Prosecutorial Discretion and Law Execution

1305 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discretionary powers in the United States criminal justice system

Prosecutorial Discretion
Whitebread and Slogobin state that the job of executing the law at the federal and state levels rests with the prosecution. This means that the prosecutor makes the decisions about the charges. Prosecutorial discretion means that the prosecutor decides whether someone should be charged for a crime and what that individual should be charged with (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000). The Bordenkircher v. Hayes (1978) case established some guidelines for using prosecutorial discretion. This case basically states as long as the prosecutor has probable cause to charge someone and what to file against them is at his discretion. Amongst the responsibilities of the prosecutor is the ability to decide how to bring the charges, such as, joinder of charges or joinder of parties. I will be discussing the choices that prosecutors must make when prosecuting a crime (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).
Sometimes the prosecutor will make the decision to forego prosecution. This could be done through a plea bargain or through dismissal of the charges. Plea bargains are agreements between the defendant and the prosecution, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence. There are some that feel that plea bargains don’t serve the interest of the Criminal Justice System because it is overburdening it (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).
A dismissal usually occurs when the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction; 75% of all cases result in dismissal by the prosecution. Many times there is enough evidence to place an individual on trial, but it would be a waste of time and resources to try a case you can’t win. Dismissing charges has its limitations and restrictions, so tha...

... middle of paper ...

...nce is sought because there is rarely a benefit for the defendant in this situation. However, joinder of defendants can be highly prejudicial due to reasons such as: a confession by one defendant can show guilt for both defendants, a testimony by a defendant that clears the codefendant may not be introduced into evidence, both defendants are convicted out of confusion of charges or evidence, or one defendant is convicted because of association with the codefendant (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).

Works Cited
Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 US 357 (1978)
Town of Newton v. Rumery, 480 US 386 (1987)
Oyler v. Boles, 368 US 448 (1962)
Wayte v. United States, 470 US 598
Falls v. Town of Dyer, Indiana, 875 F.2d 146 (7th Cir.1989)
United States v. Robinson, 311 F.Supp. 1063 (W.D.Mo.1969)
Whitebread, C. H. & Slobogin, C. (2000). Criminal procedure. New York: Foundation Press.

Show More
Related

  • R V. Rogerson And Mcnamara Case Analysis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    The conviction of guilty offenders when adhering to the guidelines of the NSW criminal trial process is not difficult based on the presumption of innocence. However, due to features of the criminal trial process, established by the adversarial system of trial, cases can often involve copious amounts of time and money, particularly evident in the case of R vs Rogerson and McNamara where factors such as time and money are demonstrated to be in excess. In addition, characteristics of the adversarial system such as plea bargaining has the power to hinder convictions due to the accused having the authority to hire experienced and expensive lawyers to argue their case, hence maintaining their innocence.

    Read More

  • The Casey Anthony Trial: The Trial Of O. J. Simpson

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jurors will thoroughly inspect and weigh over the evidence provided, and process any and all possible scenarios through the elements of crime. If the evidence does not support the prosecutor 's argument and the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must pronounce the defendant not guilty. If questionable or irrelevant evidence is included in the criminal proceeding, it is the duty of the prosecutor or defendant 's counsel to object and insist that the evidence be excluded by the presiding

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...instead of 25 years if they pleaded guilty. (Wan 37) In addition, money can become a reason for defense attorney to encourage pleading guilty. Private defense attorney may want to spend more effort in cases where they have more possibility of winning and thus getting more money, and public defenders find pleading guilty an effective way to move through cases quicker. (Mohr 6) For prosecutors, “guilty pleas avoided ‘onerous and protracted’ trials whose outcomes – ‘losing’ or ‘having to oppose an appeal to the higher courts’ – were both undesirable.” (Smith 134) Finally for judges, plea bargain reduces their caseload, and elevates their reputation indirectly because accepting a plea bargaining also includes waiver of appeal to higher courts. (Mohr 6)

    Read More

  • Dual Court System Q&A

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    pleas may be choose for the punishment likely to be associated with them rather than for their accuracy in describing the criminal offense in which the defendant was involved. For instance, a charge of indecent liberties, for example, in which the defendant is accused of sexual

    Read More

  • Final Project for Criminal Evidence and Procedures

    2001 Words  | 5 Pages

    Judges have fairly broad discretion. If evidence is ruled inadmissible, the court may, either on its own motion or on the defense's motion, determine that the remaining evidence the prosecution will present at trial is not sufficient. In short, the prosecution cannot prove an offense was committed, that the accused committed the offense and, therefore, cannot legally support a conviction. By the same token, on motion of the defense, the court can still determine that even if the evidence in question is admissible that it still does not reach the level of proving the elements of the crime charged, that the accused did commit the offense, and cannot legally support a conviction. So long as that determination is made before a jury is empanelled, or commencement of presentation of evidence in a bench trial the court may dismiss without prejudice. In that instance the prosecution can come back later with additional evidence and present charges again. However, the prosecution is still subject to the applicable statute of limitations.

