Pros And Cons Of Triage

639 Words2 Pages

I would argue that at the very least, there needs to be some form of triage implemented. The way the Endangered Species Act is currently allocating funds is mediocre at best and has many flaws. There is no denying there are limited resources so that makes efficient use of them even more important. Each of the systems of triage outlined in this paper have valid points and problematic components. Elements of each system could be combined into a nicely working plan that recovers the greatest number of species on a limited budget.
Performing triage using the weighted ranked value system with elements of the other forms of triage outlined in this paper would be the best conservation method since it would factor in the many different complexities of conservation. Having low costs and a high chance of recovery being weighted more would increase the number of species saved in a similar way to Wilson et al.’s triage by time and cost. Having a rank system would also allow keystone species and others that are more important for biodiversity to be ranked higher as well. If the goal of conservation and triage is to preserve biodiversity, then those species should be at the top of the list since …show more content…

There is a danger that this would again create a bias towards charismatic species because they may appear to have higher social benefit. If anything, charismatic species should be the ones who receive little federal funding because it is easier for foundations to raise money for them since they are publicly appealing. Saving an animal based on their supposed economic, social, and cultural benefits goes against the basic ideas of conservation. Plants and animals have inherent values that are not based on how humans feel about or benefit from them. It makes sense to rank them based on how important they are to the survival of other species but not based on how beautiful or beneficial they are to

Open Document