Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of government
Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s literary works, such as The Persian Letters and The Spirit of the Laws, answer essential questions about the United States of America’s government and society. These literary works describe Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s philosophy about government’s appropriate role within a society. Analyzing the corruption of previous governments around the world, these works offer solutions to balance the power of administrations. This paper demonstrates Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s effect on the United States of America’s government and society. Throughout history, literary works written by revolutionary people can profoundly impact the world around them. One example of a literary work that profoundly impacted a nation was Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws. Although this was a …show more content…
controversial work during the Glorious Revolution, as the Roman Catholic Church once banned it, the United States of America’s Constitution was based off of the ideas of a French man’s work. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Bréde et de Montesquieu’s political philosophy demonstrates how one man’s ideas can influence a nation. The early life of Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu such as his education and careers defined him into the influential figure he became as an adult. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu was born on January 18th, 1689 into a noble and successful family. A few years after his mother, Marie Françoise de Pesnel, died Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu began his education at the age of seven at Oratorian Collège de Juilly to study general educational courses. In 1708, he continued his education by attending University of Bordeaux where he graduated with a law degree. After his father’s death in 1713, he returned to the University of Bordeaux to counsel. A year after his father’s death, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu married Jeanne de Lartigue a practicing Protestant who bore him three children. In 1716, his uncle died leaving Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu an inheritance of the title Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu. The next eleven years of his life were spent presiding over Tournelle as the chief of judicial and administrative body. Later in his life during 1728, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu was elected Académie Française. Before his death, the Roman Catholic Church placed The Spirit of the Laws on the index of forbidden books due to its radical political philosophy. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu inevitably met his death in 1755 where he died of a fever. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s early life was parallel with several momentous events. England’s declaration of constitutional monarchy was one of these events during the Glorious Revolution. The Glorious Revolution was a rebellion led by a union of English Parliamentarians with an objective to overthrow King James II of England. A few results of the Glorious revolution were a war with France and the alliance of England and Scotland. This experience during Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s life shaped many of his political philosophies. The influence of the Glorious Revolution is evident in some of his literary works such as The Persian Letters and The Spirit of the Laws. In these literary works, he suggests a government with a system of checks and balances in order to maintain an uncorrupted administration. During Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s lifetime, he wrote two major works that have profoundly impacted the United States of America’s government and society.
Starting in a chronological order, The Persian Letters was the first literary work he wrote during 1721. In his early 30s, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu composed this fictional work describing two Persian traveller’s journeys across the world. In The Persian Letters, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s message throughout the literary work was to expose the advantages and disadvantages of different styles of government around the world, the derivation of political authority, and the appropriate role of law. While the Persian travellers toured the world, a common theme was civilians serving a political authority that is greater than them. Another theme in this literary work was virtue along with self-knowledge were almost unattainable values in the
society. The succeeding literary work written by Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu heavily influenced the United States of America’s Constitution. The Spirit of the Laws is a literary work that argued for three separate divisions in power for the government. These three branches of government were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judiciary Branch. An extremely simplified example of the power of these branches is as follows. The Legislative Branch has the ability to pass bills and a vast amount of authority to tax. Under the Executive Branch, a person has the ability to execute bills proposed by the Legislative Branch or to veto the bills. The Judiciary Branch of government determines what the bills or laws passed by Congress mean. Although this is a brief glimpse of each of these three branches of government’s power, these branches are able to oversee one another in order to maintain an equal amount of power throughout a government. For example, the Legislative Branch has the ability to pass a bill for the Executive Branch to overlook. The Executive Branch of the government can veto or pass the bill. However, if the Executive Branch continually vetoes bills, the Legislative Branch can overrule the Executive Branch with a two-thirds agreement from the Legislative Branch. This seemingly simple idea of a system of checks and balances within a government has become fundamental in the foundation of the United States of America. Although The Spirit of the Laws was written decades before its relevance, its ideas about political philosophy are correspond to essential concepts that form the government of the United States. Throughout the course of any person’s life, many influential figures can shape the way a person views the world. For Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu there were four major influential people. John Locke, an English philosopher known as the “Father of Liberalism,” was one of these influential people. John Locke’s philosophy was a person’s natural rights. These natural rights a person is entitled were life, liberty, and property. Although this philosophy was important, one of the most influential politically philosophical theories John Locke defended was the idea of a majority rule in government and a separation in government powers. This idea of a separation of powers can been seen in one of Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s literary works, The Spirit of the Laws where the idea of a government with a system of checks and balances was introduced. Another one of the influential people in Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s life was Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury had the political philosophy that a person’s best chance for happiness can be attained under an authoritarian-sounding sovereign. This authoritarian-sounding sovereign was a government in which one absolute ruler has complete rule over every aspect of government. Another belief Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury had