Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relation between cognitive and moral development
The effects of racial discrimination
The Negative Effects of Child Abuse and Neglect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relation between cognitive and moral development
Exposer to violence and racial prejudice is one factor that shows why teenagers should not be held responsible for the crimes they commit. For racial prejudice stimulates a negative image in a teenager’s mind, where their more so likely get involved in violent acts, as they grow older. It can be argued that how society treats it teenagers can make or break their chances of becoming useful citizens; this is shown by (Paschall, 1996). McCord and Ensminger (1995) who discovered African study participants that reported racial discrimination did commit more violent acts. And so, if these teenagers did have to deal with feelings of discouragement or unworthiness, there wouldn’t be any crimes for them to be held against.[ 21]
The parent is the primary educator and can therefore influence the child in good and bad ways
Young children do not have moral knowledge, They do not have the sufficient cognitive qualities of
…show more content…
Several studies have shown that parental behaviour is related to juvenile delinquency. The conclusions of these studies show that the lack of an attachment bond between child and parent and the use of inconsistent and hard disciplinary are related to the development of antisocial behaviour of the child. The child had no influence on this parental behaviour and is therefore not responsible for its antisocial behaviour. [30]
Conclusion
There are many layers and aspects to this debate. It poses important questions about whether society should re-evaluate the way it treats teenagers. To punish someone for an act for which he cannot be held responsible would be morally wrong; but evaluating whether this person is responsible is incredibly difficult. It will take the cooperation of many different fields ranging from biology to sociology to answer this question, which is as complicated as it is essential to the development of our
Over the years many violent crimes have been committed more by teenagers. The more serious crime the teenager did with psychology recommends that juveniles aren’t full responsible for what happen. In Anna Quindlen’s essay, The C Word in the Hallway, is about psychological autopsy with many peoples examples and how if health insurances provided coverage, then not many teens would have committed crimes. In Charlie Spence’s essay, Sixteen, talked about his locked up experience. There are crimes that aren’t that bad, but if a crime was committed so badly then the perpetrators should be locked away and be trialed as an adult.
Three broad behaviors are especially notable in understanding this concept. A father’s presence in a youth’s life, his criminal record, and the way he interacts with his children may contribute to youth delinquency. The lack of his presence may result in poverty, poor monitoring, and increased delinquent socialization. His criminal record may influence the record of his youth, or may inhibit the father’s ability to work out of poverty conditions. Finally, abuse and neglect affect a child emotionally, physically, and mentally. These actions can result
According to Price & Kunz, (2003) family structure is a major factor in explaining delinquency. The research aimed at finding a link between cohabiting and other family types with delinquency (Price & Kunz, 2003). They made an important finding that adolescents from cohabiting families are at greater odds of engaging in non-violent delinquency compared to those from biological-parent families. The findings contradict the findings of other studies that show that that youth from broken families are likely to engage themselves in delinquent activities. For example, in one longitudinal study by Juby and Farrington, (2003) they found out that children especially boys who were from non-intact families portrayed negative behaviors compared to those that were from intact families (Juby & Farrington, 2001). Moreover, Prince & Kunz, (2003) performed a meta-analysis involving divorce and juvenile delinquency. They also made a finding that children from divorced homes have a high rate of delinquency compared to those from intact homes.
Perhaps the most imperative argument that was presented to the court was from both Just for Kids Law and professors from the University of Cambridge. They concluded that young people lack thinking abilities and therefore experience genuine problems in predicting acts which consequently lead to situations that should have potentially de-escalated. The implications since the verdict at the retrial in 2016, have been significant to young people. Uncertainties are casted as to whether children have the ability to oblige to complex and blurred legal principles as expected of them by society. An additional concern that was raised was the awareness of knowledge from the child to understand they are criminally liable under the doctrine. Furthermore the event has clarified alternative charges that may be applicable to young people or gangs or who are involved in serious events but did not intend for serious harm. On this account the Ameen Jogee verdict could be utilised for future complex cases as a reference for a secondary participant’s involvement. However other considerations should be taken into account such as the traditional public interest test and also to prosecute against a young person’s actions that mirrors their impact on the offence rather than providing a robust response in the first
Juvenile delinquency may evolve around many different factors before it becomes a problem for society to solve. Gender and family structure can be a large and underlining cause of why children enter the criminal justice system. By examining the gender and family makeup, one could better understand how to treat a troubled individual.
