Pros And Cons Of Traditional Indemnity Plans

1176 Words3 Pages

A(1). Fee-For-Service or Traditional Indemnity plans are uncommon but still used. Payment is rendered for services provided. Traditional Indemnity plans in general have no provider network and a patient can see a specialist without a referral. If a patient uses an FFS plan, the patient would pay the provider for medical care provided. If the medical care provided is covered by the plan. The insurance company would then reimburse the patient according to the guidelines stated in the policy or the UCR’s “Usual, Customary, and Reasonable Fees.” (“Private-Fee-For-Service Plans,” CMS.gov, 3/16/2012). Key benefits of a Traditional Indemnity or Fee-for-Service plan include no in network physicians or health care providers and the patient may see any physician or seek health care services at any healthcare facility. The patient or client can also seek treatment from a specialist without a physician referral. Fee-for-Service plans are the most flexible plans for choosing a healthcare provider and health care facility. However, Traditional …show more content…

The federal government has established general guidelines for providing and administering State Children’s Health Insurance. Immunizations and well/baby and well/child care is provided at no cost in every state. Eligibility requirements to receive State Children’s Health Insurance benefits, scopes, and services are determined by each individual state following federal government guidelines. Federal guidelines followed by every state that an individual must meet to receive benefits include: 19 years or younger in age, not covered by health insurance, including Medicaid and must be a US Citizen, legal alien, or permanent resident (“Benefits Details,” Benefits.gov,

More about Pros And Cons Of Traditional Indemnity Plans

Open Document