Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive impacts of marriage
Marriage in the 19th century
Marriage during the 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive impacts of marriage
Marriage is perhaps the most unique contract among all others. Not only does it serve as an emblem for a couple’s love and commitment, but it also holds strong ties to national policy and jurisdiction. Throughout American history, marriage ideals and the paradigm of consensual monogamy have been strongly enforced. By implementing certain policies and excluding other alternatives to marriage, marital laws have essentially promoted monogamous marriage as well as shaped people’s understandings of societal roles. Specifically, the role of women has evolved within the constraints of marriage. In chapter 7 of Public Vows: a History of Marriage and the Nation, author Nancy Cott discusses the shift in marriage during the 1920s. As the Great Depression hit, American families suffered immensely. Still, the government’s “focus of public concern about unemployment was working men [who were] understood as providers for their families” (Cott 172). At this time, the government was entirely dominated by men, so protecting all men was a primary concern. Families were to adhere to strict familial roles - husbands were expected to be the breadwinners as wives to be the homemakers. However, as women became increasingly employed in the workforce in …show more content…
order to make ends meet, their initial role of housewife began to undergo a serious transformation. Men were no longer the only financial contributors and “the vocation of wife-and-motherhood could now be as chosen rather than prescribed” (Cott 167). Despite women’s newfound freedom, they were still faced with economic discrimination and struggled to be on more equal footing with men.
The federal government imposed several obstacles including removing women from public sector jobs, sanctioning New Deal programs, which provided benefits only to white men, and prohibiting two people of the same family from holding federal employment at the same time. Since women did not have the same voice as men, a lot of things they wanted to accomplish were dictated by what the government imposed. Laws deeply entrenched in people’s societal views of family and what was expected of women, especially women in more traditional roles. Men did not want women to work outside the home and feared
change. Some would argue that the struggles that women faced during this period set the initial framework for the birth of feminism. Women established a network around Eleanor Roosevelt and advocated to have full-time careers, while still maintaining the role of wife and mother. In sum, “women’s and men’s arenas of possible accomplishment now overlapped far more [and] marriage ideals had become less hierarchical amidst the language of true love and companionate partnership” (Cott 179). By reflecting on this time in history, it is evident that the efforts made by women during the Depression era left an imprint on the role of women in today’s society. As an author, Nancy Cott illustrates how the national government has played an integral role in shaping the institution of marriage. She offers a logical framework by focusing on the political and social meaning of marriage and how it has been influenced by the economy and gender roles. Cott highlights the initial struggle of women in the workforce, still prevalent today, as women strive to be recognized and respected in businesses while balancing their responsibilities in the home.
May begins by exploring the origins of this "domestic containment" in the 30's and 40's. During the Depression, she argues, two different views of the family competed -- one with two breadwinners who shared tasks and the other with spouses whose roles were sharply differentiated. Yet, despite the many single women glamorized in popular culture of the 1930's, families ultimately came to choose the latter option. Why? For one, according to May, for all its affirmation of the emancipation of women, Hollywood fell short of pointing the way toward a restructured family that would incorporate independent women. (May p.42) Rosalind Russell in His Girl Friday and Scarlett O'Hara in Gone with the Wind, for example, are both forced to choose between independence and a happy domestic life - the two cannot be squared. For another, New Deal programs aimed to raise the male employment level, which often meant doing nothing for female employment. And, finally, as historian Ruth Milkman has also noted, the g...
finally the opportune moment for individuals to build a stable family that previous decades of depression, war, and domestic conflicts had restricted. We see that this decade began with a considerable drop in divorce rates and rise in marriage rates, which is often assumed as the result of changed attitudes and values. However, this situation cannot be only just attributed to women’s
Widespread unemployment of men forced married women to join the workforce to support their families, causing “a 50% increase...from the 1920s” of married women in the female workforce (Depression). Social and government attitudes opposed this sudden enhancement of the familial role of women beyond that of the traditional housewife. To illustrate, 1932 federal laws discouraged women to work by restricting federal employment to one person per family, ensuring the employment of men, who traditionally held jobs (Boehm). Thus, women’s positions expanded in 1930s society, though not without national
This short time of women's freedom came to a halt when The Great Depression came in the 1930s. The government favoured male employees over female ones.
One of the most significant sociological changes in the nation's history began in the last decade of the nineteenth century and the ramifications are still being felt today. This change consisted of the large numbers of women who entered the work force. This dramatic change in American society was accompanied by a great deal of controversy and prejudice directed towards women. It was predicted that female employment would bring about the downfall of society and the change of the American family.
