Put An End To Animal Testing

588 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of animal testing on animals

Imagine an animal in a cage waiting to be tested on. How does the animal feel? Stressed? Scared? Afraid? Fearful? Yes to all the above. There are several reasons why animal testing should be banned. There are multiple alternatives to animal testing. What applies to animals may not apply to humans. Lastly, stressed animal’s changes the data from experiments in unpredictable ways. Yes, I believe that animal testing for scientific research is cruel and should be banned. Certain things that apply to animals in labs may not apply to humans. According to the article “The Long Fight Against Animal Testing”. “There is also a problem with information gleaned from animals in labs. What applies to mice, dogs, monkeys or rabbits may not necessarily apply to humans. Our physiology is sufficiently different to invalidate most cures devised by animal experimentation.” (Tatchell). So, why use animal experimentation if it’s invalid? Even if it works on all animals, it might not work on a single person. In fact, while HIV is deadly to humans, it’s not for most laboratory animals (Tatchell). Also, it might make the person ill or it could even be potentially fatal. Then the first people that use the product will suffer. So why risk it? Also from an economic aspect, if people found out that people suffered from your product then more and more people wouldn’t use your product. Since what may pertain to animals may not pertain to humans, scientists should not use animal experimentation. Stressed animal’s causes data to change in uncertain ways. As stated in “Why Animal Experimentation Doesn’t Work -- Reason 1: Stressed Animals Yield P... ... middle of paper ... ...ects laboratory animals and humans are different. So what has a positive effect on the laboratory animal could have a negative effect on a human. Also, distressed animals cause animal experiment results to vary. The results become inaccurate. They’re are many different alternatives to animal testing such as computer- based systems that are up to par with using animals. So it’s not like using animals is your only option. Works Cited Tatchell, Peter. "The Long Fight Against Animal Testing."Guardian. 23 07 2009: n. page. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. . "Why Animal Experimentation Doesn't Work-Reason 1: Stressed Animals Yield Poor Data." Huffington Post 31 07 2013, n. pag. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. . “Call for More Money to Research Alternatives to Animal Testing” European Union News 22 Nov. 2013. Infotrac Newsstand. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.

Show More
Related

  • Let's Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

    2009 Words  | 5 Pages

    Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and uncounted millions of rats and mice are experimented upon and die each year, as living fodder for the great human scientific machine. Some would say that animal research is an integral part of progress; unfortunately, this is often true. On the whole, animal testing is a necessary evil that should be reduced and eliminated whenever possible.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a wealth of evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research. Scientists and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

    1631 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is important because understanding the way in which this happens, attitudes towards animal testing, are formed and how they spread will likely have an impact on public policy on animal welfare and animal rights activism. The information presented and the results will justify my view on animal testing and why it should be banned from scientific reasonings. (75 words)

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    Writing this paper did not affect my original line of thinking in regards to the topic. I support animal rights in every way, and am extremely against any sort of testing. Observing the “necessities” of animal testing did not, in any way, alter my negative view of animal experimentation.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place?

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenal and surely outweigh the animals’ pain and suffering. I feel as though the question of whether or not animal testing is immoral is an easy answer. Animal testing on any species is unethical and should be abolished as soon as possible because it is a form of animal cruelty, provides inaccurate results, and there are better alternatives that can be pursued.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    Point of view: Web. 14 February 2016. The article provides specific examples of illnesses and diseases which have been cured by animal testing that both humans and animals have benefitted from. This supports my topic of animal experiments being used for medical advancements. Pointing out that law often requires that products be tested before being sold to the public, George and Wagner additionally help prove my claim that product testing is a purpose of animal experimentation.

    Read More

  • The Harm of Animal Testing

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    January 1st, 1959, W.M.S. Russell and R.L. Burch describes how there should not be a lot of animal testing. Russell and Burch publish “The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique,” which introduces the principles of Refinement, Reduction, and Replacement which are called the Three R’s. Reduction explained that people should use fewer animals in experiments. Replacement explained the use of non-animal alternatives over animals whenever possible. Refinement explained how people should use techniques to alleviate or minimize the invasive procedures that could potentially cause pain, suffering or distress, and to the enhancement animal welfare for the animals still used. The testing of animals have been going on for a long time and even some people have tried to help animals have less extreme conditions while being tested on. There are cases when animals are being treated badly, The Huntington Life Science was beating the anim...

    Read More

  • Animal Dilemma

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Using animals for medical experimentation, product testing, and education is a controversial subject that often leads to a large argument. While the problems can go into detail, the suffering involved in animal experimentation is painfully clear. Every year there are tens of millions of animals that die in federally and privately funded experiments. A projected 90 percent of all animals used in research are rats and mice, and many other species including guinea pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and farm animals are killed every year to animal testing. (UGA) The experimentation of animals and testing has not stopped because it is not the most accurate or reliable means of research, but because of the tradition, peer pressure, and large amounts of funding from those with strong invested interests into the business. (UGA)

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Arguments against animal testing” by Natasha Bantwal was written for the general audience World Health Organization is interested within the articles concerning animal testing. This article is narrow as a result of Brantwal uses several facts to validate her opinion. In this article, Bantwal has with success, coordinated Aristotle’s tools of logos, ethos and pathos. For example, Bantwal embodies an ethos, otherwise referred to as the argument by character in her writing. Reading through this article, Bantwal energetic comprehension and knowledge of animal testing is clear. To provide herself much additional credit, she quotes a specialist who additionally accepts animal testing is truly not beneficial.

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Sun, Shany. A. The Truth Behind Animal Testing. Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 835.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    Should animal testing be banned? Now, animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, with more and more people appealing to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was to invent drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners also relied on the data, which were obtained from other animal research groups.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science:Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP: Oxford UP, 1993.

    Read More

More about Put An End To Animal Testing

Open Document