Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Main perspectives in psychology
Theory of moral development by Lawrence Kohlberg and their educational implications
Main perspectives in psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Main perspectives in psychology
In this paper I will discuss six major principles of psychological perspective as they relate to criminal behavior. The first principle is that the individual is the object of interest to be analyzed. Another major motivational perspective is personality, which points to the motives of the individual. The third perspective says that crimes are a result of a dysfunctional mental processes within an individual’s personality. Also, individuals may have a purpose for criminal behavior to fulfill certain needs. This behavior is considered inappropriate only when compared to social norms. The fifth perspective describes normality, what is accepted by society as as being normal. The last perspective is that defective or abnormal mental process may …show more content…
have a variety of causes. The first major principle of psychological perspectives is that the individual is the object of interest to be analyzed. n short, crime control policy based on psychological principles targets individuals and tries to prevent criminal behavior from this point. Any policy aimed at preventing crime by targeting persons such as training, education, promotion of self-awareness, rehabilitation, resocialization or identification risks of criminal behavior are psychological in nature. In addition, psychologists have long recognized that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior of the individual The second major principle is that personality is a major motive on the individual. Hans Eysenck explained crime as result of fundamental personality traits (supertraits). These supertraits he developed were viewed in three dimensions. The first dimension is Psychoticism. Individuals who had high psychoticism are associated with being aggressive, egocentric, antisocial and tough-minded. High psychoticism is also linked to criminal behavior,regardless of methodology. The second one is Introversion/Extraversion. Introverts tend to be characterized with being passive, cautious, and insociable. Extroverts were the opposite being active, sociable, and assertive. Most people, however, are found in the middle of introvert and extrovert rather than being either extreme. The last dimension is Neuroticism/emotional stability, which is linked to traits like anxiety, self-esteem, and emotionality (BOOK). We can also use the early psychological theory regarding criminal behavior by Freud’s psychological perspective as an explanation for personality being a motive. This deals with three aspects of an individual's personality: the id, ego, and superego. The id essentially is everything that is present at birth or instinctive drives. There are two types of instinctive drives, constructive and destructive. Constructive are the pleasures we get from things. Destructive refers to things like aggression or death. The ego is like a moderator between the id, superego and reality. It can be seen as the sanity or conscious of an individual. The last aspect is the superego, the subconscious domain of the psyche. This is learned and developed during the course of individual’s life. The third perspective says that crimes are a result of a dysfunctional mental processes within an individual’s personality.
This is explained through personality disturbances, such as sociopathy and psychopathy. David Lykken distinguished between the sociopath and psychopath. Sociopath refers to antisocial personalities that are due to social dysfunctions. Psychopaths refers to those whose antisocial behavior may result from a defect within himself. They can be intelligent, charming and manipulative, yet lack remorse or empathy. Research has focused on two subgroups of psychopathy: primary and secondary psychopaths. Primary psychopaths are born with psychopathic personalities and display maladaptive characteristics like irresponsibility and lack of conscience. Another subgroup is secondary psychopath. They are born with a normal personality but develop psychopathic tendencies due to personal experience. Events like drug abuse or suicidal gestures are very influential to secondary psychopaths. Other types of psychopaths are charismatic psychopaths and distempered psychopaths. Charismatic psychopaths are usually charming, attractive, and liars. Distempered psychopaths are easily offended and easily ticked off. Dysfunctional mental process within an individual can have a huge influence on their criminal …show more content…
behavior. The fourth perspective examines individuals as having a purpose for criminal behavior to fulfill certain needs.
