Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of animal testing on animals
Effects of animal testing on animals
Effects of animal testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of animal testing on animals
Imagine an animal in a cage waiting to be tested on. How does the animal feel? Stressed? Scared? Afraid? Fearful? Yes to all the above. There are several reasons why animal testing should be banned. There are multiple alternatives to animal testing. What applies to animals may not apply to humans. Lastly, stressed animal’s changes the data from experiments in unpredictable ways. Yes, I believe that animal testing for scientific research is cruel and should be banned. Certain things that apply to animals in labs may not apply to humans. According to the article “The Long Fight Against Animal Testing”. “There is also a problem with information gleaned from animals in labs. What applies to mice, dogs, monkeys or rabbits may not necessarily apply to humans. Our physiology is sufficiently different to invalidate most cures devised by animal experimentation.” (Tatchell). So, why use animal experimentation if it’s invalid? Even if it works on all animals, it might not work on a single person. In fact, while HIV is deadly to humans, it’s not for most laboratory animals (Tatchell). Also, it might make the person ill or it could even be potentially fatal. Then the first people that use the product will suffer. So why risk it? Also from an economic aspect, if people found out that people suffered from your product then more and more people wouldn’t use your product. Since what may pertain to animals may not pertain to humans, scientists should not use animal experimentation. Stressed animal’s causes data to change in uncertain ways. As stated in “Why Animal Experimentation Doesn’t Work -- Reason 1: Stressed Animals Yield P... ... middle of paper ... ...ects laboratory animals and humans are different. So what has a positive effect on the laboratory animal could have a negative effect on a human. Also, distressed animals cause animal experiment results to vary. The results become inaccurate. They’re are many different alternatives to animal testing such as computer- based systems that are up to par with using animals. So it’s not like using animals is your only option. Works Cited Tatchell, Peter. "The Long Fight Against Animal Testing."Guardian. 23 07 2009: n. page. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. . "Why Animal Experimentation Doesn't Work-Reason 1: Stressed Animals Yield Poor Data." Huffington Post 31 07 2013, n. pag. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. . “Call for More Money to Research Alternatives to Animal Testing” European Union News 22 Nov. 2013. Infotrac Newsstand. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
This is important because understanding the way in which this happens, attitudes towards animal testing, are formed and how they spread will likely have an impact on public policy on animal welfare and animal rights activism. The information presented and the results will justify my view on animal testing and why it should be banned from scientific reasonings. (75 words)
Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and uncounted millions of rats and mice are experimented upon and die each year, as living fodder for the great human scientific machine. Some would say that animal research is an integral part of progress; unfortunately, this is often true. On the whole, animal testing is a necessary evil that should be reduced and eliminated whenever possible.
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcast their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of products, and the advancement of medicine.
Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing Labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings.
Each year, thousands of animals are euthanized thanks to animal testing. Several people may argue that scientist are putting the lives of animals in danger by testing on them, on the other hand, is animal lives valued over human lives? By showing emotion there may be some guilt for harming the lives of animals, although puzzling over the percentage of human lives stay saved from animal testing doing all the research worthwhile. Should animal testing be banned?
Mulkeen, Declan and Carter, Simon. “When Should Animals Suffer?” Times Higher Education Supplement 1437 (5/26/2000): p34
Howard, Carol. "Alternative Testing Can Replace Animal Experimentation." AV Magazine CXIII (Spring 2005): 14-15. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 25 Apr. 2011.
Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only brutally hurts them but it also denies the animals the rights they have.
Using animals for medical experimentation, product testing, and education is a controversial subject that often leads to a large argument. While the problems can go into detail, the suffering involved in animal experimentation is painfully clear. Every year there are tens of millions of animals that die in federally and privately funded experiments. A projected 90 percent of all animals used in research are rats and mice, and many other species including guinea pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and farm animals are killed every year to animal testing. (UGA) The experimentation of animals and testing has not stopped because it is not the most accurate or reliable means of research, but because of the tradition, peer pressure, and large amounts of funding from those with strong invested interests into the business. (UGA)
The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Sun, Shany. A. The Truth Behind Animal Testing. Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 835.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
There is a wealth of evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research. Scientists and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.
Should animal testing be banned? Now, animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, with more and more people appealing to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was to invent drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners also relied on the data, which were obtained from other animal research groups.
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...