Women were confronted by many social obligation in the late nineteenth century. Women were living lives that reflected their social rank. They were expected to be economically dependent and legally inferior. No matter what class women were in, men were seen as the ones who go to work and make the money. That way, the women would have to be dependent since they were not able to go to work and make a good salary. No matter what class a woman was in, she could own property in her own name. When a woman became married she " lost control of any property she owned, inherited, or earned" ( Kagan et al. 569). A woman's legal identity was given to her husband.
Robson, Ruthann. "The Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History: Marriage." Houghton Mifflin Study Center. 19 Nov. 2005. http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/women/html/wh_022200_marriage.htm.
During the Great War and the huge amount of men that were deployed created the need to employ women in hospitals, factories, and offices. When the war ended the women would return home or do more traditional jobs such as teaching or shop work. “Also in the 1920s the number of women working raised by fifty percent.” They usually didn’t work if they were married because they were still sticking to the role of being stay at home moms while the husband worked and took care of the family financially. But among the single women there was a huge increase in employment. “Women were still not getting payed near as equally as men and were expected to quit their jobs if they married or pregnant.” Although women were still not getting payed as equally it was still a huge change for the women's
Warren Farrell is a well educated man who focuses his attention on gender. In his essay “Men as Success Objects,” he writes about gender roles in male-female relationships. He begins, “for thousands of years, marriages were about economic security and survival” (Farrell 185). The key word in that statement is were. This implies the fact that marriage has changed in the last century. He relates the fact that post 1950s, marriage was more about what the male and female were getting out of the relationship rather than just the security of being married. Divorce rates grew and added to the tension of which gender held the supremacy and which role the individuals were supposed to accept. “Inequality in the workplace” covered up all of the conflicts involved with the “inequality in the homeplace”(Farrell). Farrell brings to attention all ...
Change and hardship go hand in hand, because when hard times emerge society is forced to change. During the Great Depression the idea of gender roles stirred up a great deal of controversy but it also opened the door for change. It gave society a push into a new direction. In order to survive, a number of people had to move away from their traditional way of living in order to take care of their household (Goutour, November 5, 2013). It was now more acceptable and easier for women to find work, while men on the other hand had feelings of emasculation and hostility due to not being able to fulfill their role as the breadwinner (Hollingsworth & Tyyska, 3). This paper will argue that the Great Depression had a major impact on gender roles by examining the shift of dominance within the workforce, the traditional aspects that still remained present within the home and the new meaning that was placed on marriage for both male and females during that time.
Are marriages the same in modern time as they were in the early and middle 1800’s? Today, society allows a much more significant value on marriage than there was in the early 1800’s. Early in the 19th century, women knew when they would get married that they would be financially provided for the rest of their lives, protected from the outside world, and be viewed as having filled society's ultimate role for woman. That ultimate role was being a companion to a man who made a house into a loving home. Men looked forward to marriage because it gave them a companion who would support them for the rest of their lives. In the modern 21st century usually men and women would wait until their early to mid twenties to get
One of the biggest changes in American families has been divorce and the single-parent families. In the article “What is a Family?”, Pauline Irit Erera argues that after World War 11, is when the major changes in families begun. Women were already accustomed to having jobs and working while their men were away during the war, and when the men all came back is when things started to change. Erera says, “The movement for gender equality led to increased employment opportunities for women, while at the same time declining wage rates for unskilled male workers made them less desirable marriage partners.” (Ere...
Mary Bernstein is a Professor at the University of Connecticut. Bernstein observes marriage as a legal contract and relates it to procreation, gender roles, the way the society promotes marriage and to why gay couples want to marry. She examines how historically, sex is promoted for procreation within monogamous married relationships as an economic necessity, whereas after the mid nineteenth century, marriage is more based on love and happiness. The article also emphasizes gender roles present in marriage, where the wife naturally spends more time at home doing housework, whereas the husband is at
This essay explores further changes that may lie ahead as same-sex marriage debates increasingly affect both family law and the convivial construal’s of marriage. Marriage as an institution has transmuted most dramatically because of the cumulative effects of the last half century of de-gendering family law. Same-sex marriage and perhaps even more so, the highly visible cultural debate over it is contributing to this process.
I always carry with me a list of life goals I desire to achieve. One of those goals is to get married to the one love of my life- and it still is. However, I have been led to believe that a monogamous marriage is the only option concerning relationships. Mono-normativity is simply the standard, and anything that is different is too exotic for many Americans. Unbeknownst to my adolescent self, however, America’s historical traditions and institutions have significantly influenced my perceptions of the world I live in. What I found to be normal was not because I deemed it so, but because society had given me a set of concepts and ideas to work with that have always been known to work and fit within the standard model of American life. Thus, I