was that people are susceptible and easily directed astray when struggling to understand the world. Therefore, the ruler of the authoritarian-sounding sovereign government would be a person who is unsusceptible to corruption. This idea of people being vulnerable to corruption is seen in Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws. In this literary work, he wrote about his political theory of separating the government into three branches. In this system, every branch oversees a different branch of government in order to maintain equal power throughout the system. Although the theory of separating the government into branches would not completely eliminate human corruption, he believed this political theory would aid in an effort to minimize the amount of fraud within government. The third influential figure impacting Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s was Aristotle. This Greek philosopher believed citizens have to actively participate in politics in order to be content in society. If the citizens were not content with their society, people actively participate in a reformation effort better the government through revolutions. Although Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu did not include focus on rebellions in this literary works, Aristotle’s political philosophy is parallel to the discontented society during the Glorious Revolution of Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s early life. The fourth significant character was Marcus Tullius Cicero. Marcus Tullius Cicero’s political philosophy was somewhat similar to that of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury; his political philosophy was that the people who currently hold an office in government were corrupt. In order to fix the corruption in government, the people presiding in an office should have values where they place others before their self-interest. People with this type of character would make excellent officers in a government. This idea of the corrupt human nature corresponded to Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s idea to separate authority in government to minimize the level of corruption. Although the theories and philosophies of each of these individuals vary, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu incorporated small portions of each of these people’s ideas into his literary works. The Spirit of the Laws and The Persian Letters were Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu’s solutions to the corruption within government. In these literary works, he offered ideas that were plausible to resolve the majority of the corruption. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu believed in a government with a set of checks and balances that separate the power of the government to minimize fraud. By representing governments from all around the world in his literary work The Persian Letters, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu demonstrated the systems of different authorities. Without a system to balance the power of a government, the corruption of the nation’s authority is assured which Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu demonstrates in The Spirit of the Law. By suggesting ideas on governing a nation, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu believes he can minimize corruption within a government system. This idea to govern a nation is this faction was adopted by the United States of America’s Constitution.
The Constitutions of both the Iroquois and the United States have similarities and differences between them. The Iroquois constitution came earlier in history than the U.S one did. Some of the same ideas that were in the Iroquois’ constitution were carried over to some of the ideas that we use in our government today. In this paper I will compare and contrast these ideas as they relate with one another. Ideas like Vito Power, When a Leader Gets Sick, 3 Branches of Government, A Bicameral Legislature, and impeachment are portrayed in both of these constitutions.
In this paper we will discuss the different point of views on the revolutionary war period that lead up the creation of the constitution between Howard Zinn and Larry Schweikart. It is true that the constitution as created by the rich, however the rich were more educated than the poor at the time, making them the reliable leaders of the society. This said, the rich might have tweaked the Laws to their slight advantage. Schweikart explains the creation of the constitution in order to fulfil the needs of the population. However Zinn emphasizes the fact that the government is controlled by the elites who benefit the most form the foundation of the constitution.
The eighteenth century, a time of turmoil and chaos in the colonies, brought many opinionated writers to the forefront in support or refutation of the coming American Revolution. This highly controversial war that would ultimately separate the future United States of America from Great Britain became the center of debate. Two writers, both of whom supported the Revolution, now stand to fully illuminate one side of the debate. Thomas Paine, a radical propagandist, wrote many pieces during this time including “The Crisis Number 1” (1776). Through writing, he appealed to the “common man” in order to convince them to gather their arms and fight for their freedom. In this document, he utilizes many of the same rhetorical skills and propaganda techniques as Patrick Henry, a convincing orator, did in his famous speech delivered to the state’s delegates in 1775. Among these techniques are transfer, abstract language, and pathos. In both works, these were used to call the audiences to war. These influential pieces both contained a call to action which, through the use of strong and decisive language, aided the beginning of the American Revolution.
Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation of the American prison system brought out several interesting facts about America and how it governs itself. He talks of the danger of greed for money, the importance of forming associations, and the power of influence in town government. Although many of his observations have since changed, many of them bring about legitimate points about American government and society.
In this paper I will compare the theories and ideas from both Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France and John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty. In comparing these two philosophers, I will be paralleling their ideas and my own ideas I will be attributing them towards the modern day whistleblower, Edward Snowden. Political figures, government representatives and philosophy advocates have carefully studied Burke’s and Mill’s writings over hundreds of years to better understand their theories on governmental control in a society. One of, if not the most noteworthy concept in both their famous writings revolved around the concept of governmental control in a society. Both Burke and Mill have their own theories; they also have many convincing opinions that help them to sustain their own individuality. In order to compare their views of governmental control and relate it to Edward Snowden it is imperative to thoroughly examine and understand each of their perspectives on civilization and governmental control in a society.
be shaped at a very early age. A beggar was chosen to be his godfather
His treatment of the emancipated woman explained most clearly to me the kind of thought process that he used when writing. His prose, while seemingly a logical deduction about the nature of women and the redeeming value of children, would only have made sense to a man in the 19th century and is therefore not revolutionary.
