The foreign policies of many countries have change drastically since the horrible events
of Sept 11th. National security, and the war on terror have moved to the forefront of
policies. Human rights, and nation sovereignty have been demed less important in light of
the serch for torroist and the protection of on borders. This is especially
Canada’s foreign policy has tradionally been one of promoting bilateral agreements,
emphasis on human rights promotion, the peace-building process. At the forefront of
Canadian foreign policy is our relationship with the united States. Canada has historically
followed a policy of balancing our own interests and keeping our unique relationship
with the super power to the south friendly.
For many the most important issue in Canadian foreign policy is our relationshipt with
the United States. With over 80% of our trade exports going to the US, and we being that
country largest receipient of exports as well. The Canada-US trade relation is the biggest
in the world, with over $19 billion crossing the border daily. During his tenure as foreign
affairs minister Axworthy was labelled anti-American, and was seen as putting more
emphasis on international relations then those close to home, and important. Axworthy in
his book, stipulates how gaining more power with the US isn’t through tough stances
against this huge beast we have no hope od winning against, especially with new
president George Bush. But through building relationships with other countries to
stregthen our stance. Mexico is the prime example of this. In forming bi-lateral
aggremments with the southern country, we can stregthen out stance within North
America.
Following the attacks on the twin towers on Sept 11, 2001, there was much sympathy for
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvAmericans and the tragic lose they had sustained.
The current Bush administration obsession with finding the terroist, and the problems they have created with sending troops in to Iraq, has been the main focus of the American government, approaching them now with the idea of a e-community to promote the intersest of continental North-America would not be received well. For a country that is becoming more and more concerned solely about their own issues and concerns, the idea of sellin gthe continent I believe would be a hard sell.
When we look at just a few of the specifics of our trade with the U.S., we find that:
It is the reversal of “tradition, order” and “all things”. In her commitment to revenge, Medea defies the expectation of Greek society, transforming from the “poor Medea”, who is “scorned and shamed”, “[lying] collapsed in agony, into a “vile murderess”, who’s “rage will not relax till it has found its victim”. Medea is an anti-hero; she underplays the supposedly righteous and moral principles of society in demonstrating the contradictions of Jason’s character and generally men, who are themselves guilty of being “swayed by passion” and being “oath breakers, guest deceivers and liars.” As much as Jason is disloyal, Aegeus is equally loyal; he is so beguiled by Medea’s offer of being “granted fertility”, that he is willing to provide “sanctuary” in Athens for a “child killer”. Just as Medea is motivated by her personal passions in neglect of civilised laws, no less are the men in the play. Furthermore, the fact that the ending of the play unfolds in the manner that it does, where Medea evades punishment “in this chariot which the Sun has sent to save her from the hands of enemies” is a testimony to the idea that the constructs of society and their supposedly cultivated principles are arbitrary in the larger scheme of our existence. Through the deus ex machina ending of the play, Euripides condemns humanity’s fixation on contrived ideals and values that ultimately affect greater merit than is actually
For as long as humans have roamed the Earth, misogyny has been an everyday part of life. Some countries have handled it better than others, but misogyny faces every community. In Euripides tragedy Medea, the main character Medea struggles with the misogynistic views constantly facing the society in which she resides. Euripides uses Medea to convey misogyny.
Euripides manipulates the characters, through contrast, to explore or challenge Greek society’s gender roles of female and male behavior through the stereotypes that are established within his plays. In the play Medea, we observe the protagonist challenging the traditional patriarchal system of Greek society and empowering herself throughout the play using the stereotype of feminine behavior in order to manipulate the males (Barlow 163) We observe this through her manipulation of King Creon. The king states, “I order you to go from this land”[;] she then is able to manipulate the king, successfully, for another day (272). The empowerment through this exchange is viewed when the king states, “[W]hy are you applying force, refusing to release my hand?” (339) This line is the first sign of Medea taking control of her destiny, no longer allowing the males to determine it for her. As Barlow points out, “Medea’s ability to “[dissociate] herself not just with women’s stereotypes as they are commonly accepted by women as well as men, but more impor...
