Psalm 13 Essay

417 Words1 Page

Setting
The Psalm 13 is used in temple ceremonies (communal) even though the original expression was individual lament. But scholars agree that psalmist express his/her personal experience of deep sorrows, struggles and enemies surround him/her. Broyles suggests that Psalm 13 verse 4 point out struggle has brought near death and prolonged suffering. At the same time he says that there is no way to know the nature of suffering. It may not be physical suffering but groaning from separation from God. Craigie suggests, “the distress is probably the fear and proximate to death brought by grave illness.” For Mays distress comes from existential crisis. He says, “the Psalm is concerned … with s structure of neediness that brings to light the full character of the predicament of existence … what attacks our existence exposes and makes us wonder world and God.”
Regarding the date of the Psalm there are two opinions. One group accepts the Psalm as a Psalm of David which is known as superscription. For them the date text is taken for granted. The other group does not take the superscription value. They agree that the date of text cannot be dated with certainty.

Authorship …show more content…

It is legitimate to speak of Davidic collection rather authorship of David. In Hebrew David means “on behalf of David,” “for David,” “belong to David,” “with reference to David,” “dedicated to David,” or it refer reign of Davidic descendant. Mowinckel suggests that Ledavid must be translated “for David.” There are some scholars who are in favour of Davidic authorship even though they deny Davidic authorship. Kraus says that Ledavid should be understood as indicating Davidic authorship. Craigie admits that tradition identifies David is as a composer, musician and signer. The Psalm 13 has connection in David’s

More about Psalm 13 Essay

Open Document