Donald Andrews and James Bonta defined criminogenic needs as dynamic attributes of offenders and their circumstances associated with rates of recidivism. They may not be actual needs but rather psychological symptoms of maladaptive functioning. Also, individuals may know what is morally right and morally wrong. In the moral development theory by Lawrence Kohlberg, moral judgement develops in three levels, each consisting of two stages. The first level is the preconventional level of morality. It is what is considered right and wrong. The first stage is the “punishment and obedience orientation”. Individuals follow the rules to their benefit as well as avoid punishments. The second stage is when they develop moral relativity. We acknowledge that others have different views on justifying their claims. The next two stages are in the conventional level of morality. It is considered the approach used to maintain a family and social order. At stage three, individuals understand the principle of the golden rule and appreciate things like generosity and forgiveness. In the fourth stage, values of justice are expanded to following the laws and initiating good citizenship. The last two stages are under the postconventional level of morality. That is when a person attempts to balance between individual rights and societal rules. For instance, the fifth level is when
individuals start to question why they should be moral. The last stage is the point that individuals consider various principles on the moral point of view, like living the highest quality of life.These relate to why individuals use moral development when it comes to committing crimes to fulfill certain needs. The fifth perspective describes normality, which is what is accepted by society as as being normal. If someone commits a crime, they are punished based on the norms of society. Not all social norms that existed in the past exist today, so crimes now might of not been crimes back then. According to the social control theory, if the social bounds of a person is weak, they have a higher chance of committing a criminal act. They care what others thinks of them and try to conform with social expectations because of their attachment to others(Criminal Behavior website).
The psychopath know the reasons behind acting a certain way and just don't think about the consequences. Even in the DSM-IV clear definitions of a psychopath doe not exist but the closes to diagnose is anti-social personality disorder. Dr. Hare instead developed the Psychopathy Checklist for people to diagnose psychopathy. The first part of the Psychopathy Checklist looks at the emotional and interpersonal traits of the disorder(Hare, 1993). Some of the emotional qualities that the clinician would look for is as followed: glib/superficial, egocentric/grandiose and lack of empathy.
Trait Theory suggests that the criminal behavior that one may partake in is related to personality traits inherited at birth. “Psychological traits are stable personality patterns that tend to endure throughout the life course and across social and cultural contexts.” (Schmalleger, 2016) This theory also suggests that these traits give criminals “predispositions to respond to a given situation in
1. Cesare Lombroso applied the methods of natural science (observation, measurement, experimentation, statistical analysis) to the study of criminal behavior. Lombroso rejected the classical theory of crime, associated with Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, which explained criminal activity as freely chosen behavior based on the rational calculation of benefit and loss, pleasure and pain. Critically analyze both schools of thought and provide an opinion as to what theory you believe is more relevant.
Sociopaths are prevalent among society, and some researchers, like Martha Stout, claim that one out of every twenty-five people is a sociopath. However, this statistic is incorrect. This statistic is based on the assumption that sociopaths and psychopaths are the same people—which is untrue. While the sociopathic and psychopathic traits overlap, sociopaths differ in that they are obviously nervous and agitated, unable to create the illusions that psychopaths are so proud of. They live on the fringes of society, uneducated and unable to keep a steady job. Psychopaths, unlike sociopaths, are suave and able to maintain an illusion of conformity and maintain relationships on a superficial level. Both, however, are dominantly male, tend to disregard the rights and social mores of others, and have a tendency display violent and disruptive outbursts without remorse. Unlike psychopaths, who completely lack remorse and the ability to love, sociopaths may attach themselves to certain people, though they still remain contemptuous of the rest of humanity (7).
In 1939 Criminologist Edwin H. Sutherland proposed his theory of Differential Association in his Principles of Criminology textbook. Differential Association theory states that criminal behavior is learned behavior. Sutherland along with Richard Cloward, and Lloyd Ohlin attempted to explain this phenomenon by emphasizing the role of learning. To become a criminal, a person must not only be inclined toward illegal activity, he or she must also learn how to commit criminal acts. Sutherland’s differential association theory contends that people whose environment provides the opportunity to associate with criminals will learn these skills and will become criminals in response to strain. If the necessary learning structures are absent, they will not. Sutherland relied heavily upon the work of Shaw and McKay, Chicago school theorists, in high rates of juvenile delinquency. Sutherland's theory of differential association still remains very popular among criminologists due to its less complex and more coherent approach to crime causation. It is also supported by much evidence.
