of Canadian harmony and makes it extremely difficult to realistically vision Canadian unification. Is that, however, a bad thing?
“ Canada 's national obsession seems to be its own identity.” For many years Canada has feared the increasing influence of its North American neighbors on its culture - the United States . It has become a matter of growing concern for the people of power and influence in Canada to maintain their separate cultural identity and to promote their own cultural norms. Gaetan Tremblay presents his views on this topic and does this from the perspective of a person living and working in Quebec.