It is also important to remember that Euripides did not bestow these masculine qualities onto Medea himself he merely recognized and accentuated those qualities already present from her mythological beginnings. Medea already was
Leonardo Da Vinci was one of the greatest critical thinking minds of his time. One could define Mr. De Vinci as a disciplined person that used his assess to valid his work and artistic views to the public. As definition for a critical thinker is someone who thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence. This is evident from his early development as a young artist were his ground breaking research on the human anatomy. His revolutionary interest in flight would later inspire a generation to be the first to go airborne and fuel his desires for art which would later became so of the greatest master pieces in the world. Just from the thought of exploring what a critical thinker is, it simple to say we all are thinker.
Since September 11, 2001 many people can say that America has changed. Many people question if America has changed for the better or has it just gotten worse. Since the day those four planes crashed around the United States people’s lives have been changed. Many may not realize how their lives have changed, but with new laws passed life is different within America. The United States Patriot Act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on October 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack. The United States Patriot Act was put in place in order to protect Americans, yet has been affecting American’s civil liberties and caused controversy all over the United States.
China the land of giant panda has also become the land of numbers and achievments. Official figures shows that China's economy is the fourth largest in the world when measured by nominal GDP and is predicted to surpass Germany to take the third place in early 2008.
To begin to understand what Euripides was doing, it is best to understand the medium of his art: the Greek theater. Theater was a competitive art among playwrights, with several competitions throughout the year, the greatest of which was at the Dionysian festivals in the spring. Greek drama, tragedy in particular, had little in common with modern acting productions. There was little or no suspense as to the outcome of the play; most all were based on Homeric tales from The Iliad and The Odyssey. The skill, therefore, was not in creating a fascinating plot, but in the subtle changes the playwright could incorporate to increase the dramatic effect. Changing the reasons for conflicts, dialogue, order of events, and sometimes even the outcome of the play were all ways to do this. With all these devices available to the fifth century playwright, what made Euripides so special that he was almost exclusiv...
...ferent purpose. Despite the inherent loss of certain technical and emotional features of the play as a result of the translation, the fundamentally allegorical nature of the play to showcase the need for and to incite change remains. Euripides accomplishes this by way of presenting Medea, a foreigner, in conflict with predominantly accepted and praised figures in Ancient Greek society; namely royalty, men, and civilians, in order to provide transparency into the abuse of power, fallacy of male dominance, and social naivety in Ancient Greek society. In today’s context, the flaws of Ancient Greek society serve to remind us of our vulnerability to accept such fallacious social standards without thorough cogitation and questioning of whom they truly benefit, and as such, Euripides’ Medea remains one of the most prominent and socially relevant works in translation today.
overwhelmingly large in comparison to U.S. GDP and to the small U.S. export base. This
She was born in Oak Park, IL which is a suburb of Chicago, and she enjoyed her life there. Once she graduated from high school, it was expected of her to go to college because all of her family has and has some type of degree, hence, her father being a teacher. She chose to go to Northern Illinois because it was affordable and her best friend was going there, too. Once she was there, she stated that she didn’t like college at all. Her first major was Psychology but it was later changed to Special Ed. because of the experience she had with special kids. As a student, she procrastinated a lot but still got good grades.
Verbal irony is also frequently used by Sophocles. There are many instances of this in Oedipus’ dialogue. Such as the statement, “I will fight for him like I would fight for my father. My search will never end until I take in chains the murderer of Laius”, in which Oedipus is unaware that he is actually the murderer.
When Oedipus inquires “who is this man whose fate the god pronounces?” (1740) after this inquiry almost every statement made by Oedipus becomes ironic because he is referring to himself though he is yet to find out. The audience is aware that the more he looks into the murder of the former king Laius the worse it is going to be for him. Sophocles’ use of dramatic irony keeps the audience one step ahead of the protagonist so they are able to see the errors made by Oedipus. Because the audience has had time to figure what the mistakes are, they are more emotionally invested in how Oedipus will react when he finally understands all the mistakes he has made through the play. As the play progresses the audiences attitude about Oedipus starts to slowly shift; the emotions start to become deeper and we start to see that though he is guilty of murder empathize with
In most dramatic plays, the narrator has intent on a rise and fall, in Second Episode of Medea, Euripides arises the dramatic conflict between Medea’s husbands whom has betrayed her for another mistress is underway. Medea characterizes her husband “Jason the very worst of men” (Medea, 456). She classify Jason as the worst, because in her eyes cheating is