Eysenck, H.J., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1989). The causes and cures of criminality. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 575-577.
The major premise of this is that the development of the unconscious personality early in childhood influences behavior for the rest of a person’s life. Criminals have weak egos and damaged personalities. The main focus of this is mental illness. In regards to social learning theory, one’s criminal behavior is learned through human interactions. Learning theories help explain the role that peers, family, and education play in shaping criminal and conventional behaviors. If crime were a matter of personal traits alone, these elements of socialization would not play such an important a part in determining human behaviors. Mental illness is part of the major crime causation for trait theory. According to some estimates, as much as 50% of the U.S. prison population suffers from some form of mental
Bartol, C. R. (2002). Criminal behavior: A psychosocial approach. (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
From a sociological perspective, explanation for criminality is found in two levels which are the subculture and the structural explanations. The sociological explanations emphasize aspects of societal arrangements that are external to the actor and compelling. A sociological explanation is concerned with how the structure of a society, institutional practices or its persisting cultural themes affect the conduct of its members. Individual differences are denied or ignored, and the explanation of the overall collective behavior is sought in the patterning of social arrangements that is considered to be both outside the actor and prior to him (Sampson, 1985).
In today’s society, one will find that there are many different factors that go into the development of a criminal mind, and it is impossible to single out one particular cause of criminal behavior. Criminal behavior often stems from both biological and environmental factors. In many cases criminals share similar physical traits which the general population do not usually have. For example criminals have smaller brains than properly adjusted individuals. However biological reasons cannot solely be the cause of criminal behavior. Therefore, one must look to other sources as to how a criminal mind is developed. Social and environmental factors also are at fault for developing a person to the point at which they are lead to committing a criminal act. Often, someone who has committed a violent crime shows evidence of a poorly developed childhood, or the unsuitable current conditions in which the subject lives. In addition if one studies victimology which is the role that the victim plays in the crime, it is apparent that there are many different causes for criminal behavior. Through the examination of biological factors, in addition to the social and environmental factors which make up a criminal mind, one can conclude that a criminal often is born with traits common to those of criminals, it is the environment that exist around them that brings out the criminal within them to commit indecent acts of crime.
Criminals come from all walks of life. Some are wealthy business owners while others are poverty-stricken and homeless. Some are 60 years old while others are 16. What makes people decide to become a criminal? Why does one person who gets arrested and faces punishment learn from the mistake and does nothing illegal again while others become prison regulars? Criminological theory seeks to answer these questions in an effort to mold societal influence and implement programs to deter people from committing crimes. One such theory is the classical theory. Even though some believe that crime is based mainly on social influencers like in the differential association theory, the classical theory is more accurate because it suggests that each person makes the choice to commit a crime based on risk versus reward and because most intentional criminal acts pay some sort of benefit, rarely are they seen as not profitable.
Psychological theories of criminal behavior emphasize criminal thinking patterns or personality defects. These theories emphasize individual differences in behavior and the approaches to thinking, feeling, and decision-making that make some people predisposed to committing criminal acts.
There are different types of social phenomenon in our society, and one existing phenomenon that capture our attention like no other is crime. What is crime? Crime is an abnormal behavior that violates norms, and especially cultural standards that we as human are suppose to respect and have certain behavior towards. Standards such as : the changing of social, political, psychological, and economic conditions that have an effect on the justification of crime and the structural reaction of the criminal justice system created by Federal and State officials. Rational and deterrence theories are two important theories in this perspective. Research through out history provided us with different theories to help explain why people commit deviance acts.
Understanding Psychology and Crime; Perspectives on Theory and Action, New York. PENNINGTON, D ( 2002) , Introducing Psychology: Approaches, Topics and Methods, London, Hodder Arnold TANNENBAUN, B, (2007),Profs link criminal behaviour to genetics [online] , Available at: http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2007/11/profs_link_criminal_behavior_to_genetics [accessed 16th October 2011]. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/41182390/Explanations-of-Criminal-behaviour
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.