Roald Barthes’s 1967 critical essay “The Death of the Author” addresses the influence of the author in reading and in analyzing his or her writing, the power of the reader, and the option to ignore the work’s background and focus solely on the work. When critically looking at writing, the author is forced to take sole responsibility for the work. Whether the audience loves or hates, whether critics think it is genius or failure. With this idea the creator’s work has a direct correlation to the creator himself or herself, which according to Barthes seems to take away from the text. In other words, the information not stated within the work defines the work. The historical and biographical elements culminate into a limitation of interpreting the text. Barthes goes on to discuss the text itself appearing as derivative, saying that all texts from a certain era will be read the same due to the cultivation of a culture. The direct intent of the author may be muddled due to the translation from author to text to reader, with the text becoming more of a dictionary than anything else. This point ultimately leads to Barthes’s main point: the reader holds more responsibility to the text than does the author. The complexity of different experiences that come from the author into the text is flattened when it is read. The reader comes blindly and has no personal connection to the text. So much information is condensed and made inaccessible to the viewer. Barthes makes the point that a work may begin with the author, but its last stop is with the reader.
The very history of the country, a major contributor to the evolution of its political culture, shows a legacy of democracy that reaches from the Declaration of Independence through over two hundred years to today’s society. The formation of the country as a reaction to the tyrannical rule of a monarchy marks the first unique feature of America’s democratic political culture. It was this reactionary mindset that greatly affected many of the decisions over how to set up the new governmental system. A fear of simply creating a new, but just as tyrannic...
Without its inspiring authors, America would have lost its drive during the initial battles of the Revolutionary War. Literature in the time before, during, and after the Revolutionary War forever made an enormous impact on historical events. In this time, literature assumes a huge position in society and everyone keeps an eye out for the newest piece. The writers of short works such as Letters from an American Farmer, Declaration of Independence and Common Sense all gave Americans a reason to fight for their freedom and surge forward as an emergent independent nation. Thomas Paine implements a mixture of forceful emotions and opinions as well as hard facts and literal common sense to beautifully present his argument against British rule. Paine wrote several pamphlets encompassing everything from why the British should not rule America to rallying the troops to continue fighting for their freedom. J. Hector St. John de Crevecoeur writes about his love for America and his appreciation for the freedoms allowed even though America is imperfect. These letters are about a fictional farmer named Farmer James who, while being a loyal follower of Britain, learns to love American life and its quirks. Thomas Jefferson expresses his desire for freedom from British rule and for America to determine its own future in writing the Declaration of Independence. He devotes his precious time and effort to ensure that America would have a set of strictures to adhere to and not fall into the throes of chaos and anarchy. Each of these authors express their personal philosophies concerning America’s future and the capabilities expected of it through various forms and styles of literature.
In answer to the changes sought out by the rebelling French communities, Edmund Burke’s release of the “Reflections on the Revolution in France” in 1790 depicted the man’s careful denunciation of the destructive nature of the people. Concurrently, Thomas Paine published a direct response in the form of two volumes dubbed “The Rights of Man” between 1791 and 1792. But apparently, Paine was ready to support that risk. In conclusion, Thomas Paine’s views are more convincing than those of Edmund Burke, just because of their motives behind the same.
In addition, authors frequently lack originality and simply take the reader on all-too-familiar voyages into politics, morals, or religion. Successful writers are those who risk and go on to write about topics that many times others have been less willing to address. The product of these extraordinary efforts is compositions richly enhanced by human feelings and real problems that we encounter and relate to our everyday lives…thought-provoking discussions about religion, philosophy, or politics. These pioneering authors are not afraid to write about evil, the perverse aspects of man, or even sexuality… Their true voices have risen from behind the words taking shape in the minds of the readers. Few have done this, but in the 19th Century two remarkable Americans produced compositions of unequal quality. Their styles and the way they approach the reader are different from t...
Since the beginning of time itself, there have been many different individuals who have significantly impacted the world. These impacts on the world can have a range, but are not limited to categories such as science, mathematics, literature, politics, music, athletics and much more. However, of all things, among those categories, one of the most significant impacts on the world, comes from none other than that of literature. The achievements of literature have been known to strike deeper into the hearts of people than many other achievements throughout history. In Fact, many of the most significant works of literature come from one man. This man was considered one of the most influential Romantic Writers of all time and was incredibly well renown for his dramatic, lyrical, and narrative works. The person was none other than that of George Gordon Byron, otherwise referred to as Lord Byron. (The sixth Lord Byron) He was famous for writing eight different plays, focusing on very speculative, or even historical subjects (Although, never intended for stage), and created what is referred to as a very “brooding and defiant personna,” called the Byronic Hero. (Snyder 40). Lord Byron was a well renown poet from the nineteenth century onward because of his very significant works of literature, squandered fortune, ambiguous sexuality, as well as his intense political convictions.
Throughout this year we have explored the many literary movements in our country’s history. The hopes and dreams of the American people have been drastically altered from the time when our forefathers landed on Plymouth Rock in 1620 to present day. Literature has influenced people’s thinking throughout the almost 400 years since our country’s humble beginnings; this country was built on a multitude of great, inspiring literature. Now as this year comes to a close, I reflect on how literature has affected not only this country, but myself. Has the literature I read this year changed my worldview or simply strengthened my original opinions?
"Oliver Twist." Literature and Its Times: Profiles of 300 Notable Literary Works and the Historical Events that Influenced Them. Joyce Moss and George Wilson. Vol. 2: Civil Wars to Frontier Societies (1800-1880s). Detroit: Gale, 1997. 261-267. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.