Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free trade and protectionism
Free trade and protectionism
Arguments for protectionism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Free trade and protectionism
Should We Use Protectionist Trade Policies to Help Shield Canadian Industries from Foreign Competition?
Over the last decade, whether or not we should use policies that shield our domestic businesses from the foreign competitors became a concerned issue for Canadians. Some believe that these policies are to be not to be used in Canada, while others think the opposite. Personally, I believe that Canada should terminate protectionism. First, it will decrease Canada’s competitiveness, second, protectionism has already failed, and lastly, even though free trade makes some Canadians lose jobs now, it prevents a worldwide depression.
First, protectionism will hinder Canada’s ability to compete against other countries of the world. Free trade does the exact opposite. Selling foreign goods in Canada pressures Canadian companies to produce better and cheaper items, and allows Canada to raise its competitiveness worldwide, not just domestically. The inefficient factories in Canada must close for Canada to remain prosperous, and Canada should not subsidize those companies unless it is du...
Canada and the United States are the largest trade partners in the world. It is the result of the geographical position of two countries and the free trade between two countries. It should be a great thing for the economies of both countries, but since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed, American businesses almost took over the Canadian economy. When the American companies started to make more business in Canada, it brought more jobs and money to the country in the short-term. But as a long-term effect Canadians became even more depended on the U.S. as the American companies started dominating Canadian companies in Canada. Also, today Canadian manufacturers have little protection from the government when ch...
The Canadian government is using all its power to protect the Canadian culture and domestic business. “in 1920s, the Canadian government imposed protective tariffs on foreign magazines.” This is one good example that the Canadian government has a huge concern towards citizens losing their culture and the nation is losing business.
Roberts, Russell. (2006). The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Last year, Canada received 443 billion dollars in revenue from exporting goods throughout the world. Almost 54% of that was covered by Canada’s three major exports (Stat Can.) - mineral products, transportation items, and electrical equipment and machinery. While preparing theses resources for export may be difficult, it is worth it. This essay will review the large role exports play in Canadian economy by being a immense source of income, allowing Canada to maintain robust trade routes and relations throughout the world, and providing Canadians with many jobs.
The Canada-U.S. trade relationship is not static. Political and business strategies and practices change on both sides of the border, and events occur such as "mad cow disease" that are beyond almost everyone's control.
The United States has for over two centuries been involved in the growing world economy. While the U.S. post revolutionary war sought to protect itself from outside influences has since the great depression and world war two looked to break trade restrictions. The United States role in the global economy has grown throughout the 20th century and as a result of several historical events has adopted positions of both benefactor and dependent. The United States trade policy has over time shifted from isolationist protectionism to a commitment to establishing world-wide free trade. Free trade enterprise has developed and grown through organizations such as the WTO and NAFTA. The U.S. in order to obtain its free trade desires has implemented a number of policies that can be examined for both their benefits and flaws. Several trade policies exist as options to the United States, among these fair trade and free trade policies dominate the world economic market. In order to achieve economic growth the United States has a duty to maintain a global trade policy that benefits both domestic workers and industry. While free trade gives opportunities to large industries and wealthy corporate investors the American worker suffers job instability and lower wages. However fair trade policies that protect America’s workers do not help foster wide economic growth. The United States must then engage in economic trade policies that both protect the United States founding principles and secure for tomorrow greater economic stability.
Canada is great economic superpower that has yet to reach its potential. As the second largest nation by area, we possess vast natural resources. We are a massive importer and exporter on the world stage, who a play a vital role in the stability of the northern hemisphere. Through Canada’s international trade, we export vast quantities of many different foods stuffs, minerals and manufactured goods like cars, while we tend to import lots of Iron, Aluminum and Steel. Our relations with neighbouring nations have been integral in the success of our trade. In 1994 Canada became a member of the North American Free Trade Agreement or NAFTA with the US and Mexico. NAFTA reorganized Canada’s and America’s trading systems to work as one. The trade issue of recent months is about the rising costs of energy in Canada and in the United States. Newly elected President George W. Bush now is proposing a North American energy initiative for a continental power grid. This proposal puts Canada in a very uncomfortable situation. On the one hand we would love to share our resources and appease our super-power to the south. But on the other we prefer to leave our pristine land alone. The growing trend nowadays is that politicians are the ones wanting to please the Americans by giving away our resources, while it is the activist who is concerned about the vast environmental damage this energy legislation could entail.
