Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of political corruption
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the 1939 film, Mr.Smith Goes to Washington, the filmmaker gives a distinct contrast between the idealized and assumed morality of American patriotism and the reality of the corruption that can be found within the political machines of the government. As seen in this film, the human desire for money and power is often a drive that individuals within the government cannot help but clasp onto. For example, Clarissa Saunders proclaims that she is only in her job for “money and a new suit of clothes,” Joseph Paine elects Smith as a way to remain in control of the Senate and to remain connected to the power source of Jim Taylor, and the political machine Jim Taylor attempts to influence Senate to push a bill through that will continue to increase the power of his own monopoly. However, when Jefferson …show more content…
Smith enters the scene, he does not have such cravings for wealth and political authority and therefore contrasts greatly with those around him. Even though Smith knows little about American politics and how to even carry out his duties as a Senator, what sticks out the most is his patriotism and humility. Even in the first few moments of arriving at Washington, Smith is in awe of his surroundings and the historical atmosphere around him.
By being in Washington, he feels a strong sense to emulate the historical value to fight for and help the American people. Smith, therefore, immediately begins writing a bill for a National Boys Camp to benefit boys across the country to learn simple life skills. By doing so, Smith does not simply look out for his own needs (e.g. his own wealth and power), but for the needs of others. Therefore, such characteristics of Smith are the complete opposite of those around him. As a result, Smith becomes are victim to the abuse of power by his fellow senator Joseph Paine and the political machine of Jim Taylor. Smith and his bill is seen as a threat and he is consequently wrongfully accused in an effort by Taylor and Paine to not lose their deathly grip on their selfish control. However, in the end, Paine cannot continue to live his life of selfish advancement and cannot bare to see Smith suffer any longer. As a way to pacify Smith’s sufferings and his own internal sufferings, Paine ends up confessing his part in pushing the graft of the
bill. In the end, this film shows that even though it is impossible for completely get rid of corruption within our political system, the example of Smith demonstrates the need to recognize and combat the deviation away from American patriotism and honesty. Therefore, I believe that the filmmaker was incredibly successful in making us question why the actions of Smith seen so praiseworthy and humble. By watching this film, one cannot help but ask why this type of morality seems to no longer be expected as an essential element within our government.
During the Gilded Age—a period that began in the 1870s wherein the United States experienced tremendous economic growth—affluent industrialists such as John D. Rockefeller, Andrew W. Mellon, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P. Morgan, and Andrew Carnegie exercised, owing in large part to their wealth, enormous influence over the direction of American politics. Though left unaddressed during the Gilded Age, the issue of corporate involvement in political affairs was eventually identified as a corrosive problem in President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1904 State of the Union address. In his address, Roosevelt asserted that corporate spending in federal elections had the potential to engender corruption—or the appear...
and takes his oath of office. Paine advises Smith to write a bill, to show his commitment to serving the people after a small fiasco with the press misrepresenting Smith. Smith decides to create a bill establishing a national camp for boys that would use money lent by the government and paid back through donations from attendees of the camp. The site for the camp, unknown to Smith, is on the same area that Taylor’s dam is supposed to be built. Smith finds out, and Taylor attempts to quiet him. Smith decides to attempt to bring Taylor and Paine’s corruption to light, but is interrupted by Paine on the Senate floor. Paine accuses Smith of buying land where the boys camp is to be built so he can sell it for profit, essentially dumping Taylor’s scheme on Smith. Smith is investigated by a committee, in which Taylor has lined up false witnesses to attest to the alleged, and untrue, dealings of Mr. Smith. After receiving a recommendation of expulsion, Smith is allowed the floor to address the Senate one last time, an idea given to him by his secretary, Clarissa Saunders. Smith launches into a filibuster, hoping to stall for long enough so his constituents can rally support for his cause. Taylor, however, uses his connections to spread propaganda against
The book Plunkitt of Tammany Hall is not only a monument to George W. Plunkitt's 40 plus years as a senator, it is also a monument to his enormous ego. G. W. Plunkitt was a well-liked man among his supporters and Tammany men alike. He had opposition from reformers who accused Tammany Hall of illegal activities involving graft. But, according to Plunkitt he never engaged in, "blackmailin', gamblin' or disorderly people." He said that "the politician that steals is worse than a thief. He is a fool." Plunkitt made a fortune in politics, and he did it all through honest graft. He says that even if his worst enemy wrote his epitaph that he could not do more than write: "George W. Plunkitt. He Seen His Opportunities and He Took 'Em."
