Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public service role
Bureaucracy learned in public organization
The role of public service
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public service role
“Therefore the primary duty of public servants is to act as guardians and guarantors of the regime values for the American public” (Frederickson, 205). Frederickson viewed those in public servitude as the great ambassadors and representation of the American Government system. When one thinks of such a character we perhaps think about our Founding Fathers or Jimmy Stewart’s character in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Earlier, I pointed out that the public had the ability to voice and relay their opinions on their public officials, especially if they are not pleased with them. Each individual holds certain morals to themselves and certain values are treasured to them, because they are ones they learned through their experiences. …show more content…
The situation to look at here, is the fact that everyone’s morals and values differ. Though there may be some common ground at some point, each individual holds their standards to high accountability. For example, think about the current state of The Trump Administration. There are individuals who absolutely will not support him or anything he does, individuals who support him on everything, and some who support him, but not some of his policies. The underlying problem that all of us come across, with all of the different values and principles out there, what are the true fundamental values to love and benevolence in the public setting? “For that reason, public servants must be both moral philosophers and moral activists, which would require (1) an understanding of and belief in the American regime values; and (2) a sense of extensive benevolence for the people of the nation” (Frederickson,205).
The question poses, what are “American regime values?” With Frederickson’s presentation of what it means to use extensive benevolence and self-love for the field, these principles leave a lot of room for interpretation, since they are generalized statements. “The Code of Ethics has long been recognized as an important means to promote ethical behavior and professionalism in public administration. Included in this obligation are requirements for administrators to support the public’s right to know, to be prepared to make decisions that are not popular, and to exercise compassion, benevolence, fairness, and optimism when interacting with citizens”(Givel, Spivak, 2011). Essentially, love and benevolence in the public administration, we know is someone who loves their country and takes pride in representing it, someone who abides by the constitution and the code of ethics, and wants to represent or help their community. Once again, the same issue surfaces, which these guidelines leave room for interpretation, in which how serving the public and how the public is being served will create differences on various
platforms.
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is an inspirational and comedic take on American politics. The film centers around Jeff Smith, a Boy’s Club leader similar to a Boy Scout troop leader, that is appointed to the U.S. Senate after one of his state’s representatives dies. Smith is chosen because a corrupt businessman and political boss, Jim Taylor, advises Governor Hopper to appoint someone who will listen to commands. Taylor and the state’s other senator, Joseph Paine, are trying to pass a bill through Congress that involves a provision for building a dam on a creek in Paine and Smith’s home state. Taylor has been buying land around the dam’s site for next to nothing, in hopes of turning it for an immense profit
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is a film about an average man’s journey and experience in Congress as Senator of Mississippi.
In 2014 it is very common to see shows about political corruption such as Scandal and House of Cards. However, it was not the first. In 1939 a director named Frank Capra directed a film called Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. It was one of the first political-comedy dramas of its time. The film illustrated the political corruption specifically in congress which was never done before.
Burns, James MacGregor, J.W Peltason, Thomas E. Cronin, and David B. Magleby. Government By The People. 01-02 Edition ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002
During and after the turmoil of the American Revolution, the people of America, both the rich and the poor, the powerful and the meek, strove to create a new system of government that would guide them during their unsure beginning. This first structure was called the Articles of Confederation, but it was ineffective, restricted, and weak. It was decided to create a new structure to guide the country. However, before a new constitution could be agreed upon, many aspects of life in America would have to be considered. The foremost apprehensions many Americans had concerning this new federal system included fear of the government limiting or endangering their inalienable rights, concern that the government’s power would be unbalanced, both within its branches and in comparison to the public, and trepidation that the voice of the people would not be heard within the government.
Mr. Smith is portrayed as an honest man with strong opinions. He is the ideal politician in an ideal society. The film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington depicts a "reassuring image" that happens to be "an image of the past" (Wheeler). However, in today's legislature, people like Mr. Smith are rare due to the fact that a politician's primary goal is re-election. The good of the people may come as another intention of a politician, but it is always secondary to "bringing home the pork." There should be more people like Mr. Smith because the legislature would be able to make decisions more effectively and efficiently, rather than how slowly they currently operate. This is an unfortunate truth, yet it is how our society has been shaped to operate. This becomes apparent after close examination of the United States legislature today and viewing of the film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.
