Teenagers Should Be Held Responsible For Crimes Essay

492 Words1 Page

Exposer to violence and racial prejudice is one factor that shows why teenagers should not be held responsible for the crimes they commit. For racial prejudice stimulates a negative image in a teenager’s mind, where their more so likely get involved in violent acts, as they grow older. It can be argued that how society treats it teenagers can make or break their chances of becoming useful citizens; this is shown by (Paschall, 1996). McCord and Ensminger (1995) who discovered African study participants that reported racial discrimination did commit more violent acts. And so, if these teenagers did have to deal with feelings of discouragement or unworthiness, there wouldn’t be any crimes for them to be held against.[ 21]

The parent is the primary educator and can therefore influence the child in good and bad ways

Young children do not have moral knowledge, They do not have the sufficient cognitive qualities of …show more content…

Several studies have shown that parental behaviour is related to juvenile delinquency. The conclusions of these studies show that the lack of an attachment bond between child and parent and the use of inconsistent and hard disciplinary are related to the development of antisocial behaviour of the child. The child had no influence on this parental behaviour and is therefore not responsible for its antisocial behaviour. [30]

Conclusion

There are many layers and aspects to this debate. It poses important questions about whether society should re-evaluate the way it treats teenagers. To punish someone for an act for which he cannot be held responsible would be morally wrong; but evaluating whether this person is responsible is incredibly difficult. It will take the cooperation of many different fields ranging from biology to sociology to answer this question, which is as complicated as it is essential to the development of our

Open Document