In 2014 it is very common to see shows about political corruption such as Scandal and House of Cards. However, it was not the first. In 1939 a director named Frank Capra directed a film called Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. It was one of the first political-comedy dramas of its time. The film illustrated the political corruption specifically in congress which was never done before.
George Washington Plunkitt was a complicated politician from New York in the 1900’s. He had his own questionable way of seeing what’s right and what’s wrong. Plunkitt’s Ideas of right a wrong sometimes seemed to be off. However, some of his ideas about things that needed to be reformed were as true then as they are now. Plunkitt seemed to be a man that knew how to get what he wanted out of people with very little effort. From the perspective of an outsider this could make him hard to trust, but to people then this wasn’t a problem.
During the 1800’s, business leaders who built their affluence by stealing and bribing public officials to propose laws in their favor were known as “robber barons”. J.P. Morgan, a banker, financed the restructuring of railroads, insurance companies, and banks. In addition, Andrew Carnegie, the steel king, disliked monopolistic trusts. Nonetheless, ruthlessly destroying the businesses and lives of many people merely for personal profit; Carnegie attained a level of dominance and wealth never before seen in American history, but was only able to obtain this through acts that were dishonest and oftentimes, illicit. Document D resentfully emphasizes the alleged capacity of the corrupt industrialists. In the picture illustrated, panic-stricken people pay acknowledgment to the lordly tycoons. Correlating to this political cartoon, in 1900, Carnegie was willing to sell his holdings of his company. During the time Morgan was manufacturing
Andrew Jackson, revered as the first common man to become President, symbolized the average citizen having the opportunity to climb the ranks within America 's democratic system. However, the profits of Jackson 's administration succeed in concealing his immoral procedures and behavior. Jackson 's methods worked accordingly to the reasoning of the father of political science, Machiavelli, who said, “The end justifies the means”. He achiev...
Peterson, Merrill D. The Jefferson Image in the American Mind. London: Oxford UP, 1960. Print.
Mr. Smith's values make him unique and give him the ability to be noticed within the legislature. The manner in which the United States legislature is currently set up allows someone similar to Mr. Smith to thrive in society...
Ernst, Joseph Albert. Money and politics in America, 1755–1775; a study in the Currency act of
Joseph J. Ellis’s main points throughout the book is not only to describe the historical perspective and success of the founding fathers but also the personal emotions, joys, regrets, familiar tragedies and ultimately the final judgments they make about each other and the Revolution. “I wanted to write a modest-sized account in American history without tripping over the dead bodies of my many scholarly predecessors, hoped to render human and accessible that generation of political leaders customarily deified and capitalized as Founding Fathers”(ix).
The early 1800’s were an unusual time in the history of the United States. A country in its infancy, growing, turbulent, and filled with intrigue where political and economic fortunes were made and lost overnight. While the country was founded on noble ideas---and no doubt these powerful ideas were taken seriously---how such ideas were to be put into practice created fertile ground for personal ambition and interest to be a stronger motivator than the “common good”. In fact, at times it appears that the ideas were little more than vehicles for the personal ambitions---and in the case of this story---the personal vendettas of powerful personalities.
Slayton, Robert A. Empire Statesman: the Rise and Redemption of Al Smith. New York: Free, 2001. Print. (99)
I am George Washington. I was born on February 22, 1732. I was raised in Virginia. At the age of 11 I lost my father he died so I went to my brother Lawrence at Mount Vernon that’s when I learned standards of contemporary etiquette, Latin and mathematic. I also practiced horseback riding. Engaged in the foxhunt and learned ballroom dancing. Not for long and my brother died in 1752 so I inherited Mount Vernon. I entered the state militia and I was sent by governor Robert Dinwiddie to warn the French to retire. After what happened I was unanimously elected by the Electoral College to be the president. I got 132 electoral votes, winning each of the fifteen states. I was a surveyor in colonial Virginia and I fought in the French and Indian war
Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s literary works, such as The Persian Letters and The Spirit of the Laws, answer essential questions about the United States of America’s government and society. These literary works describe Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s philosophy about government’s appropriate role within a society. Analyzing the corruption of previous governments around the world, these works offer solutions to balance the power of administrations. This paper demonstrates Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s effect on the United States of America’s government and society.