According to the law, children ages 7-15 legally do not know what is wrong or what is right to do. Children who do not know what is wrong or right can commit a crime without knowing how bad the consequences can be. Immature children do not know most factors the way regular human beings know and can commit more errors by accident than other human beings will commit on purpose. Immature children should not be sentenced to life because they rarely know the rules of life and unlike most adults; they do not know what is good or bad about it. For example, “juveniles are different from adults in terms of brain development and maturity levels” (Corrington 1). Crimes children or immatures can commit include killing someone in a fight, choking someone out, or running over someone by accident. Arguments can also build in by saying teenagers should get sentenced to life for being immature and doing things immaturely. If a young teenager runs over another teenager or children and kills them, of course the parents are going to want the responsible driver to pay for what they have done. Sometimes jail is not enough and the parents or family members of victims want to kill whoever was responsible for the disgrace that happened. A big percentage of people do not understand that young children do not know what adults are capable of doing if it was
... relationship does not affect the adolescent’s behavior, but his academic performance. However, it is proven that adolescents from single parent family are more likely to develop deviant behaviors, and one of the main reasons is that the parent is unable to establish a strong bond with the adolescent, as this bond can be used as a shield, deflecting them to be less willing in engaging criminal behaviors. Other factors, such as poor neighborhood conditions, can also result in poorer parenting, which affects the adolescent’s behavior. Also, children who have suffered child abuse are generally filled with more violence, resulting in their aggressive behaviors due to a accumulated anger. Hence, we can conclude that parenting is the main cause for juvenile delinquency as it has the most influence and direct impact for causing an adolescent to develop delinquent behavior.
Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson,
When a young person commits a violent crime, resulting in a death of an innocent person, how many lives should be lost? This is the question at the center of the debate regarding juvenile justice. By examining both sides of the issue, one can more easily understand the complexity of the problem. After considering arguments for and against harsh treatment of juvenile offenders, it is clear that there are no winners when young people are involved in crime.
Studies indicate that positive parenting, including normative development, monitoring, and discipline, clearly affects whether children will become delinquent. Adequate supervision of free-time activities, whereabouts, and peers are critical to assure that children do not drift into antisocial and delinquent patterns of behavior. Surprisingly, little is known about normative and moral development with the family as they relate to delinquency. Single-parent families, and in particular mother-only families, produce more delinquent children than two-parent families. Research indicates that parenting practices account for most, but not all, of the ...
Youth crime is generally thought as being a very recent and modern day phenomenon, however this is widely untrue. Juvenile crime has been recorded ever since the early 17th Century and yet it has only been within the last 100 years that it has become such a significant issue with the general public (Goldson and Muncie, 2006). It is widely known that the present population are much more aware of youth crime and the implications it causes than ever before. There are endless theories as to why crime occurs and about the correct approach to combat it, the main conflict being over whether to treat young people as a threat or as a victim, which is a debate that still continues to this day (Omaji,
Parents’ staying together has been associated with a reason a child may engage in delinquency. Children that grow up in homes where they view their parents arguing or fighting increases the risk of delinquency, aggression, depression, and may lower the child’s self esteem. Children viewing a negative parental relationship has also been linked with decreasing the
There has been a mass increase of juvenile delinquency in the United States, which has made a notable change in our society as a whole. It also directly affects parents, teachers, families, the perpetrators themselves, and of course, the victims. Law enforcement agencies in the United States have made an estimated 2.11 million arrests of minors. These perpetrators who were arrested have either been placed in confinement or they are under court supervision. Juvenile delinquency is described as illegal or immoral behavior, generally among young people under the legal age of eighteen. In order to reduce these high rates of delinquency, parents, and other adult figures, must first ask themselves, what is causing this? What external and internal
Youth delinquency is a massively growing problem in the United States today. Youth delinquency “refers to abnormal social or legal behavior by children or adolescents, for dealing with juveniles, such as juvenile detention centers. There are a multitude of different theories on the causes of crime, most if not all of which can be applied to the causes of youth crime” (Youth Delinquency, 1999 p.1). A youth (juvenile) delinquent is one who repeatedly commits crime. There are multiple reasons for the increase in criminal activity amount the nation’s youthful population.
In today’s generation there are many children and teens that commit crimes to satisfy their self being. Every day we see in the news about the reasons why children or teens commit crimes like murder or homicide. Sentencing juveniles to life in prison is not a right response to prevent homicide and serious murder, because their brains are not fully develop and the bad environment they live in. Teenagers or children need to be remain unformed of preventing crimes in today’s society. With this said, juvenile’s mental brains, backgrounds and growth are the reasons why they are not proficient to maintain themselves in a prison cell.