Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral reasoning moral development
Challenges with moral education
Moral reasoning moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral reasoning moral development
Psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg is widely known for his proposed stages of moral development; he argued that the development of moral reasoning “is a continual process that occurs throughout the lifespan.” (Cherry). Moreover, Kohlberg’s stages of moral development involve three levels, namely: the preconventional moral reasoning, conventional moral reasoning and postconventional moral reasoning. Each of these levels consists of two stages. Furthermore, we will examine Kohlberg’s stages of moral development by creating a character named Ciara. Ciara is a mischievous, temperamental and aggressive 11-year old who studies at a christian school. Throughout this essay we will see how Ciara’s moral reasoning will evolve. To begin with, we will explain the first level of moral development, which is preconventional moral reasoning. Children’s moral reasoning usually occurs at this level, particularly children who are “10-13 years of age...” (“Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development.”). At this level, moral values are influenced by external forces such as the authority; behavior of children depends by their judgments of their actions and direct consequences. “Behaviors that results in punishment are viewed as bad, those that lead to rewards as good.” (Berk 320). Children differentiate right and wrong in terms of what their authority (such as their parents) tell them what is right and wrong by either giving them rewards or punishments because of their behavior. Stage One. Ciara’s advisor notices that she always teases and calls her African - American classmate the ugliest girl in school; as a result, she was sent to her Principal’s office and was faced a serious disciplinary action. If Ciara didn’t tease her classmate (obeyed her schoo... ... middle of paper ... ... Law." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia.com. Web. 29 Sept. 2011. . Berk, Laura E. Exploring Lifespan Development. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, 2008. Print. Cherry, Kendra. "Moral Development - Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development. "Psychology – Complete Guide to Psychology for Students, Educators & Enthusiasts. About.com. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. "Freedom of Speech." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia.com. Web. 29 Sept. 2011. . “Kohlberg’s Moral Stages.” Haverford.edu. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. “Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development.” Pegasus.cc.ucf.edu. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. .
For this experiment we asked Norma Tapia to interview her to find out where exactly she lies in Kohlberg and Piagets moral stages. She is a seventeen year old high school senior who
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development shows the different stages of morality as people change as they get older (McLeod). He had three levels which broke down his stages
The first six years of a child’s life is a window of opportunity when a child unquestionably accepts the virtues modeled by his or her parents (“8 Ways to Raise a Moral Child | Ask Dr. Sears”). In their first few years, children believe that their behaviors are right or wrong according to what a parent tells them. By five years old, a child begins to adopt their parent’s values, whether they are noble or not. Merseault’s childhoo...
Morality, which is one’s general standards about right and wrong behavior, also includes prosocial behavior and other traits such as honesty, fairness, and concern about other people’s rights and welfare (Omrod, 2014). Both morality and prosocial behavior involve multiple parts of the brain, emotions and complex reasoning abilities. Some age-typical characteristics for preschool aged children include, some understanding that behaviors causing physical or psychological harm are morally wrong, a sense of guilt and shame about misbehaviors that cause harm to others, also display empathy and sympathy, and children at this age also show an appreciation for the need to be fair.
There are certain characteristics of parents who influence their children’s moral behavior. The first characteristic are warm and supportive parents, parents who also involve their children in family decisions, parents who models morally thinking and behavior, and finally parents who inform their children of what behaviors are acceptable, expected and reasoning behind. An example of these parents’ characteristics’ can be when a child is upset because their sibling has taken their toy from them. A parent with the above characteristics will talk to the children on their level, ask open-ended questions, and talk about solutions for their issue. The parent will also voice own opinion on what is the acceptable thing to do, and explain why that is. These four characteristics are sort of strategies’ that are excellent for parents to utilize in order to foster their children’s moral development. Parents who are warm and supportive tend to have a secure attachment to their children which is the base for creating a positive parent-child relationship, without that, parents cannot model behavior to the child, as the child will not trust in the parent. By being an informative parent with reasoning, parents teach their children positive socializing and thus an appropriate positive moral behavior. They also provide
The moral development of children can depend on many factors. Parenting and upbringing of the child, their environment, social environment, gender, and race are all aspects that can contribute to how a child develops their moral standards and expectations. Many psychologists have tried for several years to develop a theory of how morality is developed. One in particular is Lawrence Kohlberg (1958). His moral development theory is based on the cognitive development of children and it is thought that moral development proceeds and changes as cognitive development occurs (Arnett, 2012).
We must see then that the child should accustom himself to act in accordance with maxims and not from certain ever-changing springs of action (211).” Maxims, as distinct from disciplinary rules “proceed from the understanding of man (211).” Thus where rules say a child will be punished for “x” and rewarded for “y,” maxims of right and wrong are things one should understand automatically, regardless of punishment or reward. In following a maxim of, say, “do not lie, cheat, or murder”—one does not lie, cheat or murder, not because they fear punishment or seek reward, but because they know such things are inherently wrong.
Children are questioned with whether or not they possess the capacity for moral understanding and development. Monique Wonderly explains, children do have the capacity for moral understanding and illustrates this reasoning through the conclusions made by Jean Piaget and Lawerence Kohlberg. Wonderly states that Piaget’s theory of children’s “moral reasoning is largely determined by [their] fear of punishment and respect for authority” (2). Furthermore, in ...
Theresa based her opinion on the fact that the druggist will be charged with an unfair amount of money for a cheap drug and will not budge on the price. She feels the importance of getting the drug for Heinz’s wife outweighs what’s right or wrong. Theresa is the type of person that views the moral importance of a situation and makes the adjustments for personal gain. Based on the Kohlberg Moral Development theory, we can assume that Theresa falls under the post conventional level of development, which means her age ranges from 13 years and up (Dacey, 2009, p. 248).
At the pre-conventional level, behavior is motivated by anticipation of pleasure or pain. The child is aware of cultural rules and labels of good or bad and right or wrong. (1) The subject interprets the labels in terms of the physical consequence, such as punishment or reward. (3) The child has an extreme self-interest. The first level of moral thinking is generally found at the elementary school level, before the age of 9. This level is divided into the following two stages. (2)
Young children do not have moral knowledge, They do not have the sufficient cognitive qualities of
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Confusion “We do not see that our children also make ethical decision every day in their own lives, or realize how attuned they may be to moral currents and issues in the larger society” (Coles, 2003, p. 438). This quotation in “I listen to my parents and I wonder what they believe” by Robert Coles demonstrates the way parents forget to teach morals to children. While growing up, children have questions about morals and do not get any answers. Parents teach their children about ethics while they focus on the emotional needs of kids; however, parents forget about morals. Children learn morals from their parents, who themselves do not fully understand morals entirely.
According to Kohlberg, individuals progress through a series of stages in the evolution of their sense of justice and in the kind of reasoning that they utilize to make moral judgments (Feldman, R., 2013, p. 426). His work modified and expanded from Jean Piaget’s previous work to form a theory of cognitive development that explained how pre-adolescent children develop moral reasoning (Cherry, K., 2014, October 12). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focuses on children’s ability to distinguish right from wrong based on their perception. His theory claims that individuals progress through the levels morality in a fixed order and
In an attempt to expand normative theories, Kohlberg’s model of moral judgment proposes that individuals cognitively progress through...