    Read More

  • Pros Of Plea Bargaining

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    The court system is set up to deter the person specifically from a crime but also as a general deterrent to prevent the public from committing the same crime. With certain crimes, such as impaired driving, an accused may be given a stiffer penalty if found guilty than if taking a plea as the courts will want to prevent others from committing the same act and will give a harsh penalty as a warning to the public that the courts take this offence seriously. If an accused is a repeat offender, their sentence will become increasingly strict as their record lengthens. The courts will want to impose a specific deterrent and will give a harsher punishment as a means to cause the accused think twice about committing the act again. Therefore, pleading down to a lesser charge will help the accused to avoid the harsher

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Plea Bargaining

    2400 Words  | 5 Pages

    For a judge a primary encouragement for even accepting a plea bargain is so that the trials can be moved along a lot quicker. Plea bargains are much quicker by the requirement of the less work in trails being made (Maynard 17). Most judges do not really have the time to have every case on trial, it is very time consuming. If every case in the justice system did manage to go to trial, courts would definitely be overloaded that they would eventually get shut down (Larson). Judges often reason using plea bargains to “process out” offenders that are more likely not going to do that much jail time (Nolo qtd. in Larson). So that gives the judge and prosecutor the ability to want to push the defendant to take the plea bargain. Otherwise, the defendant goes to trail to plead without a plea bargain to mostly receive a guilty plea.

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Plea Bargaining Pros And Cons

    1083 Words  | 3 Pages

    The vast majority of criminal cases in the United States, the accused pleads guilty and no trial takes place (Siegel,

    Read More

  • Juvenile Intake Process

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    The attorney’s office of the prosecutor is usually the one’s who decide whether charges should

    Read More

  • Should Plea Bargaining be Abolished?

    2271 Words  | 5 Pages

    A plea bargain can be defined as, “a negotiation between the defendant and his attorney on one side and the prosecutor on the other, in which the defendant agrees to plead “guilty” or “no contest” to some crimes, in return for reduction of the severity of the charges, dismissal of some of the charges, the prosecutor’s willingness to recommend a particular sentence or some other benefit to the defendant. Sometimes one element of the bargain is that the defendant reveal information such as location of stolen goods, names of others participating in the crime or admission of other crimes. The judge must agree to the result of the plea bargain before accepting the plea. If he does not, then the bargain is cancelled.”

    Read More

  • review

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    “may prosecute with earnestness and vigor-indeed, he should do so. But while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one” (as cited in Neubauer & Fradella, 2014, p. 150).

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plea deals help everyone but I must also point out, that these plea deals also have its pitfalls. There are sometimes too light of sentences that are handed out, just to have a quick resolution, and come to find out, that the defendant has later committed an eve...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Plea Bargains

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    For decades, we have been made to believe that criminals are people who have done harm to our society, violating the laws of the land, and don 't deserve a second chance. They should be locked away, and the keys should throw away. Unfortunately, today, our world is full of crimes and our system is getting overcrowded with criminals. However, with recent laws like the plea bargain proofs that there is hope and a way out to every situation. A plea bargain can be defined as negotiations during a criminal trial between the prosecutor and the defendant which result in a more lenient sentence than would have been recommended with the original charge (Farlex). Some would say that the use, or abuse, of the plea bargain, allows criminals

    Read More

  • Contradictions In The Job Of The Prosecutor Case Study

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    One contradiction in the job of the prosecutor is that they have nearly limitless direction in critical matters; however, prosecutors’ are also held to a very high ethical standard. Prosecutors must screen cases to determine which ones need to be prosecuted; nevertheless, this is the source of controversy with most people. “What makes charging decisions more intriguing and controversial is the fact that in making this decision, the prosecutor has nearly limitless discretion” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). This means the prosecutor’s charging decisions are beyond any judicial review, so it must be apparent that a prosecutor

    Read More

  • Police Discretion: A Necessity for Criminal Justice Efficiency

    1675 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the media sensationalize cases about police officers abusing their powers, the public’s immediate response is to demand restrictions on them. While the abuse of discretion exists, allowing police officers to exercise discretion without controls is vital due to the unpredictable and multifaceted nature of crime. Thus, abolishing police discretion would be detrimental because police officers will primarily become law enforcers who ignore individual circumstances, cannot make meaningful differences in others’ lives, and cause inefficiencies in the criminal justice system.

    Read More

More about Prosecutorial Discretion and Law Execution

Open Document