In social studies class we watched the movie Mr.Smith Goes to Washington. This movie was described as “Frank Capra's classic comedy-drama established James Stewart as a lead actor in one of his finest (and most archetypal) roles” by rotten tomatoes. This movie displayed how the government was and somewhat still is corrupt. The corrupters make a mistake by appointing a new senator who is naive but determined.
During the early 1800's, America struggled with the search for identity and the shift toward Liberal Individualism. The revolutionary words of freedom, equality, and brotherhood gave birth to the doctrine of government by the people, for the people, and of the people. These principles were the substance of democracy; these tenets, though fundamentally sound and idealistically honorable, seemed elementary, but to assume that the ideals of democracy were rudimentary and easily attained was a national betrayal. This betrayal, depicted as the futility of the individual to achieve political and representational inclusion in the government and, more importantly, the realization of his importance, belied the struggle.
In the 1939 film, Mr.Smith Goes to Washington, the filmmaker gives a distinct contrast between the idealized and assumed morality of American patriotism and the reality of the corruption that can be found within the political machines of the government. As seen in this film, the human desire for money and power is often a drive that individuals within the government cannot help but clasp onto. For example, Clarissa Saunders proclaims that she is only in her job for “money and a new suit of clothes,” Joseph Paine elects Smith as a way to remain in control of the Senate and to remain connected to the power source of Jim Taylor, and the political machine Jim Taylor attempts to influence Senate to push a bill through that will continue to increase the power of his own monopoly. However, when Jefferson
How does film apply to you? The idea of civic virtue is what citizens of the global community are obliged to do. It is a philosophical ideal that has become a vital part of the foundation of United States government. Furthermore, the concept of civic virtue also deals with the responsibility of the individual toward society and often the responsibility of society toward the individual. The following films all exemplify the idea of civic virtue, workings of United States government, current social, political and economic issues. The films include: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (directed by Frank Capra), Taking Chance (directed by Ross Katz), American Violet (directed by Tim Disney) and The Insider (directed by Michael Mann). As Frank Capra
Jefferson smith embodies the true meaning of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all men. Even when all odds are against him, he stands up for himself to have his voice heard. Jim Taylor’s political machine nearly kills Mr. Smith’s character in the film, but righteousness prevails in the end. Frank Capra develops the theme of the common man making a difference in "Mr. Smith goes to Washington", through political actions, idealist morals of Jefferson Smith and through specific scene extras. Throughout history many have acclaimed the role of Jefferson Smith in politics. “Half a century after its 1939 release, then, Frank Capra’s film had become a cinematic allusion par excellence in both local and national
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
Public administration as a field of study and as a practice has continually evolved with American society. The United States has survived and thrived through major cultural shifts, varying degrees of economic climates, and both civil and world wars. Through out all these changes in our country, one thing has always remained the same, the fact that we are an ever evolving and always changing nation. Theories and forms of practice of public administration have also evolved parallel with the history of the United States. There have been numerous events in American history have lead to changes in society and the practice of public administration has both led and followed in the adaptation process of such monumental changes.
In public administration, the main and the largest goal is to create public value in a form of transparency and trust between the public servants and the citizens. In order to achieve this targeted value, public administrator shall maintain ethical conduct throughout his decision-making and performance. Therefore, public officials are expected to develop reliable ethical competence. Understanding or judging ethics problems is a matter of subjective preference. Even if the organization has codes of ethics, integrity standards will remain limited. Moreover, forcing codes of ethics may lead to another problem, which is the agentic shift and “willful obedience” when an official repudiates reasoning alternatives solutions. Total compliance prevents public officials from developing their “judgment skills” necessary for resolving complex or new problems. (Whitton 2009, 240) Thus, developing ethical competence does not rely on the limited codes of ethics, but on training public officials to improve applicable knowledge and skills through training.
Woodrow Wilson’s purpose in writing “The Study of Administration” is to bring awareness that the government systems in place need to be re-evaluated and improved. Wilson encourages we need to examine the history of administration set forth by others in determining certain needs to be accomplished in effective ways and methods. Wilson’s desirable outcomes for research within the public administration field are for government systems to become more productive and organized.