Mckinney, Joseph. "US-Canadian Economic Relations, Twenty Years after the USA-Canada Free Trade Agreement." British Journal of Canadian Studies 23 (2010): 233-246.
The constant battle between Canada and US and the tariffs that were put on the Canadian lumber had negative consequences on the economy and employment. If the US never put trade barriers in the first place, it would very beneficial for both economies. In this case, from the US perspective, the price of the lumber would go down (since it doesn’t include the tariff); the US consumers/firms would enjoy the lower price. By having decreasing the lower input cost, American firms would expand their production and enjoy higher profits. On the other hand, Canadian producers would focus on producing more lumber; by having no constraints on the current account, this will allow the Canadian lumber industry to increase production and enjoy
Moreover, After WTO ruling, the United States and Canada are acting against each other. In the meantime, US threatened to take action against Canadian steel, wood products, textiles etc. Finally, an agreement done, that prevents trade crisis where Canada removed most of its barriers in split-run magazines. Now, only 11% of the magazines sold in Canada are domestic, remaining 89% are foreign precisely
Tariffs can protect the local industries that face competition from imported goods by imposing tariffs. Tariffs are effective and widely used to protect the local industries from foreign competition (Saranovic, 2006). However, this protection comes with an economic cost, where consumers have to pay a higher price to imported goods, which effectively lowering their buying power and leads to inefficient allocation of resources.
Trade is a significant part of every country’s economy. Almost every country in the world trades with another country and rely on it for their daily life. A country trades their goods with goods from another country because they can produce one good very efficiently, and at low cost and therefore they sell it to another country. The other country has a different good that is scarce to the rest of the world, and they can therefore trade that good for something that they are lacking. China is the United States largest trading partner. The largest amount of goods exported from the United States to Canada were Cars, Machinery, mineral fuel, oil and plastic. The greatest amount of imports from Canada were the mineral fuel, oil, cars, machinery and plastic. These countries trade, because they feel that is the best and most efficient way to get good pro...
There is an ongoing argument about whether or not free trade has an affect on employment. For hundreds of years there have been people who stand on both sides of the fence of this issue. As with most debates, each side presents facts that are presented in a certain light that may cause them to tell a story that may be different than what the actual numbers mean. Those who oppose free trade will say that competition with imports will destroy jobs for people working in those particular industries. While those who support free trade will defend their position by arguing that the increase in exports will instead create jobs, and that competition will help to drive prices down. While both positions tell stories that are true, they fail to accept that for the most part, any effects tend to cancel each other out and employment levels remain stable and level (Irwin Chapter 3). The issue of free trade is both complex and important enough that each side deserves a closer look, so we can see both sides together and get a feeling for what is really happening. After all, just because free trade may not have a substantial effect on employment alone, that is not necessarily true for the economy as a whole.
‘Trade policy’ is a broad term used to explain how international business is regulated globally. Each nation has its own set of laws pertaining to its trade policy. These laws can vary heavily from country to country. In some countries, governments are actively trying to promote an open economy, seeking to remove any barriers to entry in international markets for their home grown businesses while also allowing overseas businesses into their own markets to encourage competition. However in other countries, governments put legislation in place which is highly restrictive on overseas businesses in order to preserve their home grown businesses. In this essay I will define ‘trade policy’ in high detail, discuss the different roles in which governments
...ompanies cannot compete, Tonelson gives two credible reasons for trade barriers. First, infant industries will have a chance to develop and one day be able to compete on a global arena. Second, hurting industries will have a chance to revamp their productions, regain efficiency and once again compete with the foreign product. On the other hand, Krugman believes that most nations use trade deficit and international competitiveness as a political ploy to impose trade barriers. Each country’s economy depends on the population within the country, not on what other countries are doing. Nations should thus not impose any trade barriers so that the foreign competition could both stimulate and replace inefficient companies. Meanwhile, nations should upgrade their workforce to efficiently produce goods that ship to other countries, creating a mutually beneficial cycle.